Message ID | 20230526234435.662652-8-yuzhao@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/kvm: locklessly clear the accessed bit | expand |
On Sat May 27, 2023 at 9:44 AM AEST, Yu Zhao wrote: > Implement kvm_arch_test_clear_young() to support the fast path in > mmu_notifier_ops->test_clear_young(). > > It focuses on a simple case, i.e., radix MMU sets the accessed bit in > KVM PTEs and VMs are not nested, where it can rely on RCU and > pte_xchg() to safely clear the accessed bit without taking > kvm->mmu_lock. Complex cases fall back to the existing slow path > where kvm->mmu_lock is then taken. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++ > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 6 +++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 5 +++ > 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 14ee0dece853..75c260ea8a9e 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -883,4 +883,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {} > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > +#define kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young > +static inline bool kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young(void) > +{ > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) && > + cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE) && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300) && > + radix_enabled(); This could probably be radix_enabled() && !kvmhv_on_pseries(). Although unclear why not nested hypervisor... I'd have to think about it a bit more. Do you have any idea what might go wrong, or just didn't have the time to consider it? (Not just powerpc nested but any others). > +} > + > #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_HOST_H__ */ > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > index 79a9c0bb8bba..ff1af6a7b44f 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops { > bool (*unmap_gfn_range)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > bool (*age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > bool (*test_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > + bool (*test_clear_young)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > bool (*set_spte_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > void (*free_memslot)(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot); > int (*init_vm)(struct kvm *kvm); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > index 686d8d9eda3e..37bf40b0c4ff 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > @@ -899,6 +899,12 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_age_gfn(kvm, range); > } > > +bool kvm_arch_test_clear_young(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > +{ > + return !kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young || > + kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young(kvm, range); > +} > + > bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > { > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_spte_gfn(kvm, range); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > index 58391b4b32ed..fa2659e21ccc 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv(struct kvm *kvm, > extern bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > extern bool kvm_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > extern bool kvm_test_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > +extern bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > extern bool kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > extern int kvmppc_mmu_init_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > index 3b65b3b11041..0a392e9a100a 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > @@ -1088,6 +1088,65 @@ bool kvm_test_age_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, > return ref; > } > > +bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > +{ > + bool err; > + gfn_t gfn = range->start; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + > + err = !kvm_is_radix(kvm); > + if (err) > + goto unlock; > + > + /* > + * Case 1: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt() > + * > + * rcu_read_lock() > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 0 > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable synchronize_rcu() > + * rcu_read_unlock() > + * kvmppc_free_radix() > + * > + * > + * Case 2: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix() > + * > + * kvmppc_init_vm_radix() > + * smp_wmb() > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 1 > + * smp_rmb() > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable > + */ > + smp_rmb(); Comment could stand to expand slightly on what you are solving, in words. If you use synchronize_rcu() on both sides, you wouldn't need the barrier, right? > + while (gfn < range->end) { > + pte_t *ptep; > + pte_t old, new; > + unsigned int shift; > + > + ptep = find_kvm_secondary_pte_unlocked(kvm, gfn * PAGE_SIZE, &shift); > + if (!ptep) > + goto next; > + > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_count(virt_to_page(ptep))); Not really appropriate at the KVM level. mm enforces this kind of thing (with notifiers). > + > + old = READ_ONCE(*ptep); > + if (!pte_present(old) || !pte_young(old)) > + goto next; > + > + new = pte_mkold(old); > + > + if (kvm_should_clear_young(range, gfn)) > + pte_xchg(ptep, old, new); *Probably* will work. I can't think of a reason why not at the moment anyway :) Thanks, Nick > +next: > + gfn += shift ? BIT(shift - PAGE_SHIFT) : 1; > + } > +unlock: > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + > + return err; > +} > + > /* Returns the number of PAGE_SIZE pages that are dirty */ > static int kvm_radix_test_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, int pagenum) > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > index 130bafdb1430..20a81ec9fde8 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > @@ -5262,6 +5262,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt(struct kvm *kvm) > spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > kvm->arch.radix = 0; > spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ I'm guilty of such comments at times, but it wouldn't hurt to say /* Finish concurrent kvm_test_clear_young_hv access to page tables */ Then you know where to look for more info and you have a vague idea what it's for. > + synchronize_rcu(); > kvmppc_free_radix(kvm); > > lpcr = LPCR_VPM1; > @@ -5286,6 +5288,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix(struct kvm *kvm) > if (err) > return err; > kvmppc_rmap_reset(kvm); > + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ > + smp_wmb(); > /* Mutual exclusion with kvm_unmap_gfn_range etc. */ > spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > kvm->arch.radix = 1; > @@ -6185,6 +6189,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = { > .unmap_gfn_range = kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv, > .age_gfn = kvm_age_gfn_hv, > .test_age_gfn = kvm_test_age_gfn_hv, > + .test_clear_young = kvm_test_clear_young_hv, > .set_spte_gfn = kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv, > .free_memslot = kvmppc_core_free_memslot_hv, > .init_vm = kvmppc_core_init_vm_hv, Thanks for looking at the powerpc conversion! Thanks, Nick
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:48 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat May 27, 2023 at 9:44 AM AEST, Yu Zhao wrote: > > Implement kvm_arch_test_clear_young() to support the fast path in > > mmu_notifier_ops->test_clear_young(). > > > > It focuses on a simple case, i.e., radix MMU sets the accessed bit in > > KVM PTEs and VMs are not nested, where it can rely on RCU and > > pte_xchg() to safely clear the accessed bit without taking > > kvm->mmu_lock. Complex cases fall back to the existing slow path > > where kvm->mmu_lock is then taken. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++ > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 + > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 6 +++ > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h | 1 + > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 5 +++ > > 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > index 14ee0dece853..75c260ea8a9e 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -883,4 +883,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {} > > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > > > +#define kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young > > +static inline bool kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young(void) > > +{ > > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) && > > + cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE) && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300) && > > + radix_enabled(); > > This could probably be radix_enabled() && !kvmhv_on_pseries(). Will do. (I used !kvmhv_on_pseries() in v1 but had second thoughts on moving kvmhv_on_pseries() into this file.) > Although unclear why not nested hypervisor... I'd have to think about it a bit > more. Do you have any idea what might go wrong, or just didn't have the > time to consider it? (Not just powerpc nested but any others). Yes, this series excludes nested KVM support on all architures. The common reason for such a decision on powerpc and x86 (aarch64 doesn't support nested yet) is that it's quite challenging to make the rmap, a complex data structure that maps one PFN to multiple GFNs, lockless. (See kvmhv_insert_nest_rmap().) It might be possible, however, the potential ROI would be in question. > > +} > > + > > #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_HOST_H__ */ > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > index 79a9c0bb8bba..ff1af6a7b44f 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops { > > bool (*unmap_gfn_range)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > bool (*age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > bool (*test_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > + bool (*test_clear_young)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > bool (*set_spte_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > void (*free_memslot)(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot); > > int (*init_vm)(struct kvm *kvm); > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > index 686d8d9eda3e..37bf40b0c4ff 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > @@ -899,6 +899,12 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_age_gfn(kvm, range); > > } > > > > +bool kvm_arch_test_clear_young(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > +{ > > + return !kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young || > > + kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young(kvm, range); > > +} > > + > > bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > { > > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_spte_gfn(kvm, range); > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > index 58391b4b32ed..fa2659e21ccc 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv(struct kvm *kvm, > > extern bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > extern bool kvm_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > extern bool kvm_test_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > +extern bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > extern bool kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > > extern int kvmppc_mmu_init_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > index 3b65b3b11041..0a392e9a100a 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > @@ -1088,6 +1088,65 @@ bool kvm_test_age_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, > > return ref; > > } > > > > +bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > +{ > > + bool err; > > + gfn_t gfn = range->start; > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > + > > + err = !kvm_is_radix(kvm); > > + if (err) > > + goto unlock; > > + > > + /* > > + * Case 1: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt() > > + * > > + * rcu_read_lock() > > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 0 > > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable synchronize_rcu() > > + * rcu_read_unlock() > > + * kvmppc_free_radix() > > + * > > + * > > + * Case 2: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix() > > + * > > + * kvmppc_init_vm_radix() > > + * smp_wmb() > > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 1 > > + * smp_rmb() > > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable > > + */ > > + smp_rmb(); > > Comment could stand to expand slightly on what you are solving, in > words. Will do. > If you use synchronize_rcu() on both sides, you wouldn't need the > barrier, right? Case 2 is about memory ordering, which is orthogonal to case 1 (RCU freeing). So we need the r/w barrier regardless. > > + while (gfn < range->end) { > > + pte_t *ptep; > > + pte_t old, new; > > + unsigned int shift; > > + > > + ptep = find_kvm_secondary_pte_unlocked(kvm, gfn * PAGE_SIZE, &shift); > > + if (!ptep) > > + goto next; > > + > > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_count(virt_to_page(ptep))); > > Not really appropriate at the KVM level. mm enforces this kind of > thing (with notifiers). Will remove this. > > + > > + old = READ_ONCE(*ptep); > > + if (!pte_present(old) || !pte_young(old)) > > + goto next; > > + > > + new = pte_mkold(old); > > + > > + if (kvm_should_clear_young(range, gfn)) > > + pte_xchg(ptep, old, new); > > *Probably* will work. I can't think of a reason why not at the > moment anyway :) My reasoning: * It should work if we only change the dedicated A bit, i.e., not shared for other purposes, because races are safe (the case here). * It may not work for x86 EPT without the A bit (excluded in this series) where accesses are trapped by the R/X bits, because races in changing the R/X bits can be unsafe. > > +next: > > + gfn += shift ? BIT(shift - PAGE_SHIFT) : 1; > > + } > > +unlock: > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > /* Returns the number of PAGE_SIZE pages that are dirty */ > > static int kvm_radix_test_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, > > struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, int pagenum) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > index 130bafdb1430..20a81ec9fde8 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > > @@ -5262,6 +5262,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt(struct kvm *kvm) > > spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > > kvm->arch.radix = 0; > > spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > > + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ > > I'm guilty of such comments at times, but it wouldn't hurt to say > /* Finish concurrent kvm_test_clear_young_hv access to page tables */ > > Then you know where to look for more info and you have a vague > idea what it's for. Will do. > > + synchronize_rcu(); > > > kvmppc_free_radix(kvm); > > > > lpcr = LPCR_VPM1; > > @@ -5286,6 +5288,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix(struct kvm *kvm) > > if (err) > > return err; > > kvmppc_rmap_reset(kvm); > > + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ > > + smp_wmb(); > > /* Mutual exclusion with kvm_unmap_gfn_range etc. */ > > spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); > > kvm->arch.radix = 1; > > @@ -6185,6 +6189,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = { > > .unmap_gfn_range = kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv, > > .age_gfn = kvm_age_gfn_hv, > > .test_age_gfn = kvm_test_age_gfn_hv, > > + .test_clear_young = kvm_test_clear_young_hv, > > .set_spte_gfn = kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv, > > .free_memslot = kvmppc_core_free_memslot_hv, > > .init_vm = kvmppc_core_init_vm_hv, > > Thanks for looking at the powerpc conversion! Thanks for reviewing!
On Wed Jun 21, 2023 at 10:38 AM AEST, Yu Zhao wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:48 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat May 27, 2023 at 9:44 AM AEST, Yu Zhao wrote: > > > Implement kvm_arch_test_clear_young() to support the fast path in > > > mmu_notifier_ops->test_clear_young(). > > > > > > It focuses on a simple case, i.e., radix MMU sets the accessed bit in > > > KVM PTEs and VMs are not nested, where it can rely on RCU and > > > pte_xchg() to safely clear the accessed bit without taking > > > kvm->mmu_lock. Complex cases fall back to the existing slow path > > > where kvm->mmu_lock is then taken. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> > > > --- > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++ > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 + > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 6 +++ > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h | 1 + > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 5 +++ > > > 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > index 14ee0dece853..75c260ea8a9e 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > @@ -883,4 +883,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {} > > > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > > static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > > > > > > +#define kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young > > > +static inline bool kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young(void) > > > +{ > > > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) && > > > + cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE) && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300) && > > > + radix_enabled(); > > > > This could probably be radix_enabled() && !kvmhv_on_pseries(). > > Will do. (I used !kvmhv_on_pseries() in v1 but had second thoughts on > moving kvmhv_on_pseries() into this file.) That should be okay. kvmhv_on_pseries is a property of the host so it seems reasonable to move it here if needed. > > Although unclear why not nested hypervisor... I'd have to think about it a bit > > more. Do you have any idea what might go wrong, or just didn't have the > > time to consider it? (Not just powerpc nested but any others). > > Yes, this series excludes nested KVM support on all architures. The > common reason for such a decision on powerpc and x86 (aarch64 doesn't > support nested yet) is that it's quite challenging to make the rmap, a > complex data structure that maps one PFN to multiple GFNs, lockless. > (See kvmhv_insert_nest_rmap().) It might be possible, however, the > potential ROI would be in question. Okay just wondering. rmap (at least the powerpc one) is just a list I think, with a few details. If that is all it is, it might not be so hard to make that lock-free or a fine-grained lock on the rmap chains maybe. But fine to ignore it to start with. > > > +} > > > + > > > #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_HOST_H__ */ > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > > index 79a9c0bb8bba..ff1af6a7b44f 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h > > > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops { > > > bool (*unmap_gfn_range)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > bool (*age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > bool (*test_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > + bool (*test_clear_young)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > bool (*set_spte_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > void (*free_memslot)(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot); > > > int (*init_vm)(struct kvm *kvm); > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > > index 686d8d9eda3e..37bf40b0c4ff 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c > > > @@ -899,6 +899,12 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_age_gfn(kvm, range); > > > } > > > > > > +bool kvm_arch_test_clear_young(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > > +{ > > > + return !kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young || > > > + kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young(kvm, range); > > > +} > > > + > > > bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > > { > > > return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_spte_gfn(kvm, range); > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > > index 58391b4b32ed..fa2659e21ccc 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h > > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv(struct kvm *kvm, > > > extern bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > extern bool kvm_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > extern bool kvm_test_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > +extern bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > extern bool kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > > > > > > extern int kvmppc_mmu_init_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > > index 3b65b3b11041..0a392e9a100a 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c > > > @@ -1088,6 +1088,65 @@ bool kvm_test_age_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, > > > return ref; > > > } > > > > > > +bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) > > > +{ > > > + bool err; > > > + gfn_t gfn = range->start; > > > + > > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > > + > > > + err = !kvm_is_radix(kvm); > > > + if (err) > > > + goto unlock; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Case 1: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt() > > > + * > > > + * rcu_read_lock() > > > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 0 > > > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable synchronize_rcu() > > > + * rcu_read_unlock() > > > + * kvmppc_free_radix() > > > + * > > > + * > > > + * Case 2: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix() > > > + * > > > + * kvmppc_init_vm_radix() > > > + * smp_wmb() > > > + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 1 > > > + * smp_rmb() > > > + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable > > > + */ > > > + smp_rmb(); > > > > Comment could stand to expand slightly on what you are solving, in > > words. > > Will do. > > > If you use synchronize_rcu() on both sides, you wouldn't need the > > barrier, right? > > Case 2 is about memory ordering, which is orthogonal to case 1 (RCU > freeing). So we need the r/w barrier regardless. RCU can take care of memory ordering too though. If you had synchronize_rcu() where smp_wmb() is, then no smp_rmb() neeed here. > > > > + while (gfn < range->end) { > > > + pte_t *ptep; > > > + pte_t old, new; > > > + unsigned int shift; > > > + > > > + ptep = find_kvm_secondary_pte_unlocked(kvm, gfn * PAGE_SIZE, &shift); > > > + if (!ptep) > > > + goto next; > > > + > > > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_count(virt_to_page(ptep))); > > > > Not really appropriate at the KVM level. mm enforces this kind of > > thing (with notifiers). > > Will remove this. > > > > + > > > + old = READ_ONCE(*ptep); > > > + if (!pte_present(old) || !pte_young(old)) > > > + goto next; > > > + > > > + new = pte_mkold(old); > > > + > > > + if (kvm_should_clear_young(range, gfn)) > > > + pte_xchg(ptep, old, new); > > > > *Probably* will work. I can't think of a reason why not at the > > moment anyway :) > > My reasoning: > * It should work if we only change the dedicated A bit, i.e., not > shared for other purposes, because races are safe (the case here). > * It may not work for x86 EPT without the A bit (excluded in this > series) where accesses are trapped by the R/X bits, because races in > changing the R/X bits can be unsafe. (For the benefit of others reading, it works because powerpc's pte_xchg is actually a cmpxchg, for some reason which we really should fix). Although it can fail to clear the bit if the cmpxchg fails. I think pte_xchg is only used on with hash MMU in Linux before this change. I think we may want to keep it that way and use something like kvmppc_radix_update_pte() here to clear out the bit. But don't worry too much about fine details so much before sorting out the core changes I will have a better look after that. Thanks, Nick
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 14ee0dece853..75c260ea8a9e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -883,4 +883,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {} static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} +#define kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young +static inline bool kvm_arch_has_test_clear_young(void) +{ + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE) && + cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE) && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300) && + radix_enabled(); +} + #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_HOST_H__ */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h index 79a9c0bb8bba..ff1af6a7b44f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops { bool (*unmap_gfn_range)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); bool (*age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); bool (*test_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); + bool (*test_clear_young)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); bool (*set_spte_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); void (*free_memslot)(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot); int (*init_vm)(struct kvm *kvm); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c index 686d8d9eda3e..37bf40b0c4ff 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c @@ -899,6 +899,12 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_age_gfn(kvm, range); } +bool kvm_arch_test_clear_young(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) +{ + return !kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young || + kvm->arch.kvm_ops->test_clear_young(kvm, range); +} + bool kvm_set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) { return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->set_spte_gfn(kvm, range); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h index 58391b4b32ed..fa2659e21ccc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv(struct kvm *kvm, extern bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); extern bool kvm_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); extern bool kvm_test_age_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); +extern bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); extern bool kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range); extern int kvmppc_mmu_init_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c index 3b65b3b11041..0a392e9a100a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c @@ -1088,6 +1088,65 @@ bool kvm_test_age_radix(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, return ref; } +bool kvm_test_clear_young_hv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) +{ + bool err; + gfn_t gfn = range->start; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + err = !kvm_is_radix(kvm); + if (err) + goto unlock; + + /* + * Case 1: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt() + * + * rcu_read_lock() + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 0 + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable synchronize_rcu() + * rcu_read_unlock() + * kvmppc_free_radix() + * + * + * Case 2: This function kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix() + * + * kvmppc_init_vm_radix() + * smp_wmb() + * Test kvm_is_radix() kvm->arch.radix = 1 + * smp_rmb() + * Use kvm->arch.pgtable + */ + smp_rmb(); + + while (gfn < range->end) { + pte_t *ptep; + pte_t old, new; + unsigned int shift; + + ptep = find_kvm_secondary_pte_unlocked(kvm, gfn * PAGE_SIZE, &shift); + if (!ptep) + goto next; + + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_count(virt_to_page(ptep))); + + old = READ_ONCE(*ptep); + if (!pte_present(old) || !pte_young(old)) + goto next; + + new = pte_mkold(old); + + if (kvm_should_clear_young(range, gfn)) + pte_xchg(ptep, old, new); +next: + gfn += shift ? BIT(shift - PAGE_SHIFT) : 1; + } +unlock: + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return err; +} + /* Returns the number of PAGE_SIZE pages that are dirty */ static int kvm_radix_test_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, int pagenum) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c index 130bafdb1430..20a81ec9fde8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c @@ -5262,6 +5262,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_hpt(struct kvm *kvm) spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); kvm->arch.radix = 0; spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock); + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ + synchronize_rcu(); kvmppc_free_radix(kvm); lpcr = LPCR_VPM1; @@ -5286,6 +5288,8 @@ int kvmppc_switch_mmu_to_radix(struct kvm *kvm) if (err) return err; kvmppc_rmap_reset(kvm); + /* see the comments in kvm_test_clear_young_hv() */ + smp_wmb(); /* Mutual exclusion with kvm_unmap_gfn_range etc. */ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); kvm->arch.radix = 1; @@ -6185,6 +6189,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = { .unmap_gfn_range = kvm_unmap_gfn_range_hv, .age_gfn = kvm_age_gfn_hv, .test_age_gfn = kvm_test_age_gfn_hv, + .test_clear_young = kvm_test_clear_young_hv, .set_spte_gfn = kvm_set_spte_gfn_hv, .free_memslot = kvmppc_core_free_memslot_hv, .init_vm = kvmppc_core_init_vm_hv,
Implement kvm_arch_test_clear_young() to support the fast path in mmu_notifier_ops->test_clear_young(). It focuses on a simple case, i.e., radix MMU sets the accessed bit in KVM PTEs and VMs are not nested, where it can rely on RCU and pte_xchg() to safely clear the accessed bit without taking kvm->mmu_lock. Complex cases fall back to the existing slow path where kvm->mmu_lock is then taken. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 6 +++ arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_radix.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 5 +++ 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+)