diff mbox series

[-next] LSM: Make some functions static

Message ID 1547617472-60140-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [-next] LSM: Make some functions static | expand

Commit Message

Wei Yongjun Jan. 16, 2019, 5:44 a.m. UTC
Fixes the following sparse warnings:

security/security.c:533:5: warning:
 symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
security/security.c:554:5: warning:
 symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
security/security.c:575:5: warning:
 symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: f4ad8f2c4076 ("LSM: Infrastructure management of the task security")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
---
 security/security.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

James Morris Jan. 18, 2019, 7:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Wei Yongjun wrote:

> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> security/security.c:533:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:554:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:575:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: f4ad8f2c4076 ("LSM: Infrastructure management of the task security")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  security/security.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Casey, please review these fixes for your patchset.

> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 9a98c52..750d3f3 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> +static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
>  		task->security = NULL;
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
> +static int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_ipc == 0) {
>  		kip->security = NULL;
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
> +static int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg == 0) {
>  		mp->security = NULL;
> 
> 
>
Casey Schaufler Jan. 18, 2019, 7:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On 1/15/2019 9:44 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
>
> security/security.c:533:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:554:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:575:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: f4ad8f2c4076 ("LSM: Infrastructure management of the task security")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

> ---
>  security/security.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 9a98c52..750d3f3 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> +static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
>  		task->security = NULL;
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
> +static int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_ipc == 0) {
>  		kip->security = NULL;
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
>   *
>   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
>   */
> -int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
> +static int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
>  {
>  	if (blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg == 0) {
>  		mp->security = NULL;
>
>
>
>
James Morris Jan. 18, 2019, 7:47 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Wei Yongjun wrote:

> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> security/security.c:533:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:554:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> security/security.c:575:5: warning:
>  symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: f4ad8f2c4076 ("LSM: Infrastructure management of the task security")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git next-general
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 9a98c52..750d3f3 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@  int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
  *
  * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
  */
-int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
+static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
 		task->security = NULL;
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@  int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
  *
  * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
  */
-int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
+static int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
 {
 	if (blob_sizes.lbs_ipc == 0) {
 		kip->security = NULL;
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@  int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
  *
  * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
  */
-int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
+static int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
 {
 	if (blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg == 0) {
 		mp->security = NULL;