diff mbox

[3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file

Message ID 1467994782-26474-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Vivek Goyal July 8, 2016, 4:19 p.m. UTC 
Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
wrong.

If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
will be aborted.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c    |  7 +++++++
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/security.h  |  6 ++++++
 security/security.c       |  8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

Comments

kernel test robot July 8, 2016, 5:41 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi,

[auto build test ERROR on next-20160708]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc6]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-selinux/next security/next v4.7-rc6 v4.7-rc5 v4.7-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vivek-Goyal/Overlayfs-SELinux-Support/20160709-002635
config: mips-gpr_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=mips 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c:27:0:
   include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_inode_copy_up_xattr':
>> include/linux/security.h:770:2: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
     -EOPNOTSUPP;
     ^
   include/linux/security.h:771:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
    }
    ^
   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

vim +770 include/linux/security.h

   764	{
   765		return 0;
   766	}
   767	
   768	static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
   769	{
 > 770		-EOPNOTSUPP;
   771	}
   772	
   773	static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
Stephen Smalley July 11, 2016, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 07/08/2016 12:19 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
> copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
> to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
> claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
> wrong.

0 if the security module wants the xattr to be copied up, 1 if the
security module wants the xattr to be discarded on the copy, -EOPNOTSUPP
if the security module does not handle/manage the xattr, or a -errno
upon an error.

> 
> If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
> xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
> will be aborted.

Not sure I understand the benefit of the 0 vs -EOPNOTSUPP distinction.

> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c    |  7 +++++++
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/security.h  |  6 ++++++
>  security/security.c       |  8 ++++++++
>  4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index 8ebea18..68cefb2 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ retry:
>  			goto retry;
>  		}
>  
> +		error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
> +		if (error < 0 && error != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +			break;
> +		if (error == 1) {
> +			error = 0;
> +			continue; /* Discard */
> +		}
>  		error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
>  		if (error)
>  			break;
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index c1f95be..84caead 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -410,6 +410,14 @@
>   *	@src indicates the union dentry of file that is being copied up.
>   *	@new pointer to pointer to return newly allocated creds.
>   *	Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
> + * @inode_copy_up_xattr:
> + *	Filter the xattrs being copied up when a unioned file is copied
> + *	up from a lower layer to the union/overlay layer.
> + *	@name indicates the name of the xattr.
> + *	Returns 0 to accept the xattr, 1 to discard the xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if
> + *	security module does not know about attribute or a negative error code
> + *	to abort the copy up. Note that the caller is responsible for reading
> + *	and writing the xattrs as this hook is merely a filter.
>   *
>   * Security hooks for file operations
>   *
> @@ -1435,6 +1443,7 @@ union security_list_options {
>  					size_t buffer_size);
>  	void (*inode_getsecid)(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
>  	int (*inode_copy_up) (struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
> +	int (*inode_copy_up_xattr) (const char *name);
>  
>  	int (*file_permission)(struct file *file, int mask);
>  	int (*file_alloc_security)(struct file *file);
> @@ -1707,6 +1716,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
>  	struct list_head inode_listsecurity;
>  	struct list_head inode_getsecid;
>  	struct list_head inode_copy_up;
> +	struct list_head inode_copy_up_xattr;
>  	struct list_head file_permission;
>  	struct list_head file_alloc_security;
>  	struct list_head file_free_security;
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index c976d79..08d3191 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void
>  int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
>  void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
>  int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
> +int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
>  int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
>  int security_file_alloc(struct file *file);
>  void security_file_free(struct file *file);
> @@ -764,6 +765,11 @@ static inline int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> +{
> +	-EOPNOTSUPP;

return?

> +}
> +
>  static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 3d142aa..3321e31 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
>  
> +int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> +{
> +	return call_int_hook(inode_copy_up_xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP, name);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up_xattr);
> +
>  int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1671,6 +1677,8 @@ struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads = {
>  		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid),
>  	.inode_copy_up =
>  		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up),
> +	.inode_copy_up_xattr =
> +		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr),
>  	.file_permission =
>  		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.file_permission),
>  	.file_alloc_security =
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Vivek Goyal July 11, 2016, 4:56 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:31:47AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 12:19 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
> > copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
> > to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
> > claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
> > wrong.
> 
> 0 if the security module wants the xattr to be copied up, 1 if the
> security module wants the xattr to be discarded on the copy, -EOPNOTSUPP
> if the security module does not handle/manage the xattr, or a -errno
> upon an error.

Ok, will change the description.

> 
> > 
> > If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
> > xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
> > will be aborted.
> 
> Not sure I understand the benefit of the 0 vs -EOPNOTSUPP distinction.

I am not sure either. Casey wanted to have four states so I introduced it. 

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Vivek Goyal July 11, 2016, 5:02 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:31:47AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:

[..]
> > +static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +	-EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> return?

Yes, this one I fixed it in my patches now. kbuild also flagged this.

Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index 8ebea18..68cefb2 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -103,6 +103,13 @@  retry:
 			goto retry;
 		}
 
+		error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
+		if (error < 0 && error != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+			break;
+		if (error == 1) {
+			error = 0;
+			continue; /* Discard */
+		}
 		error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
 		if (error)
 			break;
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index c1f95be..84caead 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -410,6 +410,14 @@ 
  *	@src indicates the union dentry of file that is being copied up.
  *	@new pointer to pointer to return newly allocated creds.
  *	Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
+ * @inode_copy_up_xattr:
+ *	Filter the xattrs being copied up when a unioned file is copied
+ *	up from a lower layer to the union/overlay layer.
+ *	@name indicates the name of the xattr.
+ *	Returns 0 to accept the xattr, 1 to discard the xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if
+ *	security module does not know about attribute or a negative error code
+ *	to abort the copy up. Note that the caller is responsible for reading
+ *	and writing the xattrs as this hook is merely a filter.
  *
  * Security hooks for file operations
  *
@@ -1435,6 +1443,7 @@  union security_list_options {
 					size_t buffer_size);
 	void (*inode_getsecid)(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
 	int (*inode_copy_up) (struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+	int (*inode_copy_up_xattr) (const char *name);
 
 	int (*file_permission)(struct file *file, int mask);
 	int (*file_alloc_security)(struct file *file);
@@ -1707,6 +1716,7 @@  struct security_hook_heads {
 	struct list_head inode_listsecurity;
 	struct list_head inode_getsecid;
 	struct list_head inode_copy_up;
+	struct list_head inode_copy_up_xattr;
 	struct list_head file_permission;
 	struct list_head file_alloc_security;
 	struct list_head file_free_security;
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index c976d79..08d3191 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@  int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void
 int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
 void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
 int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
 int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
 int security_file_alloc(struct file *file);
 void security_file_free(struct file *file);
@@ -764,6 +765,11 @@  static inline int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+	-EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 3d142aa..3321e31 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -733,6 +733,12 @@  int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
 
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+	return call_int_hook(inode_copy_up_xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP, name);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up_xattr);
+
 int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -1671,6 +1677,8 @@  struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads = {
 		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid),
 	.inode_copy_up =
 		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up),
+	.inode_copy_up_xattr =
+		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr),
 	.file_permission =
 		LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.file_permission),
 	.file_alloc_security =