diff mbox series

netlabel: fix our progress tracking in netlbl_unlabel_staticlist()

Message ID 160484450633.3752.16512718263560813473.stgit@sifl (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series netlabel: fix our progress tracking in netlbl_unlabel_staticlist() | expand

Commit Message

Paul Moore Nov. 8, 2020, 2:08 p.m. UTC
The current NetLabel code doesn't correctly keep track of the netlink
dump state in some cases, in particular when multiple interfaces with
large configurations are loaded.  The problem manifests itself by not
reporting the full configuration to userspace, even though it is
loaded and active in the kernel.  This patch fixes this by ensuring
that the dump state is properly reset when necessary inside the
netlbl_unlabel_staticlist() function.

Fixes: 8cc44579d1bd ("NetLabel: Introduce static network labels for unlabeled connections")
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski Nov. 10, 2020, 11:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:08:26 -0500 Paul Moore wrote:
> The current NetLabel code doesn't correctly keep track of the netlink
> dump state in some cases, in particular when multiple interfaces with
> large configurations are loaded.  The problem manifests itself by not
> reporting the full configuration to userspace, even though it is
> loaded and active in the kernel.  This patch fixes this by ensuring
> that the dump state is properly reset when necessary inside the
> netlbl_unlabel_staticlist() function.
> 
> Fixes: 8cc44579d1bd ("NetLabel: Introduce static network labels for unlabeled connections")
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

Applied to net, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index 2e8e3f7b2111..fc55c9116da0 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1166,12 +1166,13 @@  static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct netlbl_unlhsh_walk_arg cb_arg;
 	u32 skip_bkt = cb->args[0];
 	u32 skip_chain = cb->args[1];
-	u32 iter_bkt;
-	u32 iter_chain = 0, iter_addr4 = 0, iter_addr6 = 0;
+	u32 skip_addr4 = cb->args[2];
+	u32 iter_bkt, iter_chain, iter_addr4 = 0, iter_addr6 = 0;
 	struct netlbl_unlhsh_iface *iface;
 	struct list_head *iter_list;
 	struct netlbl_af4list *addr4;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	u32 skip_addr6 = cb->args[3];
 	struct netlbl_af6list *addr6;
 #endif
 
@@ -1182,7 +1183,7 @@  static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for (iter_bkt = skip_bkt;
 	     iter_bkt < rcu_dereference(netlbl_unlhsh)->size;
-	     iter_bkt++, iter_chain = 0, iter_addr4 = 0, iter_addr6 = 0) {
+	     iter_bkt++) {
 		iter_list = &rcu_dereference(netlbl_unlhsh)->tbl[iter_bkt];
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(iface, iter_list, list) {
 			if (!iface->valid ||
@@ -1190,7 +1191,7 @@  static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				continue;
 			netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu(addr4,
 						   &iface->addr4_list) {
-				if (iter_addr4++ < cb->args[2])
+				if (iter_addr4++ < skip_addr4)
 					continue;
 				if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(
 					      NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLIST,
@@ -1203,10 +1204,12 @@  static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					goto unlabel_staticlist_return;
 				}
 			}
+			iter_addr4 = 0;
+			skip_addr4 = 0;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 			netlbl_af6list_foreach_rcu(addr6,
 						   &iface->addr6_list) {
-				if (iter_addr6++ < cb->args[3])
+				if (iter_addr6++ < skip_addr6)
 					continue;
 				if (netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(
 					      NLBL_UNLABEL_C_STATICLIST,
@@ -1219,8 +1222,12 @@  static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					goto unlabel_staticlist_return;
 				}
 			}
+			iter_addr6 = 0;
+			skip_addr6 = 0;
 #endif /* IPv6 */
 		}
+		iter_chain = 0;
+		skip_chain = 0;
 	}
 
 unlabel_staticlist_return: