[v2] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_init: deleted these repeated words

Commit Message

[e-mail] June 10, 2021, 6:09 a.m. UTC

From: lijian <[e-mail]>

deleted these repeated words 'the', 'using' and 'be' in the comments.

Signed-off-by: lijian <[e-mail]>
---
v2: Fix these typos
Change 'irrelvant' to 'irrelevant'.
Change 'will be re-try' to 'will be retried'.

 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Joe Perches June 10, 2021, 6:20 a.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 14:09 +0800, [e-mail] wrote:
> From: lijian <[e-mail]>
> 
> deleted these repeated words 'the', 'using' and 'be' in the comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: lijian <[e-mail]>
> ---
> v2: Fix these typos
> Change 'irrelvant' to 'irrelevant'.
> Change 'will be re-try' to 'will be retried'.

This should be part of the commit message.
The content below the --- line is not added to any git commit.
 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
[]
> @@ -5894,7 +5894,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_async_fip_evt(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>  				phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_ACVL_DISC;
>  				spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
>  				/*
> -				 * Last resort will be re-try on
> +				 * Last resort will be retried on

retried on the current/to retry (with?) the current

Your spelling fixes seem reasonable but perhaps you could find a
fully fluent English speaker/writer to review your proposals before
submitting English grammar patches.

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 932c6bdb8c40..bba1ecdfa501 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -5094,7 +5094,7 @@  lpfc_sli4_async_link_evt(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
 	bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_link_spd, la,
 	       (bf_get(lpfc_acqe_link_speed, acqe_link)));
 
-	/* Fake the following irrelvant fields */
+	/* Fake the following irrelevant fields */
 	bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_topology, la, LPFC_TOPOLOGY_PT_PT);
 	bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_alpa_granted, la, 0);
 	bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_il, la, 0);
@@ -5894,7 +5894,7 @@  lpfc_sli4_async_fip_evt(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
 				phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_ACVL_DISC;
 				spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
 				/*
-				 * Last resort will be re-try on
+				 * Last resort will be retried on
 				 * the current registered FCF entry.
 				 */
 				lpfc_retry_pport_discovery(phba);