| Message ID | 20230306040037.20350-6-rdunlap@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | sh: various doc, build, init fixes | expand |
Hi Randy! On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the > kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. > > Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> > Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> > Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> > Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> > --- > v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst > v3: skipped > v4: refresh & resend > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - > Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- > scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- > tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- > tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s > > - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit > - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit > -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit > - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit > > CROSS_COMPILE This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please? Apologies that I didn't have the time earlier to start looking at this series! Adrian
Hi-- On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Randy! > > On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the >> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. >> >> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> >> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> >> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >> --- >> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst >> v3: skipped >> v4: refresh & resend >> >> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - >> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >> scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- >> tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- >> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- >> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- >> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- >> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> >> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s >> >> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit >> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit >> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit >> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit >> >> CROSS_COMPILE > > This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't > find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please? The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline. (commit 49deed336ef9a) Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.) I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM. I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH. > Apologies that I didn't have the time earlier to start looking at this series! No problem. We'll get there. Thanks.
> On Mar 16, 2023, at 5:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > Hi-- > >> On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Hi Randy! >> >>> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the >>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. >>> >>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> >>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> >>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> >>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>> --- >>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst >>> v3: skipped >>> v4: refresh & resend >>> >>> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - >>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>> scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- >>> tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- >>> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- >>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- >>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- >>> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s >>> >>> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit >>> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit >>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit >>> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit >>> >>> CROSS_COMPILE >> >> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't >> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please? > > The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline. > (commit 49deed336ef9a) > > Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.) > I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM. > > I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH. Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree. Adrian
On 3/16/23 09:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > >> On Mar 16, 2023, at 5:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >> >> Hi-- >> >>> On 3/16/23 06:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> Hi Randy! >>> >>>> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the >>>> kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") >>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> >>>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> >>>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>>> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org >>>> Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> >>>> --- >>>> v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst >>>> v3: skipped >>>> v4: refresh & resend >>>> >>>> Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - >>>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>>> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- >>>> scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- >>>> tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- >>>> tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- >>>> 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >>>> @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s >>>> >>>> - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit >>>> - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit >>>> -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit >>>> - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit >>>> >>>> CROSS_COMPILE >>> >>> This hunk doesn't apply anymore since the parisc part has been dropped although I can't >>> find the commit for that. Could you rebase your patch, please? >> >> The parisc part has not been dropped. It's in linux-next but not yet in mainline. >> (commit 49deed336ef9a) >> >> Do you want this patch to apply to mainline? (I created it in linux-next.) >> I can do that in a few hours. I'm busy ATM. >> >> I suppose there will be a merge conflict between parisc and SH. > > Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree. Just let me know if you want me to resend it. Thanks.
Hi Randy! On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 13:43 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree. > > Just let me know if you want me to resend it. > Thanks. No, that's fine. I will rebase my for-next tree. Adrian
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 9:46 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 13:43 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree. > > > > Just let me know if you want me to resend it. > > Thanks. > > No, that's fine. I will rebase my for-next tree. Rebase on top of what? Commit 49deed336ef9a409 ("parisc: update kbuild doc. aliases for parisc64") is in the parisc tree. You must not base the SH tree on the parisc tree. Don't care about the simple conflict, Stephen and Linus can handle that fine. FTR, if the conflict was more complex, an immutable branch to be merged by all parties would be appropriate. But that's overkill and thus not needed for simple conflicts like this. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
Hi Geert! On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 08:31 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 9:46 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 13:43 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > Oops, sorry. My bad. I will use the proper tree. > > > > > > Just let me know if you want me to resend it. > > > Thanks. > > > > No, that's fine. I will rebase my for-next tree. > > Rebase on top of what? Commit 49deed336ef9a409 ("parisc: > update kbuild doc. aliases for parisc64") is in the parisc tree. > You must not base the SH tree on the parisc tree. Oh, I wasn't aware of that. > Don't care about the simple conflict, Stephen and Linus can > handle that fine. > > FTR, if the conflict was more complex, an immutable branch to be > merged by all parties would be appropriate. But that's overkill and > thus not needed for simple conflicts like this. I'll resolve the conflict manually then. Thanks. Adrian
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:00 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the > kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. > > Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> > Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> > Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> > Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> > --- > v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst > v3: skipped > v4: refresh & resend > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - > Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- > scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- > tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- > tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s > > - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit > - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit > -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit > - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit > > CROSS_COMPILE > diff -- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,5 @@ Possible arch problems I found (and eith > > ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) > > -sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) > - > sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. > - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) > diff -- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,5 @@ 我发现的可能的arch问题（并试 > > ia64 - safe_halt的调用与中断相比，是否很荒谬？ (它睡眠了吗) (参考 #4a) > > -sh64 - 睡眠与中断相比，是否很荒谬？ (参考 #4a) > - > sparc - 在这一点上，IRQ是开着的（？），把local_irq_save改为_disable。 > - 待办事项: 需要第二个CPU来禁用抢占 (参考 #1) > diff -- a/scripts/checkstack.pl b/scripts/checkstack.pl > --- a/scripts/checkstack.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkstack.pl > @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ > # Mips port by Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com> > # IA64 port via Andreas Dilger > # Arm port by Holger Schurig > -# sh64 port by Paul Mundt > # Random bits by Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> > # M68k port by Geert Uytterhoeven and Andreas Schwab > # AArch64, PARISC ports by Kyle McMartin > @@ -100,12 +99,6 @@ my (@stack, $re, $dre, $sub, $x, $xs, $f > # 100092: e3 f0 ff c8 ff 71 lay %r15,-56(%r15) > $re = qr/.*(?:lay|ag?hi).*\%r15,-(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}) > (?:\(\%r15\))?$/ox; > - } elsif ($arch =~ /^sh64$/) { > - #XXX: we only check for the immediate case presently, > - # though we will want to check for the movi/sub > - # pair for larger users. -- PFM. > - #a00048e0: d4fc40f0 addi.l r15,-240,r15 > - $re = qr/.*addi\.l.*r15,-(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}),r15/o; > } elsif ($arch eq 'sparc' || $arch eq 'sparc64') { > # f0019d10: 9d e3 bf 90 save %sp, -112, %sp > $re = qr/.*save.*%sp, -(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}), %sp/o; > diff -- a/tools/perf/arch/common.c b/tools/perf/arch/common.c > --- a/tools/perf/arch/common.c > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/common.c > @@ -51,9 +51,7 @@ const char *const s390_triplets[] = { > > const char *const sh_triplets[] = { > "sh-unknown-linux-gnu-", > - "sh64-unknown-linux-gnu-", > "sh-linux-gnu-", > - "sh64-linux-gnu-", > NULL > }; > > diff -- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch > --- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch > +++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch > @@ -29,11 +29,6 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),sparc64) > SRCARCH := sparc > endif > > -# Additional ARCH settings for sh > -ifeq ($(ARCH),sh64) > - SRCARCH := sh > -endif > - > # Additional ARCH settings for loongarch > ifeq ($(ARCH),loongarch32) > SRCARCH := loongarch > diff -- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ endif > > endif > > -ifneq (,$(filter $(MACHINE),arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 riscv64 s390x sh64 sparc64 x86_64)) > +ifneq (,$(filter $(MACHINE),arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 riscv64 s390x sparc64 x86_64)) > TEST_GEN_FILES += va_128TBswitch > TEST_GEN_FILES += virtual_address_range > TEST_GEN_FILES += write_to_hugetlbfs > diff -- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ else > fi > > # filter 64bit architectures > -ARCH64STR="arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390x sh64 sparc64 x86_64" > +ARCH64STR="arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390x sparc64 x86_64" > if [ -z "$ARCH" ]; then > ARCH=$(uname -m 2>/dev/null | sed -e 's/aarch64.*/arm64/') > fi Reviewed-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
diff -- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ But some architectures such as x86 and s - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit - parisc: parisc64 for 64 bit -- sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit CROSS_COMPILE diff -- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst @@ -70,7 +70,5 @@ Possible arch problems I found (and eith ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) -sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) - sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) diff -- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst @@ -70,7 +70,5 @@ 我发现的可能的arch问题（并试 ia64 - safe_halt的调用与中断相比，是否很荒谬？ (它睡眠了吗) (参考 #4a) -sh64 - 睡眠与中断相比，是否很荒谬？ (参考 #4a) - sparc - 在这一点上，IRQ是开着的（？），把local_irq_save改为_disable。 - 待办事项: 需要第二个CPU来禁用抢占 (参考 #1) diff -- a/scripts/checkstack.pl b/scripts/checkstack.pl --- a/scripts/checkstack.pl +++ b/scripts/checkstack.pl @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ # Mips port by Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com> # IA64 port via Andreas Dilger # Arm port by Holger Schurig -# sh64 port by Paul Mundt # Random bits by Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> # M68k port by Geert Uytterhoeven and Andreas Schwab # AArch64, PARISC ports by Kyle McMartin @@ -100,12 +99,6 @@ my (@stack, $re, $dre, $sub, $x, $xs, $f # 100092: e3 f0 ff c8 ff 71 lay %r15,-56(%r15) $re = qr/.*(?:lay|ag?hi).*\%r15,-(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}) (?:\(\%r15\))?$/ox; - } elsif ($arch =~ /^sh64$/) { - #XXX: we only check for the immediate case presently, - # though we will want to check for the movi/sub - # pair for larger users. -- PFM. - #a00048e0: d4fc40f0 addi.l r15,-240,r15 - $re = qr/.*addi\.l.*r15,-(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}),r15/o; } elsif ($arch eq 'sparc' || $arch eq 'sparc64') { # f0019d10: 9d e3 bf 90 save %sp, -112, %sp $re = qr/.*save.*%sp, -(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2}), %sp/o; diff -- a/tools/perf/arch/common.c b/tools/perf/arch/common.c --- a/tools/perf/arch/common.c +++ b/tools/perf/arch/common.c @@ -51,9 +51,7 @@ const char *const s390_triplets[] = { const char *const sh_triplets[] = { "sh-unknown-linux-gnu-", - "sh64-unknown-linux-gnu-", "sh-linux-gnu-", - "sh64-linux-gnu-", NULL }; diff -- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch --- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch +++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch @@ -29,11 +29,6 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),sparc64) SRCARCH := sparc endif -# Additional ARCH settings for sh -ifeq ($(ARCH),sh64) - SRCARCH := sh -endif - # Additional ARCH settings for loongarch ifeq ($(ARCH),loongarch32) SRCARCH := loongarch diff -- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ endif endif -ifneq (,$(filter $(MACHINE),arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 riscv64 s390x sh64 sparc64 x86_64)) +ifneq (,$(filter $(MACHINE),arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 riscv64 s390x sparc64 x86_64)) TEST_GEN_FILES += va_128TBswitch TEST_GEN_FILES += virtual_address_range TEST_GEN_FILES += write_to_hugetlbfs diff -- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ else fi # filter 64bit architectures -ARCH64STR="arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390x sh64 sparc64 x86_64" +ARCH64STR="arm64 ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390x sparc64 x86_64" if [ -z "$ARCH" ]; then ARCH=$(uname -m 2>/dev/null | sed -e 's/aarch64.*/arm64/') fi
A previous patch removed most of the sh5 (sh64) support from the kernel tree. Now remove the last stragglers. Fixes: 37744feebc08 ("sh: remove sh5 support") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> --- v2: update after adding the parisc64 alias to kbuild.rst v3: skipped v4: refresh & resend Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 1 - Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- Documentation/translations/zh_CN/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 2 -- scripts/checkstack.pl | 7 ------- tools/perf/arch/common.c | 2 -- tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 5 ----- tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- 8 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)