Message ID | d05105da043c091d03bdc0cb45409ff774600261.1657745645.git.bristot@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | The Runtime Verification (RV) interface | expand |
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:17:27PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > Add the da_monitor_instrumentation.rst. It describes the basics > of RV monitor instrumentation. > > Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> > Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> > Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> > Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> > --- > .../trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst | 169 ++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst > > diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..7b83d6c7dbed > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ > +Deterministic Automata Instrumentation > +======================================== > + > +The RV monitor file created by dot2k, with the name "$MODEL_NAME.c" > +includes a section dedicated to instrumentation. > + > +In the example of the wip.dot monitor created on [1], it will look like:: > + > + /* > + * This is the instrumentation part of the monitor. > + * > + * This is the section where manual work is required. Here the kernel events > + * are translated into model's event. > + * > + */ > + static void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) > + { > + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); > + } > + > + static void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) > + { > + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_enable_wip); > + } > + > + static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) > + { > + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking_wip); > + } > + > + static int start_wip(void) > + { > + int retval; > + > + retval = da_monitor_init_wip(); > + if (retval) > + return retval; > + > + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); > + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); > + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); > + > + return 0; > + } > + > +The comment at the top of the section explains the general idea: the > +instrumentation section translates *kernel events* into the *model's > +event*. > + > +Tracing callback functions > +----------------------------- > + > +The first three functions are the starting point of the callback *handler > +functions* for each of the three events from the wip model. The developer > +does not necessarily need to use them: they are just starting points. > + > +Using the example of:: > + > + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) > + { > + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); > + } > + > +The preempt_disable event from the model connects directly to the > +preemptirq:preempt_disable. The preemptirq:preempt_disable event > +has the following signature, from include/trace/events/preemptirq.h:: > + > + TP_PROTO(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) > + > +Hence, the handle_preempt_disable() function will look like:: > + > + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) > + > +In this case, the kernel event translates one to one with the automata > +event, and indeed, no other change is required for this function. > + > +The next handler function, handle_preempt_enable() has the same argument > +list from the handle_preempt_disable(). The difference is that the > +preempt_enable event will be used to synchronize the system to the model. > + > +Initially, the *model* is placed in the initial state. However, the *system* > +might or might not be in the initial state. The monitor cannot start > +processing events until it knows that the system has reached the initial state. > +Otherwise, the monitor and the system could be out-of-sync. > + > +Looking at the automata definition, it is possible to see that the system > +and the model are expected to return to the initial state after the > +preempt_enable execution. Hence, it can be used to synchronize the > +system and the model at the initialization of the monitoring section. > + > +The initialization is informed via a special handle function, the > +"da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR)(event)", in this case:: > + > + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); In this case, it is da_handle_init_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip). Thanks.
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7b83d6c7dbed --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +Deterministic Automata Instrumentation +======================================== + +The RV monitor file created by dot2k, with the name "$MODEL_NAME.c" +includes a section dedicated to instrumentation. + +In the example of the wip.dot monitor created on [1], it will look like:: + + /* + * This is the instrumentation part of the monitor. + * + * This is the section where manual work is required. Here the kernel events + * are translated into model's event. + * + */ + static void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); + } + + static void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_enable_wip); + } + + static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking_wip); + } + + static int start_wip(void) + { + int retval; + + retval = da_monitor_init_wip(); + if (retval) + return retval; + + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); + + return 0; + } + +The comment at the top of the section explains the general idea: the +instrumentation section translates *kernel events* into the *model's +event*. + +Tracing callback functions +----------------------------- + +The first three functions are the starting point of the callback *handler +functions* for each of the three events from the wip model. The developer +does not necessarily need to use them: they are just starting points. + +Using the example of:: + + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, /* XXX: fill header */) + { + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); + } + +The preempt_disable event from the model connects directly to the +preemptirq:preempt_disable. The preemptirq:preempt_disable event +has the following signature, from include/trace/events/preemptirq.h:: + + TP_PROTO(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + +Hence, the handle_preempt_disable() function will look like:: + + void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + +In this case, the kernel event translates one to one with the automata +event, and indeed, no other change is required for this function. + +The next handler function, handle_preempt_enable() has the same argument +list from the handle_preempt_disable(). The difference is that the +preempt_enable event will be used to synchronize the system to the model. + +Initially, the *model* is placed in the initial state. However, the *system* +might or might not be in the initial state. The monitor cannot start +processing events until it knows that the system has reached the initial state. +Otherwise, the monitor and the system could be out-of-sync. + +Looking at the automata definition, it is possible to see that the system +and the model are expected to return to the initial state after the +preempt_enable execution. Hence, it can be used to synchronize the +system and the model at the initialization of the monitoring section. + +The initialization is informed via a special handle function, the +"da_handle_init_event_$(MONITOR)(event)", in this case:: + + da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip); + +So, the callback function will look like:: + + void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) + { + da_handle_init_event_wip(preempt_enable_wip); + } + +Finally, the "handle_sched_waking()" will look like:: + + void handle_sched_waking(void *data, struct task_struct *task) + { + da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking_wip); + } + +And the explanation is left for the reader as an exercise. + +Start and Stop functions +------------------------ + +dot2k automatically creates two special functions:: + + start_$MODELNAME() + stop_$MODELNAME() + +These functions are called when the monitor is enabled and disabled, +respectively. + +They should be used to *attach* and *detach* the instrumentation to the running +system. The developer must add to the relative function all that is needed to +*attach* and *detach* its monitor to the system. + +For the wip case, these functions were named:: + + start_wip() + stop_wip() + +But no change was required because: by default, these functions *attach* and +*detach* the tracepoints_to_attach, which was enough for this case. + +Instrumentation helpers +-------------------------- + +To complete the instrumentation, the *handler functions* need to be attached to a +kernel event, at the monitoring start phase. + +The RV interface also facilitates this step. For example, the macro "rv_attach_trace_probe()" +is used to connect the wip model events to the relative kernel event. dot2k automatically +adds "rv_attach_trace_probe()" function call for each model event in the start phase, as +a suggestion. + +For example, from the wip sample model:: + + static int start_wip(void) + { + int retval; + + retval = da_monitor_init_wip(); + if (retval) + return retval; + + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_disable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_preempt_enable); + rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", /* XXX: tracepoint */, handle_sched_waking); + + return 0; + } + +The probes then need to be detached at the stop phase. + +[1] The wip model is presented in: + Documentation/trace/rv/deterministic_automata.rst + + The wip monitor is presented in: + Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_synthesis.rst diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst index 46d47f33052c..db2ae3f90b90 100644 --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ Runtime Verification runtime-verification.rst deterministic_automata.rst da_monitor_synthesis.rst + da_monitor_instrumentation.rst
Add the da_monitor_instrumentation.rst. It describes the basics of RV monitor instrumentation. Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> --- .../trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst | 169 ++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/da_monitor_instrumentation.rst