From patchwork Fri Sep 22 06:17:33 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Smart X-Patchwork-Id: 9965231 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A10602D8 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB57829707 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BFDC32970B; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:18:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAE129707 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751852AbdIVGSO (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:18:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:36342 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751637AbdIVGSH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:18:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id f84so88317pfj.3 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:18:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=q7qj8cuNEFNLEGO3remJxzjpmohAl3RW9t6B0U+j8s4=; b=og1cE51ORlmKyD/lSRzrvruTE40w7BEFniWkWnhvtNXImP1C/Lq//+IN5Rw/mdBXPM 8z4XfqCSPH2n/SUWJHPvT3LdpGaDbu0bu/zwGNo1wAHz3h5wtZOe1ssQNSMH5R5j+blP o8/qhslJQyF+xIMxR6+/a/3NKP+mfjCz9MfNN5FOEufDhZeMLogcYs47EOKz12WhkCss pu2fW0eCVJIZj+f3ZryqS8LsLIgIU3UH1TlaWu8hSsj+FX9/4tsZuPatdqZ25xJv16dk 4RS5JrjMJpHsSkEsgY8MwQU45j4so6Y82POVz4ZG6k27A+hdisEKH/Tqhm7WfX78a1aj 91lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=q7qj8cuNEFNLEGO3remJxzjpmohAl3RW9t6B0U+j8s4=; b=PJ1Wk88W7PLsvpkrW16PZgChG5suDpWw3ca4fMfUNy3banvhibnOt9msyWE9OwkPFD xp8Mu56p3JKU76w/FLP6SlNf+M9c/7K8RtnpQOfuhGQFIJrAcfq2VNVkPwslbRKUx1nk ks/bGqZoIQauDPYKsPkgx/IGmpMfDJZpefdaAX/DKrBLYANIw9qDt8RiR0vvcGp4M1qU +nyPyTrNyfy1B60ZiQQ7j3weUSamLeJaH1ol8iuZNOZukZkNOSrB9KVE2Gvqaw8MnifJ PB+VZpNhxWpy2NEZfhkYUy3bDIwh1fjdhkpiZrsOdbvgKYakT81o4n1L4L90mLvT8sAD AkUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjxGc4EUk0Yo/uoWGdlGFA1lwBraZUsErxl+8n+tyX30t3WWhmQ WCf5XWPRZNKiAOeYQcFHWKg/zw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBPwYqTe37ikIqsBpvB/3sfuELuLQlrvyh081+Ds7KS2rXVxS3qwxOTqbRgybug7UljeOIZ8A== X-Received: by 10.98.134.194 with SMTP id x185mr8197470pfd.8.1506061086447; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from os42.localdomain (ip68-4-115-207.oc.oc.cox.net. [68.4.115.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e87sm5911355pfl.46.2017.09.21.23.18.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:18:05 -0700 (PDT) From: James Smart To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dick Kennedy , James Smart Subject: [PATCH 11/19] lpfc: Revise NVME module parameter descriptions for better clarity Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 23:17:33 -0700 Message-Id: <20170922061741.12347-12-jsmart2021@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.1 In-Reply-To: <20170922061741.12347-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> References: <20170922061741.12347-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Dick Kennedy The descriptions for lpfc_xri_split and lpfc_enable_fc4_type were poor. Revise for better understanding: lpfc_xri_split - Percentage of FCP XRI resources versus NVME lpfc_enable_fc4_type - Enable FC4 Protocol support - FCP / NVME Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy Signed-off-by: James Smart Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c index dc6519b2c53a..4dcd129ca901 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c @@ -3377,7 +3377,7 @@ LPFC_ATTR_R(nvmet_mrq, */ LPFC_ATTR_R(enable_fc4_type, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, LPFC_ENABLE_BOTH, - "Define fc4 type to register with fabric."); + "Enable FC4 Protocol support - FCP / NVME"); /* * lpfc_xri_split: Defines the division of XRI resources between SCSI and NVME @@ -3393,7 +3393,7 @@ LPFC_ATTR_R(enable_fc4_type, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, * percentage will go to NVME. */ LPFC_ATTR_R(xri_split, 50, 10, 90, - "Division of XRI resources between SCSI and NVME"); + "Percentage of FCP XRI resources versus NVME"); /* # lpfc_log_verbose: Only turn this flag on if you are willing to risk being