| Message ID | E1Ye59d-0001BZ-Sv@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by > clkdev_add(). Use this instead. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew > --- > arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c > index f5b00f41c4f6..2235081a04ee 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c > @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@ > void __init orion_clkdev_add(const char *con_id, const char *dev_id, > struct clk *clk) > { > - struct clk_lookup *cl; > - > - cl = clkdev_alloc(clk, con_id, dev_id); > - if (cl) > - clkdev_add(cl); > + clkdev_create(clk, con_id, "%s", dev_id); > } > > /* Create clkdev entries for all orion platforms except kirkwood. > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andrew, Russell, On 04/04/2015 02:17, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote: >> clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by >> clkdev_add(). Use this instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > > Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> This change makes sens however what about Thomas' comment: removing orion_clkdev_add() entirely and directly using lkdev_create() all over the place: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327294.html Then what would be the path for this patch? As there is a dependency on the 6th patch of this series: "clkdev: add clkdev_create() helper" which should be merged through the clk tree, I think the best option is that this patch would be also managed by the clk tree maintainer (I added them in CC). Thanks, Gregory > > Andrew > >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c | 6 +----- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c >> index f5b00f41c4f6..2235081a04ee 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c >> @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@ >> void __init orion_clkdev_add(const char *con_id, const char *dev_id, >> struct clk *clk) >> { >> - struct clk_lookup *cl; >> - >> - cl = clkdev_alloc(clk, con_id, dev_id); >> - if (cl) >> - clkdev_add(cl); >> + clkdev_create(clk, con_id, "%s", dev_id); >> } >> >> /* Create clkdev entries for all orion platforms except kirkwood. >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Andrew, Russell, > > On 04/04/2015 02:17, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > >> clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by > >> clkdev_add(). Use this instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > > > > Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > > This change makes sens however what about Thomas' comment: removing > orion_clkdev_add() entirely and directly using lkdev_create() all over > the place: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327294.html > > Then what would be the path for this patch? > > As there is a dependency on the 6th patch of this series: "clkdev: add > clkdev_create() helper" which should be merged through the clk tree, I > think the best option is that this patch would be also managed by the > clk tree maintainer (I added them in CC). Let me remind people that clkdev is *NOT* part of clk, and that I'm the maintainer for clkdev. I'm getting rather pissed off with people taking work away from me, even when I'm named in the MAINTAINERS file. These patches are going through my tree unless there's a good reason for them not to. They are _not_ going through the clk tree.
Hi Russell, On 07/04/2015 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> Hi Andrew, Russell, >> >> On 04/04/2015 02:17, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:13:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote: >>>> clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by >>>> clkdev_add(). Use this instead. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> >>> >>> Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> >> >> This change makes sens however what about Thomas' comment: removing >> orion_clkdev_add() entirely and directly using lkdev_create() all over >> the place: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327294.html >> >> Then what would be the path for this patch? >> >> As there is a dependency on the 6th patch of this series: "clkdev: add >> clkdev_create() helper" which should be merged through the clk tree, I >> think the best option is that this patch would be also managed by the >> clk tree maintainer (I added them in CC). > > Let me remind people that clkdev is *NOT* part of clk, and that I'm the > maintainer for clkdev. Sorry for the confusion, I quickly had a look on the MAINTAINERS file and didn't realized that the drivers/clk/clkdev.c file was not part of clk (even if actually it was mentioned). > > I'm getting rather pissed off with people taking work away from me, even > when I'm named in the MAINTAINERS file. These patches are going through > my tree unless there's a good reason for them not to. They are _not_ > going through the clk tree. So, as you are going to take care of all the patches it is even simpler. You can take this one too: in mvebu there is no change on this file for this release so there won't be any conflict. Thanks, Gregory
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c index f5b00f41c4f6..2235081a04ee 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@ void __init orion_clkdev_add(const char *con_id, const char *dev_id, struct clk *clk) { - struct clk_lookup *cl; - - cl = clkdev_alloc(clk, con_id, dev_id); - if (cl) - clkdev_add(cl); + clkdev_create(clk, con_id, "%s", dev_id); } /* Create clkdev entries for all orion platforms except kirkwood.
clkdev_create() is a shorter way to write clkdev_alloc() followed by clkdev_add(). Use this instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> --- arch/arm/plat-orion/common.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)