From patchwork Wed Aug 12 19:31:01 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tushar Sugandhi X-Patchwork-Id: 11711257 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A62138C for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA4E206DA for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="MIxMEJeI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726685AbgHLTb1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:31:27 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:51170 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726681AbgHLTbO (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:31:14 -0400 Received: from tusharsu-Ubuntu.lan (c-71-197-163-6.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.163.6]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C4B120B490D; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 3C4B120B490D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1597260672; bh=1JH4jChNS0fa5DFFMyXyCP3gvcSLfR3XN5s6YUWp8Eg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MIxMEJeISvTQ7NN5IisP4jWYFX4zFj3WHpvnd+9p1LDZgpMXGC+bckHZqRClUr+Nc PkHUFZMNpr92w7Aw0Xl258nJ9C9Be+thQmt+eyIUo9K5LrICU+WDKg59D7I6nKZvdI vY8c9rsHafodvjTnRv3J4EINhRMUu2+9wRaRHmpY= From: Tushar Sugandhi To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, gmazyland@gmail.com Cc: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, sashal@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [PATCH 2/3] IMA: add policy to support measuring critical data from kernel components Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:31:01 -0700 Message-Id: <20200812193102.18636-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200812193102.18636-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20200812193102.18636-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: There would be several candidate kernel components suitable for IMA measurement. Not all of them would be enlightened for IMA measurement. Also, system administrators may not want to measure data for all of them, even when they are enlightened for IMA measurements. An IMA policy specific to various kernel components is needed to measure their respective critical data. Add a new IMA policy CRITICAL_DATA+data_sources to support measuring various critical kernel components. This policy would enable the system administrators to limit the measurement to the components, if the components are enlightened for IMA measurement. Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 6 +- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index cd572912c593..a0dd0f108555 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Description: base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][CREDS_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK] [FIRMWARE_CHECK] [KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK] - [KEXEC_CMDLINE] [KEY_CHECK] + [KEXEC_CMDLINE] [KEY_CHECK] [CRITICAL_DATA] mask:= [[^]MAY_READ] [[^]MAY_WRITE] [[^]MAY_APPEND] [[^]MAY_EXEC] fsmagic:= hex value @@ -125,3 +125,7 @@ Description: keys added to .builtin_trusted_keys or .ima keyring: measure func=KEY_CHECK keyrings=.builtin_trusted_keys|.ima + + Example of measure rule using CRITICAL_DATA to measure critical data + + measure func=CRITICAL_DATA data_sources=selinux|apparmor|dm-crypt diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index e2a151d6653d..99773dfa2541 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ima_hash_key(u8 *digest) hook(POLICY_CHECK, policy) \ hook(KEXEC_CMDLINE, kexec_cmdline) \ hook(KEY_CHECK, key) \ + hook(CRITICAL_DATA, critical_data) \ hook(MAX_CHECK, none) #define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM, str) ENUM, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index af218babd198..9917e1730cb6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * subj=, obj=, type=, func=, mask=, fsmagic= * subj,obj, and type: are LSM specific. * func: FILE_CHECK | BPRM_CHECK | CREDS_CHECK | MMAP_CHECK | MODULE_CHECK - * | KEXEC_CMDLINE | KEY_CHECK + * | KEXEC_CMDLINE | KEY_CHECK | CRITICAL_DATA * mask: contains the permission mask * fsmagic: hex value * diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 4efaf8956eb8..8451ccb2a775 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -22,17 +22,18 @@ #include "ima.h" /* flags definitions */ -#define IMA_FUNC 0x0001 -#define IMA_MASK 0x0002 -#define IMA_FSMAGIC 0x0004 -#define IMA_UID 0x0008 -#define IMA_FOWNER 0x0010 -#define IMA_FSUUID 0x0020 -#define IMA_INMASK 0x0040 -#define IMA_EUID 0x0080 -#define IMA_PCR 0x0100 -#define IMA_FSNAME 0x0200 -#define IMA_KEYRINGS 0x0400 +#define IMA_FUNC 0x0001 +#define IMA_MASK 0x0002 +#define IMA_FSMAGIC 0x0004 +#define IMA_UID 0x0008 +#define IMA_FOWNER 0x0010 +#define IMA_FSUUID 0x0020 +#define IMA_INMASK 0x0040 +#define IMA_EUID 0x0080 +#define IMA_PCR 0x0100 +#define IMA_FSNAME 0x0200 +#define IMA_KEYRINGS 0x0400 +#define IMA_DATA_SOURCES 0x0800 #define UNKNOWN 0 #define MEASURE 0x0001 /* same as IMA_MEASURE */ @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry { } lsm[MAX_LSM_RULES]; char *fsname; struct ima_rule_opt_list *keyrings; /* Measure keys added to these keyrings */ + struct ima_rule_opt_list *data_sources; /* Measure data from these sources */ struct ima_template_desc *template; }; @@ -508,14 +510,23 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, { int i; - if (func == KEY_CHECK) { - return (rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func == func) && - ima_match_rule_data(rule, rule->keyrings, func_data, - true, cred); - } if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func != func && func != POST_SETATTR)) return false; + + switch (func) { + case KEY_CHECK: + return ((rule->func == func) && + ima_match_rule_data(rule, rule->keyrings, + func_data, true, cred)); + case CRITICAL_DATA: + return ((rule->func == func) && + ima_match_rule_data(rule, rule->data_sources, + func_data, false, cred)); + default: + break; + } + if ((rule->flags & IMA_MASK) && (rule->mask != mask && func != POST_SETATTR)) return false; @@ -911,7 +922,7 @@ enum { Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt, Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings, - Opt_err + Opt_data_sources, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -948,6 +959,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"}, {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, {Opt_keyrings, "keyrings=%s"}, + {Opt_data_sources, "data_sources=%s"}, {Opt_err, NULL} }; @@ -1110,6 +1122,19 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) if (ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry)) return false; + break; + case CRITICAL_DATA: + if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE)) + return false; + + if (!(entry->flags & IMA_DATA_SOURCES) || + (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_UID | IMA_PCR | + IMA_DATA_SOURCES))) + return false; + + if (ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry)) + return false; + break; default: return false; @@ -1242,6 +1267,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) && strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0) entry->func = KEY_CHECK; + else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "CRITICAL_DATA") == 0) + entry->func = CRITICAL_DATA; else result = -EINVAL; if (!result) @@ -1312,6 +1339,23 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) entry->flags |= IMA_KEYRINGS; break; + case Opt_data_sources: + ima_log_string(ab, "data_sources", args[0].from); + + if (entry->data_sources) { + result = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + entry->data_sources = ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(args); + if (IS_ERR(entry->data_sources)) { + result = PTR_ERR(entry->data_sources); + entry->data_sources = NULL; + break; + } + + entry->flags |= IMA_DATA_SOURCES; + break; case Opt_fsuuid: ima_log_string(ab, "fsuuid", args[0].from); @@ -1692,6 +1736,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_puts(m, " "); } + if (entry->flags & IMA_DATA_SOURCES) { + seq_puts(m, "data_sources="); + ima_show_rule_opt_list(m, entry->data_sources); + seq_puts(m, " "); + } + if (entry->flags & IMA_PCR) { snprintf(tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), "%d", entry->pcr); seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_pcr), tbuf);