| Message ID | 20210609033929.3815-7-martin.petersen@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Deferred |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Subject: Protection information and block size cleanup | expand |
Hey Martin, please set me and Steffen on CC next time for zfcp. On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 11:39:20PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Use scsi_prot_ref_tag() and scsi_prot_interval() instead > scsi_get_lba() and sector_size. > > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c > index 2e4804ef2fb9..1990216cf289 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c > @@ -2599,8 +2599,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_fcp_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_cmnd) > io->fcp_cmnd_length = FCP_CMND_LEN; > > if (scsi_get_prot_op(scsi_cmnd) != SCSI_PROT_NORMAL) { > - io->data_block_length = scsi_cmnd->device->sector_size; > - io->ref_tag_value = scsi_get_lba(scsi_cmnd) & 0xFFFFFFFF; > + io->data_block_length = scsi_prot_interval(scsi_cmnd); > + io->ref_tag_value = scsi_prot_ref_tag(scsi_cmnd); Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com> Out of curiosity, do you have any idea whether there is any storage that offers DIF with a different Logical Block Size than 512 (I haven't see any, although, that doesn't say much)? Just re-read some parts of our HBA specs and we probably would be in trouble, if it does, with how we do things here.
Benjamin, > please set me and Steffen on CC next time for zfcp. Sure. > Out of curiosity, do you have any idea whether there is any storage > that offers DIF with a different Logical Block Size than 512 (I > haven't see any, although, that doesn't say much)? Just re-read some > parts of our HBA specs and we probably would be in trouble, if it > does, with how we do things here. I have a few that are 4Kn+8. It wouldn't say these are very common, the 16-bit CRC isn't that great with 4K blocks. To address the block size issue we defined a couple of new protection formats in NVMe. These allow for 32 and 64-bit CRCs, larger reference tags, etc. However, these enhancements have yet to percolate down into SCSI/SBC.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:27:57PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Out of curiosity, do you have any idea whether there is any storage > > that offers DIF with a different Logical Block Size than 512 (I > > haven't see any, although, that doesn't say much)? Just re-read some > > parts of our HBA specs and we probably would be in trouble, if it > > does, with how we do things here. > > I have a few that are 4Kn+8. It wouldn't say these are very common, the > 16-bit CRC isn't that great with 4K blocks. > > To address the block size issue we defined a couple of new protection > formats in NVMe. These allow for 32 and 64-bit CRCs, larger reference > tags, etc. However, these enhancements have yet to percolate down into > SCSI/SBC. Oh, interesting. Thanks for sharing.
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index 2e4804ef2fb9..1990216cf289 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -2599,8 +2599,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_fcp_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_cmnd) io->fcp_cmnd_length = FCP_CMND_LEN; if (scsi_get_prot_op(scsi_cmnd) != SCSI_PROT_NORMAL) { - io->data_block_length = scsi_cmnd->device->sector_size; - io->ref_tag_value = scsi_get_lba(scsi_cmnd) & 0xFFFFFFFF; + io->data_block_length = scsi_prot_interval(scsi_cmnd); + io->ref_tag_value = scsi_prot_ref_tag(scsi_cmnd); } if (zfcp_fsf_set_data_dir(scsi_cmnd, &io->data_direction))
Use scsi_prot_ref_tag() and scsi_prot_interval() instead scsi_get_lba() and sector_size. Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)