From patchwork Wed Sep 4 10:48:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mikhail Ivanov X-Patchwork-Id: 13790475 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939791CFECB; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725446927; cv=none; b=NjpFGJY96Mh2wKuJm9f9ZjHtsots+eVFyXpsSC+Oyq57G/N4jknBlrLX2aH13I2MM9kYA1qKQPbzSpxA4aarAskALUiLfTBW+tPfzTCxkaXA7+pni3kiRoz/ZdaNk8aLraewiffrBdtHDLw6/8KcVe50XWjJluGddCvO+OSW3oM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725446927; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DMWIp23DCEJuE85kq8d8o/CuzEiXpGfF0Ueszsrw4oE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dhrgwuqAyvWigfmw2CtuhX1y5U5AvZOXX+Cg9K3TWFxgSU4RD9FvdVZc+ND7O3ObTzZqKbkQsCZVMmOr1KV3OXdVlegcK3JAVmytrxfUwUrsnihWsXKa4wQPn4FkNkNYj3KAbzga9oP/JDqVr2ImBj0cD3JElJn+3RTbwvychGk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WzJzZ6cDpz1HJ8y; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:45:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemj200016.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.194.28]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651601402CC; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:48:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from mscphis02103.huawei.com (10.123.65.215) by kwepemj200016.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:48:40 +0800 From: Mikhail Ivanov To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 05/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule for each unknown access Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:48:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20240904104824.1844082-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240904104824.1844082-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> References: <20240904104824.1844082-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: mscpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.250) To kwepemj200016.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.28) Add test that validates behaviour of Landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov Reviewed-by: Günther Noack --- Changes since v2: * Replaces EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ for close(). * Refactors commit title. Changes since v1: * Refactors commit messsage. --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index cb23efd3ccc9..811bdaa95a7a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -325,4 +325,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .family = self->prot.family, + .type = self->prot.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN