| Message ID | 1479117656-12403-5-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and > tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable > to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from > the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register > is dropped. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put this into the pull request. /Jarkko > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 31 +++++-------------------------- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 3 +++ > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > index d0c1872..250a651 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > @@ -276,28 +276,6 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > up_write(&chip->ops_sem); > } > > -static int tpm1_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) > -{ > - int rc; > - > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > - return 0; > - > - tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip); > - > - rc = tpm_bios_log_setup(chip); > - > - return rc; > -} > - > -static void tpm1_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip) > -{ > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > - return; > - > - tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); > -} > - > static void tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > struct attribute **i; > @@ -364,7 +342,9 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) > return rc; > } > > - rc = tpm1_chip_register(chip); > + tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip); > + > + rc = tpm_bios_log_setup(chip); > if (rc) > return rc; > > @@ -372,7 +352,7 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > rc = tpm_add_char_device(chip); > if (rc) { > - tpm1_chip_unregister(chip); > + tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); > return rc; > } > > @@ -402,8 +382,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_register); > void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip); > - > - tpm1_chip_unregister(chip); > + tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); > tpm_del_char_device(chip); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > index 59a1ead..848ad65 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c > @@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group tpm_dev_group = { > > void tpm_sysfs_add_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > + return; > + > /* The sysfs routines rely on an implicit tpm_try_get_ops, device_del > * is called before ops is null'd and the sysfs core synchronizes this > * removal so that no callbacks are running or can run again > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c > index 62e9da6..57ac862 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c > @@ -373,6 +373,9 @@ int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip) > const char *name = dev_name(&chip->dev); > unsigned int cnt; > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > + return 0; > + > cnt = 0; > chip->bios_dir[cnt] = securityfs_create_dir(name, NULL); > if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[cnt])) > -- > 2.5.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and > > tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable > > to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from > > the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register > > is dropped. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > > This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here > so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put > this into the pull request. I tested it on my ARM system when I tested your branch. I think it looks better this way.. Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/22/2016 10:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: >>> Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and >>> tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable >>> to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from >>> the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register >>> is dropped. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> >> >> This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here >> so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put >> this into the pull request. > > I tested it on my ARM system when I tested your branch. > > I think it looks better this way.. > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> > > Jason > From my side also, as part of testing the whole patchset, I have tested this patch. Tested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks & Regards, - Nayna -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and > > > tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable > > > to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from > > > the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register > > > is dropped. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > > > > This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here > > so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put > > this into the pull request. > > I tested it on my ARM system when I tested your branch. > > I think it looks better this way.. > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Thanks. I'll also add tested-by from you then. /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:03:39AM +0530, Nayna wrote: > > > On 11/22/2016 10:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > > Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and > > > > tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable > > > > to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from > > > > the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register > > > > is dropped. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here > > > so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put > > > this into the pull request. > > > > I tested it on my ARM system when I tested your branch. > > > > I think it looks better this way.. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> > > > > Jason > > > > From my side also, as part of testing the whole patchset, I have tested this > patch. > > Tested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Thanks & Regards, > - Nayna Thanks Nayna! I'll go on creating pull request... /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c index d0c1872..250a651 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c @@ -276,28 +276,6 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) up_write(&chip->ops_sem); } -static int tpm1_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) -{ - int rc; - - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) - return 0; - - tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip); - - rc = tpm_bios_log_setup(chip); - - return rc; -} - -static void tpm1_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip) -{ - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) - return; - - tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); -} - static void tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(struct tpm_chip *chip) { struct attribute **i; @@ -364,7 +342,9 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) return rc; } - rc = tpm1_chip_register(chip); + tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip); + + rc = tpm_bios_log_setup(chip); if (rc) return rc; @@ -372,7 +352,7 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) rc = tpm_add_char_device(chip); if (rc) { - tpm1_chip_unregister(chip); + tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); return rc; } @@ -402,8 +382,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_register); void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chip *chip) { tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip); - - tpm1_chip_unregister(chip); + tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); tpm_del_char_device(chip); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister); diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c index 59a1ead..848ad65 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c @@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group tpm_dev_group = { void tpm_sysfs_add_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) { + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) + return; + /* The sysfs routines rely on an implicit tpm_try_get_ops, device_del * is called before ops is null'd and the sysfs core synchronizes this * removal so that no callbacks are running or can run again diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c index 62e9da6..57ac862 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c @@ -373,6 +373,9 @@ int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip) const char *name = dev_name(&chip->dev); unsigned int cnt; + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) + return 0; + cnt = 0; chip->bios_dir[cnt] = securityfs_create_dir(name, NULL); if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register is dropped. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 31 +++++-------------------------- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 3 +++ drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)