| Message ID | 20191109133519.63010-5-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | clarify evaluation of SYM_TYPEOF | expand |
diff --git a/show-parse.c b/show-parse.c index 371041675..80125e741 100644 --- a/show-parse.c +++ b/show-parse.c @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ deeper: mod = sym->ctype.modifiers; as = sym->ctype.as; was_ptr = 1; + examine_pointer_target(sym); break; case SYM_FN: diff --git a/validation/eval/typeof0.c b/validation/eval/typeof0.c index abef63865..12b086608 100644 --- a/validation/eval/typeof0.c +++ b/validation/eval/typeof0.c @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ static typeof(i) *ptr; /* * check-name: eval-typeof0 * check-command: test-show-type $file - * check-known-to-fail * * check-output-ignore * check-output-excludes: unknown type
Unless an explicit call to examine_pointer_target() or get_base_type() is made, the base type of pointers are *not* examined via the usual recursive examine_symbol_type(). That means that it is possible to call show_typename() on a non-fully examined type which is wrong (for example, because SYM_TYPEOFs may not be converted). So, call examine_pointer_target() on pointers when trying to display them. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> --- show-parse.c | 1 + validation/eval/typeof0.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)