Message ID | 20230923002932.1082348-13-dlemoal@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix libata suspend/resume handling and code cleanup | expand |
On 9/22/23 17:29, Damien Le Moal wrote: > The scsi device flag no_start_on_resume is not set by any scsi low > level driver. Remove it. This reverts the changes introduced by commit > 0a8589055936 ("ata,scsi: do not issue START STOP UNIT on resume"). > > Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Tested-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 13 ++++--------- > include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > index bff8663be7e0..e372834bf56f 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > @@ -3900,20 +3900,15 @@ static int sd_resume(struct device *dev, bool runtime) > if (!sdkp) /* E.g.: runtime resume at the start of sd_probe() */ > return 0; > > - if (!sd_do_start_stop(sdkp->device, runtime)) { > - sdkp->suspended = 0; > - return 0; > - } > - > - if (!sdkp->device->no_start_on_resume) { > + if (sd_do_start_stop(sdkp->device, runtime)) { > sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Starting disk\n"); > ret = sd_start_stop_device(sdkp, 1); > + if (!ret) > + opal_unlock_from_suspend(sdkp->opal_dev); > } > > - if (!ret) { > - opal_unlock_from_suspend(sdkp->opal_dev); > + if (!ret) > sdkp->suspended = 0; > - } > > return ret; > } I'm fine with removing the no_start_on_resume member but it seems to me that the above patch makes sd_resume() harder to read. I like the original approach (early return if sd_do_start_stop() returns false) better than the new approach (set ret inside an if-statement and clear sdkp->suspended after the sd_start_stop_device() call if ret == 0). In case others prefer the new flow: shouldn't that new flow have been introduced in patch 4/23 of this series instead of in this patch? Thanks, Bart.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index bff8663be7e0..e372834bf56f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -3900,20 +3900,15 @@ static int sd_resume(struct device *dev, bool runtime) if (!sdkp) /* E.g.: runtime resume at the start of sd_probe() */ return 0; - if (!sd_do_start_stop(sdkp->device, runtime)) { - sdkp->suspended = 0; - return 0; - } - - if (!sdkp->device->no_start_on_resume) { + if (sd_do_start_stop(sdkp->device, runtime)) { sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Starting disk\n"); ret = sd_start_stop_device(sdkp, 1); + if (!ret) + opal_unlock_from_suspend(sdkp->opal_dev); } - if (!ret) { - opal_unlock_from_suspend(sdkp->opal_dev); + if (!ret) sdkp->suspended = 0; - } return ret; } diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h index b7df1e6da969..8db0c88cf48e 100644 --- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h @@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ struct scsi_device { unsigned allow_restart:1; /* issue START_UNIT in error handler */ unsigned manage_system_start_stop:1; /* Let HLD (sd) manage system start/stop */ unsigned manage_runtime_start_stop:1; /* Let HLD (sd) manage runtime start/stop */ - unsigned no_start_on_resume:1; /* Do not issue START_STOP_UNIT on resume */ unsigned start_stop_pwr_cond:1; /* Set power cond. in START_STOP_UNIT */ unsigned no_uld_attach:1; /* disable connecting to upper level drivers */ unsigned select_no_atn:1;