diff mbox series

[13/21] arc: dma-mapping: skip invalidating before bidirectional DMA

Message ID 20230327121317.4081816-14-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series dma-mapping: unify support for cache flushes | expand

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann March 27, 2023, 12:13 p.m. UTC
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Some architectures that need to invalidate buffers after bidirectional
DMA because of speculative prefetching only do a simpler writeback
before that DMA, while architectures that don't need to do the second
invalidate tend to have a combined writeback+invalidate before the
DMA.

arc is one of the architectures that does both, which seems unnecessary.

Change it to behave like arm/arm64/xtensa instead, and use just a
writeback before the DMA when we do the invalidate afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/arc/mm/dma.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Vineet Gupta April 2, 2023, 6:52 a.m. UTC | #1
CC Shahab

On 3/27/23 17:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Some architectures that need to invalidate buffers after bidirectional
> DMA because of speculative prefetching only do a simpler writeback
> before that DMA, while architectures that don't need to do the second
> invalidate tend to have a combined writeback+invalidate before the
> DMA.
>
> arc is one of the architectures that does both, which seems unnecessary.
>
> Change it to behave like arm/arm64/xtensa instead, and use just a
> writeback before the DMA when we do the invalidate afterwards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>

Reviewed-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>

Shahab can you give this a spin on hsdk - run glibc testsuite over ssh 
and make sure nothing strange happens.

Thx,
-Vineet
Shahab Vahedi April 4, 2023, 8:27 a.m. UTC | #2
On 4/2/23 08:52, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> CC Shahab
> 
> On 3/27/23 17:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Some architectures that need to invalidate buffers after bidirectional
>> DMA because of speculative prefetching only do a simpler writeback
>> before that DMA, while architectures that don't need to do the second
>> invalidate tend to have a combined writeback+invalidate before the
>> DMA.
>>
>> arc is one of the architectures that does both, which seems unnecessary.
>>
>> Change it to behave like arm/arm64/xtensa instead, and use just a
>> writeback before the DMA when we do the invalidate afterwards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>
> 
> Shahab can you give this a spin on hsdk - run glibc testsuite over ssh and make sure nothing strange happens.
> 
> Thx,
> -Vineet

On it.
Shahab Vahedi April 6, 2023, 9:01 a.m. UTC | #3
On 4/2/23 08:52, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> CC Shahab
> 
> On 3/27/23 17:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Some architectures that need to invalidate buffers after bidirectional
>> DMA because of speculative prefetching only do a simpler writeback
>> before that DMA, while architectures that don't need to do the second
>> invalidate tend to have a combined writeback+invalidate before the
>> DMA.
>>
>> arc is one of the architectures that does both, which seems unnecessary.
>>
>> Change it to behave like arm/arm64/xtensa instead, and use just a
>> writeback before the DMA when we do the invalidate afterwards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@kernel.org>
> 
> Shahab can you give this a spin on hsdk - run glibc testsuite over ssh
> and make sure nothing strange happens.
> 
> Thx,
> -Vineet

Tested-by: Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com>

No regression was observed for the ARC target before and after applying
these 21 patches. The test environment and its summary follow.

board:  ARC HSDK
base:   repo:   linux-next
        tag:    next-20230403
        commit: 31bd35b66249 Add linux-next specific files for 20230403
hotfix: net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy [1]
glibc:  2.37

Summary of test results:
     20 FAIL
   4227 PASS
     38 UNSUPPORTED
     16 XFAIL
      2 XPASS

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230405093945.3549491-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com/#r
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/dma.c b/arch/arc/mm/dma.c
index 2a7fbbb83b70..ddb96786f765 100644
--- a/arch/arc/mm/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arc/mm/dma.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@  void arch_dma_prep_coherent(struct page *page, size_t size)
  *          |----------------------------------------------------------------
  * TO_DEV   |   writeback        writeback      |   none          none
  * FROM_DEV |   invalidate       invalidate     |   invalidate*   invalidate*
- * BIDIR    |   writeback+inv    writeback+inv  |   invalidate    invalidate
+ * BIDIR    |   writeback        writeback      |   invalidate    invalidate
  *
  *     [*] needed for CPU speculative prefetches
  *
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@  void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
 		break;
 
 	case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
-		dma_cache_wback_inv(paddr, size);
+		dma_cache_wback(paddr, size);
 		break;
 
 	default: