diff mbox

[PATCHv2,4/5] FAQ: Remove outdated section about the license

Message ID 1385633782-775-5-git-send-email-franzschrober@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Franz Schrober Nov. 28, 2013, 10:16 a.m. UTC
From: Franz Schrober <franzschrober@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: Franz Schrober <franzschrober@yahoo.de>
---
 FAQ | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Josh Triplett Nov. 28, 2013, 9:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:16:21AM +0100, Franz Schrober wrote:
> From: Franz Schrober <franzschrober@yahoo.de>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Franz Schrober <franzschrober@yahoo.de>
> ---
>  FAQ | 17 -----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
> index 290de0e..56a2618 100644
> --- a/FAQ
> +++ b/FAQ
> @@ -50,23 +50,6 @@ A.  See the previous question: I personally think that the front end
>      improvements back. That's your "quid" to my "quo".

This previous section on "Why not GPL?" is now inaccurate as well; the
last paragraph no longer applies, given the MIT license.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Schrober Nov. 29, 2013, 12:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thursday 28 November 2013 13:05:38 Josh Triplett wrote:
> This previous section on "Why not GPL?" is now inaccurate as well; the
> last paragraph no longer applies, given the MIT license.

Yes, you are completely right. I've missed it because I've only searched for 
references to the OSL 1.1
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 290de0e..56a2618 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -50,23 +50,6 @@  A.  See the previous question: I personally think that the front end
     improvements back. That's your "quid" to my "quo".
 
 
-Q.  So what _is_ the license?
-
-A.  I don't know yet.  I originally thought it would be LGPL, but I'm
-    possibly going for a license that is _not_ subsumable by the GPL. 
-    In other words, I don't want to see a GPL'd project suck in the
-    LGPL'd front-end, and then make changes to the front end under the
-    GPL (this is something that the LGPL expressly allows, and see the
-    previous question for why I think it's the _only_ thing that I will
-    not allow). 
-
-    The current front-runner is the OSL ("Open Software License", see
-    http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl.php), together with a note on
-    what makes source derivative and what does not to make it clear that
-    people can write back-ends for it without having to make those
-    back-ends available under the OSL. 
-
-
 Q.  Does it really parse C?
 
 A.  Yeah, well...  It parses a fairly complete subset of "extended C" as