diff mbox series

scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment

Message ID 1891546521.01623299401994.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp3 (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series scsi: ufs: Add indent for code alignment | expand

Commit Message

Keoseong Park June 10, 2021, 4:07 a.m. UTC
Add indentation to return statement.

Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Joe Perches June 10, 2021, 4:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> Add indentation to return statement.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
[]
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	else
>  		return false;
>  #else
> -return true;
> +	return true;
>  #endif
>  }
>  

Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
 /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/
-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
-	if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
-	    !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
 		return true;
-	else
-		return false;
-#else
-return true;
-#endif
+
+	return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
+		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
 }
 
 static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
Keoseong Park June 17, 2021, 1:28 a.m. UTC | #2
>On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
>> Add indentation to return statement.
>[]
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>[]
>> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>  	else
>>  		return false;
>>  #else
>> -return true;
>> +	return true;
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  
>
>Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
>---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/
>-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
>-	if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>-	    !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
>+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
> 		return true;
>-	else
>-		return false;
>-#else
>-return true;
>-#endif
>+
>+	return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>+		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
> }
> 
> static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>

Hello Joe,
Thanks for your advice.
As you mentioned, refactoring looks good.
However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a patch with a new title?

Best Regards,
Keoseong
Joe Perches June 17, 2021, 3:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 10:28 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> > > Add indentation to return statement.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > []
> > > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool
> > > ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > >  	else
> > >  		return false;
> > >  #else
> > > -return true;
> > > +	return true;
> > >  #endif
> > >  }
> > >  
> > 
> > Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > @@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool
> > ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > {
> > /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not
> > detectable*/
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
> > -	if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
> > -	    !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
> > 		return true;
> > -	else
> > -		return false;
> > -#else
> > -return true;
> > -#endif
> > +
> > +	return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
> > +		!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
> > }
> > 
> > static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > 
> 
> Hello Joe,
> Thanks for your advice.
> As you mentioned, refactoring looks good.
> However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a
> patch with a new title?

Yes of course.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 8b1d0dad0764..97dfc6e94390 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@  static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	else
 		return false;
 #else
-return true;
+	return true;
 #endif
 }