From patchwork Thu Mar 20 19:07:15 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= X-Patchwork-Id: 14024470 X-Patchwork-Delegate: paul@paul-moore.com Received: from smtp-190e.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-190e.mail.infomaniak.ch [185.125.25.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562C8229B3C for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.125.25.14 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742497690; cv=none; b=er1fXuCDQ/M2+TQJcgFmba+957UjYIzjQahPw4JKCE048Sbsfi75WMmw45dok4xNBCWmKymtf/3XQjgoL48Tm74pOgdYDOt7h7dZ2Is5tl30bHHg1px/IwrWqAbMVyG1yfsedXywc/V//QfJUCSbYVioagc0KPCsWNX9UWQBzd8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742497690; c=relaxed/simple; bh=llAxyH2rc04bg55OSoGriL7EdVHgVfd/Sz72lTje0Ng=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RmchMiglwgdB9Pn7VusDZb544kx49AAVYoumhJpwf6enIQirCz+bnllP8IwxUMJipOe7fLAoInvgg9Xkt2Wzy4RH1GZEHl6k8J+lBr/Bib8mGZ6N7oqfQ4lWeKJepc2k/wDl/jPgyHxQUmaE4uPcYhXvHf4pt0g3TeDkpu3ZxUA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b=vmKP3loG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.125.25.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=digikod.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digikod.net header.i=@digikod.net header.b="vmKP3loG" Received: from smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [IPv6:2001:1600:4:17::246c]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZJZps6vgxz1Jl; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:08:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digikod.net; s=20191114; t=1742497685; bh=iwqk7NYrXhgHM7Wx3NCCghBTb/VvlWEG4icbWaIxWZg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vmKP3loGhR+VJVh0442n9Kun0gukj4fhCEnxoHcvYy2KwpeIvFY+lTWYNZmOirnyl kriub66uGpYoDEGgiWlth+c97KlzUCCa2IXZbsokYADix4fSqxMN2jdtoPSJJu40fH 30yLAD7SG9RKBpU3fY8hFTuPT7j1hYRFK8kCo5+8= Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4ZJZpr6mBlzCJ2; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:08:04 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= To: Eric Paris , Paul Moore , =?utf-8?q?G=C3=BCnther_Noack?= , "Serge E . Hallyn" Cc: =?utf-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , Ben Scarlato , Casey Schaufler , Charles Zaffery , Daniel Burgener , Francis Laniel , James Morris , Jann Horn , Jeff Xu , Jorge Lucangeli Obes , Kees Cook , Konstantin Meskhidze , Matt Bobrowski , Matthieu Buffet , Mikhail Ivanov , Phil Sutter , Praveen K Paladugu , Robert Salvet , Shervin Oloumi , Song Liu , Tahera Fahimi , Tingmao Wang , Tyler Hicks , audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v7 26/28] selftests/landlock: Add audit tests for filesystem Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:07:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20250320190717.2287696-27-mic@digikod.net> In-Reply-To: <20250320190717.2287696-1-mic@digikod.net> References: <20250320190717.2287696-1-mic@digikod.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha Test all filesystem blockers, including events with several records, and record with several blockers: - fs.execute - fs.write_file - fs.read_file - fs_read_dir - fs.remove_dir - fs.remove_file - fs.make_char - fs.make_dir - fs.make_reg - fs.make_sock - fs.make_fifo - fs.make_block - fs.make_sym - fs.refer - fs.truncate - fs.ioctl_dev - fs.change_topology Cc: Günther Noack Cc: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün --- Changes since v6: - Check audit_count_records() calls for audit errors. - Add regression test for commit d617f0d72d80 ("landlock: Optimize file path walks and prepare for audit support"). - Add test_rename and test_exchange tests. - Check domain allocation interwinded record. - Add the execute_make test. - Use a set of access rights instead of only one to make sure only the relevant access rights are blocked and logged. - Add new audit_layout1.mount test. - Add comments. Changes since v5: - New patch. --- tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit.h | 35 ++ tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h | 16 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 594 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 645 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit.h b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit.h index 08a5c53bd6f5..b9054086a0c9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/audit.h @@ -208,6 +208,41 @@ static int audit_set_status(int fd, __u32 key, __u32 val) return audit_request(fd, &msg, NULL); } +/* Returns a pointer to the last filled character of @dst, which is `\0`. */ +static __maybe_unused char *regex_escape(const char *const src, char *dst, + size_t dst_size) +{ + char *d = dst; + + for (const char *s = src; *s; s++) { + switch (*s) { + case '$': + case '*': + case '.': + case '[': + case '\\': + case ']': + case '^': + if (d >= dst + dst_size - 2) + return (char *)-ENOMEM; + + *d++ = '\\'; + *d++ = *s; + break; + default: + if (d >= dst + dst_size - 1) + return (char *)-ENOMEM; + + *d++ = *s; + } + } + if (d >= dst + dst_size - 1) + return (char *)-ENOMEM; + + *d = '\0'; + return d; +} + /* * @domain_id: The domain ID extracted from the audit message (if the first part * of @pattern is REGEX_LANDLOCK_PREFIX). It is set to 0 if the domain ID is diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h index 6e1d143ddfa7..88a3c78f5d98 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h @@ -208,6 +208,22 @@ enforce_ruleset(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata, const int ruleset_fd) } } +static void __maybe_unused +drop_access_rights(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata, + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr *const ruleset_attr) +{ + int ruleset_fd; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(ruleset_attr, sizeof(*ruleset_attr), 0); + EXPECT_LE(0, ruleset_fd) + { + TH_LOG("Failed to create a ruleset: %s", strerror(errno)); + } + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + struct protocol_variant { int domain; int type; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c index aa6f2c1cbec7..f819011a8798 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #define _ASM_GENERIC_FCNTL_H #include +#include "audit.h" #include "common.h" #ifndef renameat2 @@ -5554,4 +5555,597 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout3_fs, release_inodes) ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(TMP_DIR, O_RDONLY)); } +static int matches_log_fs_extra(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata, + int audit_fd, const char *const blockers, + const char *const path, const char *const extra) +{ + static const char log_template[] = REGEX_LANDLOCK_PREFIX + " blockers=fs\\.%s path=\"%s\" dev=\"[^\"]\\+\" ino=[0-9]\\+$"; + char *absolute_path = NULL; + size_t log_match_remaining = sizeof(log_template) + strlen(blockers) + + PATH_MAX * 2 + + (extra ? strlen(extra) : 0) + 1; + char log_match[log_match_remaining]; + char *log_match_cursor = log_match; + size_t chunk_len; + + chunk_len = snprintf(log_match_cursor, log_match_remaining, + REGEX_LANDLOCK_PREFIX " blockers=%s path=\"", + blockers); + if (chunk_len < 0 || chunk_len >= log_match_remaining) + return -E2BIG; + + /* + * It is assume that absolute_path does not contain control characters nor + * spaces, see audit_string_contains_control(). + */ + absolute_path = realpath(path, NULL); + if (!absolute_path) + return -errno; + + log_match_remaining -= chunk_len; + log_match_cursor += chunk_len; + log_match_cursor = regex_escape(absolute_path, log_match_cursor, + log_match_remaining); + free(absolute_path); + if (log_match_cursor < 0) + return (long long)log_match_cursor; + + log_match_remaining -= log_match_cursor - log_match; + chunk_len = snprintf(log_match_cursor, log_match_remaining, + "\" dev=\"[^\"]\\+\" ino=[0-9]\\+%s$", + extra ?: ""); + if (chunk_len < 0 || chunk_len >= log_match_remaining) + return -E2BIG; + + return audit_match_record(audit_fd, AUDIT_LANDLOCK_ACCESS, log_match, + NULL); +} + +static int matches_log_fs(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata, int audit_fd, + const char *const blockers, const char *const path) +{ + return matches_log_fs_extra(_metadata, audit_fd, blockers, path, NULL); +} + +FIXTURE(audit_layout1) +{ + struct audit_filter audit_filter; + int audit_fd; +}; + +FIXTURE_SETUP(audit_layout1) +{ + prepare_layout(_metadata); + + create_layout1(_metadata); + + set_cap(_metadata, CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL); + self->audit_fd = audit_init_with_exe_filter(&self->audit_filter); + EXPECT_LE(0, self->audit_fd); + disable_caps(_metadata); +} + +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN_PARENT(audit_layout1) +{ + remove_layout1(_metadata); + + cleanup_layout(_metadata); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_cleanup(-1, NULL)); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, execute_make) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + copy_file(_metadata, bin_true, file1_s1d1); + test_execute(_metadata, 0, file1_s1d1); + test_check_exec(_metadata, 0, file1_s1d1); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, + &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE, + }); + + test_execute(_metadata, EACCES, file1_s1d1); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.execute", + file1_s1d1)); + test_check_exec(_metadata, EACCES, file1_s1d1); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.execute", + file1_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +/* + * Using a set of handled/denied access rights make it possible to check that + * only the blocked ones are logged. + */ + +/* clang-format off */ +static const __u64 access_fs_16 = + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SOCK | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV; +/* clang-format on */ + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, execute_read) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + copy_file(_metadata, bin_true, file1_s1d1); + test_execute(_metadata, 0, file1_s1d1); + test_check_exec(_metadata, 0, file1_s1d1); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + /* + * The only difference with the previous audit_layout1.execute_read test is + * the extra ",fs\\.read_file" blocked by the executable file. + */ + test_execute(_metadata, EACCES, file1_s1d1); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.execute,fs\\.read_file", file1_s1d1)); + test_check_exec(_metadata, EACCES, file1_s1d1); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.execute,fs\\.read_file", file1_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, write_file) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_WRONLY)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.write_file", file1_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, read_file) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.read_file", + file1_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, read_dir) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_DIRECTORY)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.read_dir", + dir_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, remove_dir) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file2_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, rmdir(dir_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_dir", dir_s1d2)); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, unlinkat(AT_FDCWD, dir_s1d3, AT_REMOVEDIR)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_dir", dir_s1d2)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, remove_file) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_file", dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_char) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mknod(file1_s1d3, S_IFCHR | 0644, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_char", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_dir) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mkdir(file1_s1d3, 0755)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_dir", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_reg) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mknod(file1_s1d3, S_IFREG | 0644, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_reg", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_sock) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mknod(file1_s1d3, S_IFSOCK | 0644, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_sock", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_fifo) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mknod(file1_s1d3, S_IFIFO | 0644, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_fifo", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_block) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mknod(file1_s1d3, S_IFBLK | 0644, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.make_block", dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, make_sym) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, symlink("target", file1_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.make_sym", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, refer_handled) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, link(file1_s1d1, file1_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(EXDEV, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.refer", + dir_s1d1)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_domain_allocated(self->audit_fd, NULL)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.refer", + dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, refer_make) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, + &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG | + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, link(file1_s1d1, file1_s1d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.refer", + dir_s1d1)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.make_reg,fs\\.refer", dir_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, refer_rename) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_rename(file1_s1d2, file1_s2d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_file,fs\\.refer", dir_s1d2)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_file,fs\\.make_reg,fs\\.refer", + dir_s2d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, refer_exchange) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + EXPECT_EQ(0, unlink(file1_s1d3)); + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + /* + * The only difference with the previous audit_layout1.refer_rename test is + * the extra ",fs\\.make_reg" blocked by the source directory. + */ + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_exchange(file1_s1d2, file1_s2d3)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_file,fs\\.make_reg,fs\\.refer", + dir_s1d2)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.remove_file,fs\\.make_reg,fs\\.refer", + dir_s2d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.domain); +} + +/* + * This test checks that the audit record is correctly generated when the + * operation is only partially denied. This is the case for rename(2) when the + * source file is allowed to be referenced but the destination directory is not. + * + * This is also a regression test for commit d617f0d72d80 ("landlock: Optimize + * file path walks and prepare for audit support") and commit 058518c20920 + * ("landlock: Align partial refer access checks with final ones"). + */ +TEST_F(audit_layout1, refer_rename_half) +{ + struct audit_records records; + const struct rule layer1[] = { + { + .path = dir_s2d2, + .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, + }, + {}, + }; + int ruleset_fd = + create_ruleset(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, layer1); + + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); + + ASSERT_EQ(-1, rename(dir_s1d2, dir_s2d3)); + ASSERT_EQ(EXDEV, errno); + + /* Only half of the request is denied. */ + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.refer", + dir_s1d1)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, truncate) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = access_fs_16, + }); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, truncate(file1_s1d3, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, "fs\\.truncate", + file1_s1d3)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, ioctl_dev) +{ + struct audit_records records; + int fd; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, + &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = + access_fs_16 & + ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE, + }); + + fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC); + ASSERT_LE(0, fd); + EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, ioctl_error(_metadata, fd, FIONREAD)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs_extra(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.ioctl_dev", "/dev/null", + " ioctlcmd=0x541b")); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + +TEST_F(audit_layout1, mount) +{ + struct audit_records records; + + drop_access_rights(_metadata, + &(struct landlock_ruleset_attr){ + .handled_access_fs = + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE, + }); + + set_cap(_metadata, CAP_SYS_ADMIN); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, mount(NULL, dir_s3d2, NULL, MS_RDONLY, NULL)); + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); + clear_cap(_metadata, CAP_SYS_ADMIN); + EXPECT_EQ(0, matches_log_fs(_metadata, self->audit_fd, + "fs\\.change_topology", dir_s3d2)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, audit_count_records(self->audit_fd, &records)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, records.access); + EXPECT_EQ(1, records.domain); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN