diff mbox series

[1/3] scsi: Cleanup scsi_noretry_cmd()

Message ID 20200910073952.212130-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Improve error handling | expand

Commit Message

Damien Le Moal Sept. 10, 2020, 7:39 a.m. UTC
No need for else after return.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Bart Van Assche Sept. 10, 2020, 5:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2020-09-10 00:39, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> No need for else after return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 927b1e641842..5f3726abed78 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -1755,8 +1755,8 @@ int scsi_noretry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>  	if (scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV ||
>  	    blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request))
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }

Is this patch useful? Is it necessary? Or is it just code churn?

Thanks,

Bart.
Damien Le Moal Sept. 10, 2020, 10:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2020/09/11 2:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-09-10 00:39, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> No need for else after return.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> index 927b1e641842..5f3726abed78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> @@ -1755,8 +1755,8 @@ int scsi_noretry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>>  	if (scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV ||
>>  	    blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request))
>>  		return 1;
>> -	else
>> -		return 0;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> Is this patch useful? Is it necessary? Or is it just code churn?

Sure, you may consider it code churn, but I prefer the more positive view that
it improves code style. And looking at it again, I think the proper change
should actually be:

	return scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV ||
		blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request);

A lot cleaner.

But no strong feelings. If you really do not like the change, I will drop it.

Best regards.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index 927b1e641842..5f3726abed78 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -1755,8 +1755,8 @@  int scsi_noretry_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
 	if (scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV ||
 	    blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request))
 		return 1;
-	else
-		return 0;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**