[-next] apparmor: Remove unused parameter L1 in macro next_comb

Commit Message

Jinjie Ruan Sept. 2, 2024, 7:39 a.m. UTC

In the macro definition of next_comb(), a parameter L1 is accepted,
but it is not used. Hence, it should be removed.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <[e-mail]>
---
 security/apparmor/include/label.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/label.h b/security/apparmor/include/label.h
index 2a72e6b17d68..2635eef0ae2b 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/label.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/label.h
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@  int aa_label_next_confined(struct aa_label *l, int i);
 #define label_for_each_cont(I, L, P)					\
 	for (++((I).i); ((P) = (L)->vec[(I).i]); ++((I).i))
 
-#define next_comb(I, L1, L2)						\
+#define next_comb(I, L2)						\
 do {									\
 	(I).j++;							\
 	if ((I).j >= (L2)->size) {					\
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@  do {									\
 #define label_for_each_comb(I, L1, L2, P1, P2)				\
 for ((I).i = (I).j = 0;							\
 	((P1) = (L1)->vec[(I).i]) && ((P2) = (L2)->vec[(I).j]);		\
-	(I) = next_comb(I, L1, L2))
+	(I) = next_comb(I, L2))
 
 #define fn_for_each_comb(L1, L2, P1, P2, FN)				\
 ({									\