Message ID | 20161102215939.36765-2-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
On 02/11/16 21:59, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > GCC creates new attributes quite often, generaly for specific > usages irrelevant to what sparse is used for. > Throwing errors on these create needless noise and annoyance > which is better to avoid. > > > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> > --- > parse.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c > index 205e1264..212fae3a 100644 > --- a/parse.c > +++ b/parse.c > @@ -1230,7 +1230,8 @@ static struct token *recover_unknown_attribute(struct token *token) > { > struct expression *expr = NULL; > > - sparse_error(token->pos, "attribute '%s': unknown attribute", show_ident(token->ident)); > + if (Wunknown_attribute) Since Wunknown_attribute is not declared yet, this won't even compile. Simply squash this into patch #2. Apart from that, looks good. Thanks! ATB, Ramsay Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:29:41PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > On 02/11/16 21:59, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > GCC creates new attributes quite often, generaly for specific > > usages irrelevant to what sparse is used for. > > Throwing errors on these create needless noise and annoyance > > which is better to avoid. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> > > --- > > parse.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c > > index 205e1264..212fae3a 100644 > > --- a/parse.c > > +++ b/parse.c > > @@ -1230,7 +1230,8 @@ static struct token *recover_unknown_attribute(struct token *token) > > { > > struct expression *expr = NULL; > > > > - sparse_error(token->pos, "attribute '%s': unknown attribute", show_ident(token->ident)); > > + if (Wunknown_attribute) > > Since Wunknown_attribute is not declared yet, this won't even compile. > Simply squash this into patch #2. > > Apart from that, looks good. > > Thanks! > > ATB, > Ramsay Jones > -- Grrr yes. A leftover of the patch splitting. Sorry for that. Thanks for noticing that. Luc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c index 205e1264..212fae3a 100644 --- a/parse.c +++ b/parse.c @@ -1230,7 +1230,8 @@ static struct token *recover_unknown_attribute(struct token *token) { struct expression *expr = NULL; - sparse_error(token->pos, "attribute '%s': unknown attribute", show_ident(token->ident)); + if (Wunknown_attribute) + warning(token->pos, "attribute '%s': unknown attribute", show_ident(token->ident)); token = token->next; if (match_op(token, '(')) token = parens_expression(token, &expr, "in attribute");
GCC creates new attributes quite often, generaly for specific usages irrelevant to what sparse is used for. Throwing errors on these create needless noise and annoyance which is better to avoid. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> --- parse.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)