diff mbox

[v5,4/5] ima: Use tpm_default_chip() and call TPM functions with a tpm_chip

Message ID 20180626110619.2362791-5-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefan Berger June 26, 2018, 11:06 a.m. UTC
Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a
hold of a tpm_chip and access the TPM functions using it.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h        |  1 +
 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c   | 11 ++++-------
 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c  |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Jarkko Sakkinen June 26, 2018, 1:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 07:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
> the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a
> hold of a tpm_chip and access the TPM functions using it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

(i.e. LGTM but competence to give a detailed review).

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 354bb5716ce3..35409461a3f2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@  extern int ima_policy_flag;
 extern int ima_used_chip;
 extern int ima_hash_algo;
 extern int ima_appraise;
+extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
 
 /* IMA event related data */
 struct ima_event_data {
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
index 4e085a17124f..88082f35adb2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@  static void __init ima_pcrread(int idx, u8 *pcr)
 	if (!ima_used_chip)
 		return;
 
-	if (tpm_pcr_read(NULL, idx, pcr) != 0)
+	if (tpm_pcr_read(ima_tpm_chip, idx, pcr) != 0)
 		pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip\n");
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 29b72cd2502e..1437ed3dbccc 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ 
 /* name for boot aggregate entry */
 static const char *boot_aggregate_name = "boot_aggregate";
 int ima_used_chip;
+struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
 
 /* Add the boot aggregate to the IMA measurement list and extend
  * the PCR register.
@@ -106,17 +107,13 @@  void __init ima_load_x509(void)
 
 int __init ima_init(void)
 {
-	u8 pcr_i[TPM_DIGEST_SIZE];
 	int rc;
 
-	ima_used_chip = 0;
-	rc = tpm_pcr_read(NULL, 0, pcr_i);
-	if (rc == 0)
-		ima_used_chip = 1;
+	ima_tpm_chip = tpm_default_chip();
 
+	ima_used_chip = ima_tpm_chip != NULL;
 	if (!ima_used_chip)
-		pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass! (rc=%d)\n",
-			rc);
+		pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass!\n");
 
 	rc = integrity_init_keyring(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA);
 	if (rc)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
index 418f35e38015..c6303fa19a49 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@  static int ima_pcr_extend(const u8 *hash, int pcr)
 	if (!ima_used_chip)
 		return result;
 
-	result = tpm_pcr_extend(NULL, pcr, hash);
+	result = tpm_pcr_extend(ima_tpm_chip, pcr, hash);
 	if (result != 0)
 		pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip, result: %d\n", result);
 	return result;