diff mbox series

[RFC,v3,1/4] ufs: core: prepare ufs for multi circular queue support

Message ID 757bbfe36629b7c31ef2630971f8678a7801223f.1662157846.git.quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series UFS Multi-Circular Queue (MCQ) | expand

Commit Message

Asutosh Das Sept. 2, 2022, 10:41 p.m. UTC
Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.

Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

Comments

Bean Huo Sept. 5, 2022, 12:26 p.m. UTC | #1
Asutosh,


On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 15:41 -0700, Asutosh Das wrote:
> Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> ----------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> 
>  
> @@ -2134,14 +2135,14 @@ static void ufshcd_update_monitor(struct
> ufs_hba *hba, const struct ufshcd_lrb *
>   * @task_tag: Task tag of the command
>   */

You didn't change parameter name in the function description.

>  static inline
> -void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
> +void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb
> *lrbp)
>  {
> -       struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
> +       int task_tag = lrbp->task_tag;
>         unsigned long flags;
>  
>         lrbp->issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
>         lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
> -       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, UFS_CMD_SEND);
> +       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_SEND);
>         ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
>         if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
>                 ufshcd_start_monitor(hba, lrbp);
> @@ -2553,9 +2554,10 @@ void ufshcd_prepare_utp_scsi_cmd_upiu(struct
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u8 upiu_flags)
>         /* command descriptor fields */
>         ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_0 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
>                                 UPIU_TRANSACTION_COMMAND, upiu_flags,
> -                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag);
> +                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag & 0xff);
>         ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_1 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
> -                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0, 0);
> +                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0,
> +                               (lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4);
>  

Are you sure here "(lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4" is correct? 


this will overwrite other fields, see UPIU_HEADER_DWORD:

#define UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(byte3, byte2, byte1, byte0)\
                        cpu_to_be32((byte3 << 24) | (byte2 << 16) |\
                         (byte1 << 8) | (byte0))



> 
>  
> -       ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
> +       ufshcd_send_command(hba, lrbp);
>         err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
>         ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR :
> UFS_QUERY_COMP,
>                                     (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp-
> >ucd_rsp_ptr);
> @@ -4513,6 +4515,7 @@ int ufshcd_make_hba_operational(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
>                         REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
>         ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utrdl_dma_addr),
>                         REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_H);
> +
>         ufshcd_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
>                         REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
>         ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
> @@ -5320,6 +5323,32 @@ static void ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(struct
> ufs_hba *hba,
>         ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
>  }
>  
> +void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag)

This function does only complete one task. What does cqe stand for?

> +{
> +       struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
> +       struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
> +
> +       lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
> +       lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
> +       cmd = lrbp->cmd;
> +       if (cmd) {
> +               if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba,
> lrbp)))
> +                       ufshcd_update_monitor(hba, lrbp);
> +               ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_COMP);
> +               cmd->result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp);
> +               ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
> +               /* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
> +               scsi_done(cmd);
> +       } else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
> +                  lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
> +               if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
> +                       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp,
> UFS_DEV_COMP);
> +                       complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
> +                       ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
> +               }
> +       }
> +}
> +


Kind regards,
Bean
Asutosh Das Sept. 8, 2022, 3 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello Bean
Thanks for your comments. Responses inline.

On 9/5/2022 5:26 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> Asutosh,
> 
> 
[...]
> 
>>   static inline
>> -void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
>> +void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb
>> *lrbp)
>>   {
>> -       struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
>> +       int task_tag = lrbp->task_tag;
>>          unsigned long flags;
>>   
>>          lrbp->issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
>>          lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
>> -       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, UFS_CMD_SEND);
>> +       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_SEND);
>>          ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
>>          if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
>>                  ufshcd_start_monitor(hba, lrbp);
>> @@ -2553,9 +2554,10 @@ void ufshcd_prepare_utp_scsi_cmd_upiu(struct
>> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u8 upiu_flags)
>>          /* command descriptor fields */
>>          ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_0 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
>>                                  UPIU_TRANSACTION_COMMAND, upiu_flags,
>> -                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag);
>> +                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag & 0xff);
>>          ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_1 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
>> -                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0, 0);
>> +                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0,
>> +                               (lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4);
>>   
> 
> Are you sure here "(lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4" is correct?
> 
EXT_IID is the higher nibble in DWORD1. So this looks correct to me.

COMMAND UPIU
0 	    1 	  2 	3
xx000001b Flags LUN Task Tag
4 			5 	6 	7
IID Command Set Type Reserved Reserved EXT_IID | Reserved
> 
> this will overwrite other fields, see UPIU_HEADER_DWORD:
> 
> #define UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(byte3, byte2, byte1, byte0)\
>                          cpu_to_be32((byte3 << 24) | (byte2 << 16) |\
>                           (byte1 << 8) | (byte0))
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>   
>> -       ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
>> +       ufshcd_send_command(hba, lrbp);
>>          err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
>>          ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR :
>> UFS_QUERY_COMP,
>>                                      (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp-
>>> ucd_rsp_ptr);
>> @@ -4513,6 +4515,7 @@ int ufshcd_make_hba_operational(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba)
>>                          REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
>>          ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utrdl_dma_addr),
>>                          REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_H);
>> +
>>          ufshcd_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
>>                          REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
>>          ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
>> @@ -5320,6 +5323,32 @@ static void ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(struct
>> ufs_hba *hba,
>>          ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
>>   }
>>   
>> +void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag)
> 
> This function does only complete one task. What does cqe stand for?
> 
CQE - Completion Queue Entry. The term 'task' is used for TM commands in 
scsi, hence there was a comment to change it to CQE.

>> +{
>> +       struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
>> +       struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
>> +
>> +       lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
>> +       lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
>> +       cmd = lrbp->cmd;
>> +       if (cmd) {
>> +               if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba,
>> lrbp)))
>> +                       ufshcd_update_monitor(hba, lrbp);
>> +               ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_COMP);
>> +               cmd->result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp);
>> +               ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
>> +               /* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
>> +               scsi_done(cmd);
>> +       } else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
>> +                  lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
>> +               if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
>> +                       ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp,
>> UFS_DEV_COMP);
>> +                       complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
>> +                       ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Bean
>
Bean Huo Sept. 8, 2022, 8:23 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 20:00 -0700, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> > > ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u8 upiu_flags)
> > >           /* command descriptor fields */
> > >           ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_0 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
> > >                                   UPIU_TRANSACTION_COMMAND,
> > > upiu_flags,
> > > -                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag);
> > > +                               lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag &
> > > 0xff);
> > >           ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_1 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
> > > -                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0,
> > > 0);
> > > +                               UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0,
> > > +                               (lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4);
> > >    
> > 
> > Are you sure here "(lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4" is correct?
> > 
> EXT_IID is the higher nibble in DWORD1. So this looks correct to me.
> 
> COMMAND UPIU
> 0           1     2     3
> xx000001b Flags LUN Task Tag
> 4                       5       6       7
> IID Command Set Type Reserved Reserved EXT_IID | Reserved

Hi Asutosh,

yes, [7:4] of byte 7 in UPIU header for host to device UPIUs EXT_IID,
this is correct.

but I think byte7 should be  (lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) >> 4); rather
than "<< 4"

or what I missundersood.


Kind regards,
Bean
Bart Van Assche Sept. 8, 2022, 9:58 p.m. UTC | #4
On 9/2/22 15:41, Asutosh Das wrote:
> Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.

One patch per change please and also describe each individual change. 
 From 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#split-changes: 
"Separate each logical change into a separate patch".

Thanks,

Bart.
Asutosh Das Sept. 9, 2022, 10:48 p.m. UTC | #5
Hello Bart,
Thanks for the comments.

On 9/8/2022 2:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/2/22 15:41, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.
> 
> One patch per change please and also describe each individual change. 
>  From 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#split-changes: "Separate each logical change into a separate patch".
> 
The intent of this change was to have all the non-mcq related changes to 
the ufshcd as a separate patch.
I would add more details to the commit message of this change.
If there's anything specific in this patch that may need changes, please 
let me know.

> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

-asd
Bart Van Assche Sept. 9, 2022, 11:38 p.m. UTC | #6
On 9/9/22 15:48, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> Hello Bart,
> Thanks for the comments.
> 
> On 9/8/2022 2:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 9/2/22 15:41, Asutosh Das wrote:
>>> Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.
>>
>> One patch per change please and also describe each individual change. 
>>  From 
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#split-changes: 
>> "Separate each logical change into a separate patch".
>>
> The intent of this change was to have all the non-mcq related changes to 
> the ufshcd as a separate patch.
> I would add more details to the commit message of this change.
> If there's anything specific in this patch that may need changes, please 
> let me know.

Please follow the "one change per patch" rule. This is a widely followed 
rule in the Linux kernel community. This rule exists because it is the 
responsibility of the developer(s) who post a patch series to make it 
easy for reviewers to review their work.

Thanks,

Bart.
Asutosh Das Sept. 12, 2022, 6:18 p.m. UTC | #7
On 9/9/2022 4:38 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/9/22 15:48, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
>> Hello Bart,
>> Thanks for the comments.
>>
>> On 9/8/2022 2:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 9/2/22 15:41, Asutosh Das wrote:
>>>> Preparatory changes for upcoming multi circular queue.
>>>
>>> One patch per change please and also describe each individual change. 
>>>  From 
>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#split-changes: "Separate each logical change into a separate patch".
>>>
>> The intent of this change was to have all the non-mcq related changes 
>> to the ufshcd as a separate patch.
>> I would add more details to the commit message of this change.
>> If there's anything specific in this patch that may need changes, 
>> please let me know.
> 
> Please follow the "one change per patch" rule. This is a widely followed 
> rule in the Linux kernel community. This rule exists because it is the 
> responsibility of the developer(s) who post a patch series to make it 
> easy for reviewers to review their work.
> 
Let me review and restructure the code and push it again.
I would like to remove the RFC tag in the next version.
Please let me know if that's _not_ OK.

> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index f4f8ded..b119f45 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@  static int ufshcd_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static int ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd);
 static int ufshcd_clear_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag);
 static void ufshcd_hba_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
-static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool init_dev_params);
+static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool initial_boot);
 static int ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on);
 static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static int ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba);
@@ -310,10 +310,11 @@  static void ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 		scsi_block_requests(hba->host);
 }
 
-static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
+static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+				      struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
 				      enum ufs_trace_str_t str_t)
 {
-	struct utp_upiu_req *rq = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
+	struct utp_upiu_req *rq = lrbp->ucd_req_ptr;
 	struct utp_upiu_header *header;
 
 	if (!trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled())
@@ -322,7 +323,7 @@  static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
 	if (str_t == UFS_CMD_SEND)
 		header = &rq->header;
 	else
-		header = &hba->lrb[tag].ucd_rsp_ptr->header;
+		header = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header;
 
 	trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t, header, &rq->sc.cdb,
 			  UFS_TSF_CDB);
@@ -379,13 +380,13 @@  static void ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 				 ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UIC_COMMAND_ARG_3));
 }
 
-static void ufshcd_add_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
+static void ufshcd_add_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+				     struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
 				     enum ufs_trace_str_t str_t)
 {
 	u64 lba = 0;
 	u8 opcode = 0, group_id = 0;
 	u32 intr, doorbell;
-	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
 	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = lrbp->cmd;
 	struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd);
 	int transfer_len = -1;
@@ -394,7 +395,7 @@  static void ufshcd_add_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
 		return;
 
 	/* trace UPIU also */
-	ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(hba, tag, str_t);
+	ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(hba, lrbp, str_t);
 	if (!trace_ufshcd_command_enabled())
 		return;
 
@@ -419,7 +420,7 @@  static void ufshcd_add_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
 
 	intr = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
 	doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
-	trace_ufshcd_command(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t, tag,
+	trace_ufshcd_command(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t, lrbp->task_tag,
 			doorbell, transfer_len, intr, lba, opcode, group_id);
 }
 
@@ -2134,14 +2135,14 @@  static void ufshcd_update_monitor(struct ufs_hba *hba, const struct ufshcd_lrb *
  * @task_tag: Task tag of the command
  */
 static inline
-void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
+void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 {
-	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
+	int task_tag = lrbp->task_tag;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	lrbp->issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
 	lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
-	ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, UFS_CMD_SEND);
+	ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_SEND);
 	ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
 	if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
 		ufshcd_start_monitor(hba, lrbp);
@@ -2553,9 +2554,10 @@  void ufshcd_prepare_utp_scsi_cmd_upiu(struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u8 upiu_flags)
 	/* command descriptor fields */
 	ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_0 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
 				UPIU_TRANSACTION_COMMAND, upiu_flags,
-				lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag);
+				lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag & 0xff);
 	ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_1 = UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(
-				UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0, 0);
+				UPIU_COMMAND_SET_TYPE_SCSI, 0, 0,
+				(lrbp->task_tag & 0xf00) << 4);
 
 	/* Total EHS length and Data segment length will be zero */
 	ucd_req_ptr->header.dword_2 = 0;
@@ -2845,7 +2847,7 @@  static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
+	ufshcd_send_command(hba, lrbp);
 
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -2971,7 +2973,7 @@  static int ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	if (!time_left) {
 		err = -ETIMEDOUT;
-		dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: dev_cmd request timedout, tag %d\n",
+		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: dev_cmd request timedout, tag %d\n",
 			__func__, lrbp->task_tag);
 		if (!ufshcd_clear_cmds(hba, 1U << lrbp->task_tag))
 			/* successfully cleared the command, retry if needed */
@@ -3021,7 +3023,7 @@  static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND, lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
 
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
+	ufshcd_send_command(hba, lrbp);
 	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
 	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR : UFS_QUERY_COMP,
 				    (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr);
@@ -4513,6 +4515,7 @@  int ufshcd_make_hba_operational(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 			REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utrdl_dma_addr),
 			REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_H);
+
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
 			REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
@@ -5320,6 +5323,32 @@  static void ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 	ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
 }
 
+void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag)
+{
+	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
+	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
+
+	lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
+	lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
+	cmd = lrbp->cmd;
+	if (cmd) {
+		if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
+			ufshcd_update_monitor(hba, lrbp);
+		ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_CMD_COMP);
+		cmd->result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp);
+		ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
+		/* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
+		scsi_done(cmd);
+	} else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
+		   lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
+		if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
+			ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, lrbp, UFS_DEV_COMP);
+			complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
+			ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl - handle SCSI and query command completion
  * @hba: per adapter instance
@@ -5328,32 +5357,10 @@  static void ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 					unsigned long completed_reqs)
 {
-	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
-	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
-	int index;
-
-	for_each_set_bit(index, &completed_reqs, hba->nutrs) {
-		lrbp = &hba->lrb[index];
-		lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
-		cmd = lrbp->cmd;
-		if (cmd) {
-			if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
-				ufshcd_update_monitor(hba, lrbp);
-			ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, index, UFS_CMD_COMP);
-			cmd->result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp);
-			ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, lrbp);
-			/* Do not touch lrbp after scsi done */
-			scsi_done(cmd);
-		} else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
-			lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
-			if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
-				ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, index,
-							 UFS_DEV_COMP);
-				complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
-				ufshcd_clk_scaling_update_busy(hba);
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	int tag;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(tag, &completed_reqs, hba->nutrs)
+		ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(hba, tag);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -6869,7 +6876,7 @@  static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND, lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
 
-	ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
+	ufshcd_send_command(hba, lrbp);
 	/*
 	 * ignore the returning value here - ufshcd_check_query_response is
 	 * bound to fail since dev_cmd.query and dev_cmd.type were left empty.
@@ -8138,11 +8145,11 @@  static int ufshcd_add_lus(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 /**
  * ufshcd_probe_hba - probe hba to detect device and initialize it
  * @hba: per-adapter instance
- * @init_dev_params: whether or not to call ufshcd_device_params_init().
+ * @initial_boot: Whether or not from initial bootup
  *
  * Execute link-startup and verify device initialization
  */
-static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool init_dev_params)
+static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool initial_boot)
 {
 	int ret;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -8177,7 +8184,7 @@  static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool init_dev_params)
 	 * Initialize UFS device parameters used by driver, these
 	 * parameters are associated with UFS descriptors.
 	 */
-	if (init_dev_params) {
+	if (initial_boot) {
 		ret = ufshcd_device_params_init(hba);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;