Message ID | 20180215155839.GA8967@jordon-HP-15-Notebook-PC (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Deferred |
Headers | show |
Any comment for this patch. On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > Use dma_pool_zalloc() instead of dma_pool_alloc + memset > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > index cff43bd..d00d37d 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > @@ -790,12 +790,11 @@ static int mvs_task_prep(struct sas_task *task, struct mvs_info *mvi, int is_tmf > slot->n_elem = n_elem; > slot->slot_tag = tag; > > - slot->buf = dma_pool_alloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); > + slot->buf = dma_pool_zalloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); > if (!slot->buf) { > rc = -ENOMEM; > goto err_out_tag; > } > - memset(slot->buf, 0, MVS_SLOT_BUF_SZ); > > tei.task = task; > tei.hdr = &mvi->slot[tag]; > -- > 1.9.1 >
Hi Martin, Any comment for this patch ? On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > Any comment for this patch. > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote: >> Use dma_pool_zalloc() instead of dma_pool_alloc + memset >> >> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c >> index cff43bd..d00d37d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c >> @@ -790,12 +790,11 @@ static int mvs_task_prep(struct sas_task *task, struct mvs_info *mvi, int is_tmf >> slot->n_elem = n_elem; >> slot->slot_tag = tag; >> >> - slot->buf = dma_pool_alloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); >> + slot->buf = dma_pool_zalloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); >> if (!slot->buf) { >> rc = -ENOMEM; >> goto err_out_tag; >> } >> - memset(slot->buf, 0, MVS_SLOT_BUF_SZ); >> >> tei.task = task; >> tei.hdr = &mvi->slot[tag]; >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> -Souptick
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c index cff43bd..d00d37d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c @@ -790,12 +790,11 @@ static int mvs_task_prep(struct sas_task *task, struct mvs_info *mvi, int is_tmf slot->n_elem = n_elem; slot->slot_tag = tag; - slot->buf = dma_pool_alloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); + slot->buf = dma_pool_zalloc(mvi->dma_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &slot->buf_dma); if (!slot->buf) { rc = -ENOMEM; goto err_out_tag; } - memset(slot->buf, 0, MVS_SLOT_BUF_SZ); tei.task = task; tei.hdr = &mvi->slot[tag];
Use dma_pool_zalloc() instead of dma_pool_alloc + memset Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> --- drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1