From patchwork Mon Apr 8 09:39:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mikhail Ivanov X-Patchwork-Id: 13620902 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969A24645B; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712569223; cv=none; b=DH0znytqg8dHuCsb0gBWlHuXdI3ihIF/j07zaSI1jH1v295kWl/occpETZxAlCHaEUYnpGRTPDBBhAM8wOkaP7lUvS4D6HZOqw7hmiPTWplVSxFisae9ZOWk5558a1OPBl1txMdbgQaiU/Qkokldv/oe/5Fxb+RVXi/Mnpp09R0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712569223; c=relaxed/simple; bh=drN9bL8JdjKHCjq13VMq/OXZxDd2Gc+wVCkJQC4rqf8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VPSZGJEn916cTwHZClGtekzvto5bAHc9aYXPcwALh7kjNC9QxHFTcWUvQ5uCkp9jlh2Q6YWUVVDL9tw6xow2BiddEAf0Vses900r8RIUAj7ZHZrOMjSizpbEvsMdlKeZ0t6HzNiZtyfCAg2309e1wPQNO7DBL4VGhb3WZgKljgQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VCkZV30KYz1GGKc; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:39:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.49]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495E51A0172; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:40:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from mscphis02103.huawei.com (10.123.65.215) by dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:40:12 +0800 From: Ivanov Mikhail To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] selftests/landlock: Create 'rule_with_unknown_access' test Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:39:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20240408093927.1759381-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240408093927.1759381-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> References: <20240408093927.1759381-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: mscpeml100003.china.huawei.com (10.199.174.67) To dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Ivanov Mikhail Reviewed-by: Konstantin Meskhidze --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index 7f31594bf..5577b08d5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -223,4 +223,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .domain = self->srv0.protocol.domain, + .type = self->srv0.protocol.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN