[v1,1/3] ima: define ima_trusted_for hook

Commit Message

Mimi Zohar Oct. 14, 2021, 1:01 p.m. UTC

A major interpreter integrity gap exists which allows files read by
the interpreter to be executed without measuring the file or verifying
the file's signature.

The kernel has no knowledge about the file being read by the interpreter.
Only the interpreter knows the context(eg. data, execute) and must be
trusted to provide that information accurately.

To close this integrity gap, define an ima_trusted_for hook to allow
IMA to measure the file and verify the file's signature based on policy.

Sample policy rules:
	measure func=TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK
	appraise func=TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK appraise_type=imasig

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <[e-mail]>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h         |  1 +
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c  |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
index e1a04bd3b9e5..85618e726801 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@  Description:
 				[FIRMWARE_CHECK]
 				[KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK]
 				[KEXEC_CMDLINE] [KEY_CHECK] [CRITICAL_DATA]
-				[SETXATTR_CHECK]
+				[SETXATTR_CHECK] [TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK]
 			mask:= [[^]MAY_READ] [[^]MAY_WRITE] [[^]MAY_APPEND]
 			       [[^]MAY_EXEC]
 			fsmagic:= hex value
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index be965a8715e4..827236dbbefb 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@  static inline unsigned int ima_hash_key(u8 *digest)
 	hook(KEY_CHECK, key)				\
 	hook(CRITICAL_DATA, critical_data)		\
 	hook(SETXATTR_CHECK, setxattr_check)		\
+	hook(TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK, trusted_for_check)	\
 	hook(MAX_CHECK, none)
 
 #define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM, str)	ENUM,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 465865412100..e09054ac3352 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/ima.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/trusted-for.h>
 
 #include "ima.h"
 
@@ -519,6 +520,28 @@  int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check);
 
+/**
+ * ima_trusted_for - based on policy, measure/appraise/audit measurement
+ * @file: pointer to the file to be measured/appraised/audit
+ * @usage: limit enumeration to TRUSTED_FOR_EXECUTION
+ *
+ * Measure/appraise/audit files being executed by an interpreter.
+ *
+ * On success return 0.  On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
+ * is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
+ */
+int ima_trusted_for(struct file *file, const enum trusted_for_usage usage)
+{
+	u32 secid;
+
+	if (usage != TRUSTED_FOR_EXECUTION)
+		return 0;
+
+	security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &secid);
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL,
+				   0, MAY_EXEC, TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK);
+}
+
 static int __ima_inode_hash(struct inode *inode, char *buf, size_t buf_size)
 {
 	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 320ca80aacab..847803a24201 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1210,6 +1210,7 @@  static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 	case POST_SETATTR:
 	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
 	case POLICY_CHECK:
+	case TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK:
 		if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK | IMA_FSMAGIC |
 				     IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID |
 				     IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR |
@@ -1423,6 +1424,8 @@  static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			/* PATH_CHECK is for backwards compat */
 			else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "PATH_CHECK") == 0)
 				entry->func = FILE_CHECK;
+			else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK") == 0)
+				entry->func = TRUSTED_FOR_CHECK;
 			else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "MODULE_CHECK") == 0)
 				entry->func = MODULE_CHECK;
 			else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "FIRMWARE_CHECK") == 0)