From patchwork Tue Jul 2 13:23:24 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yue Haibing X-Patchwork-Id: 11027859 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C988513A4 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1C62890B for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A3AF028911; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568F2288F7 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726824AbfGBN0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jul 2019 09:26:44 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:7689 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725922AbfGBN0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jul 2019 09:26:44 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 46EE2FECA8D12E48B4F3; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 21:26:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.133.213.239) by DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 21:26:30 +0800 From: YueHaibing To: , , , CC: , , YueHaibing Subject: [PATCH -next] scsi: bfa: Make two functions static Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 21:23:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20190702132324.48136-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.133.213.239] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Fix sparse warnings: drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c:6982:1: warning: symbol 'bfa_flash_sem_get' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c:6995:1: warning: symbol 'bfa_flash_sem_put' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: YueHaibing --- drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c index 93471d7..aae1db1 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c @@ -6970,7 +6970,7 @@ bfa_raw_sem_get(void __iomem *bar) } -bfa_status_t +static bfa_status_t bfa_flash_sem_get(void __iomem *bar) { u32 n = FLASH_BLOCKING_OP_MAX; @@ -6983,7 +6983,7 @@ bfa_flash_sem_get(void __iomem *bar) return BFA_STATUS_OK; } -void +static void bfa_flash_sem_put(void __iomem *bar) { writel(0, (bar + FLASH_SEM_LOCK_REG));