diff mbox series

scsi: ufs: core: Fix mcq mac configuration

Message ID 20240220095637.2900067-1-rohitner@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 767712f91de76abd22a45184e6e3440120b8bfce
Headers show
Series scsi: ufs: core: Fix mcq mac configuration | expand

Commit Message

Rohit Ner Feb. 20, 2024, 9:56 a.m. UTC
As per JEDEC Standard No. 223E Section 5.9.2,
the max # active commands value programmed by the host sw
in MCQConfig.MAC should be one less than the actual value.

Signed-off-by: Rohit Ner <rohitner@google.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Bart Van Assche Feb. 20, 2024, 8:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2/20/24 01:56, Rohit Ner wrote:
> As per JEDEC Standard No. 223E Section 5.9.2,
> the max # active commands value programmed by the host sw
> in MCQConfig.MAC should be one less than the actual value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Ner <rohitner@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> index 0787456c2b89..c873fd823942 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void ufshcd_mcq_config_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 max_active_cmds)
>   
>   	val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>   	val &= ~MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK;
> -	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds);
> +	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds - 1);
>   	ufshcd_writel(hba, val, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_config_mac);

I'd like to hear the feedback from the UFS controller vendors about this patch
since the UFSHCI specification of the MaxActiveCommand controller field is
ambiguous. While the example shows that 32 should be configured as 1Fh, this is
not documented in any other way.

Thanks,

Bart.
Peter Wang (王信友) Feb. 21, 2024, 8:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 01:56 -0800, Rohit Ner wrote:
> As per JEDEC Standard No. 223E Section 5.9.2,
> the max # active commands value programmed by the host sw
> in MCQConfig.MAC should be one less than the actual value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Ner <rohitner@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> index 0787456c2b89..c873fd823942 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void ufshcd_mcq_config_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32
> max_active_cmds)
>  
>  	val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>  	val &= ~MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK;
> -	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds);
> +	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds - 1);
>  	ufshcd_writel(hba, val, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_config_mac);


Meidatek host controller MAC_SUPP_MAC setting is 64, which 
should config to 0x3F.


Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
Can Guo Feb. 21, 2024, 9:07 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2/20/2024 5:56 PM, Rohit Ner wrote:
> As per JEDEC Standard No. 223E Section 5.9.2,
> the max # active commands value programmed by the host sw
> in MCQConfig.MAC should be one less than the actual value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Ner <rohitner@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> index 0787456c2b89..c873fd823942 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void ufshcd_mcq_config_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 max_active_cmds)
>   
>   	val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>   	val &= ~MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK;
> -	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds);
> +	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds - 1);
>   	ufshcd_writel(hba, val, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_config_mac);

Reviewed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Martin K. Petersen March 10, 2024, 9:12 p.m. UTC | #4
Rohit,

> As per JEDEC Standard No. 223E Section 5.9.2, the max # active
> commands value programmed by the host sw in MCQConfig.MAC should be
> one less than the actual value.

Applied to 6.9/scsi-staging, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
index 0787456c2b89..c873fd823942 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@  void ufshcd_mcq_config_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 max_active_cmds)
 
 	val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
 	val &= ~MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK;
-	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds);
+	val |= FIELD_PREP(MCQ_CFG_MAC_MASK, max_active_cmds - 1);
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, val, REG_UFS_MCQ_CFG);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_config_mac);