From patchwork Tue May 21 10:48:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiri Olsa X-Patchwork-Id: 13669269 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDD96F086; Tue, 21 May 2024 10:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716288588; cv=none; b=tC5jXK9Rn/8ExtZd6GsGPl7+ueBiKF+cAhTsS3Zqjnr2mZOwgnhRVIcwkF6JDxT9LpKHSRbcj5g3fW+H4vGOS1s35IhxxifSJDri9urPoZl9d5m0YhWT8myhCw0mFcRZodD5bThmp979ZoKiRV2BPKVsbXXfRu24qL1VPfJHTbc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716288588; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6Rn1oqgl6PL1+fcYKfZc7ZqYMMU121MwU600zJGLrpc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Tic0LW0BHmshTZ1ZweExKP6YsiaTquZ5hM/gPL8hyhbK46GCbwDLW3n+hV2tRFjZc9ECtlHxDu1evyeM4JMwy3zzqv6pl+U1XbFNjJHdqbxHSJL0bzTrf7dqjRkh0n1465b04X3OJkzcyo2tU1i/EUx84SCrx60Yjre425D4l0g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=M+cdfzvQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M+cdfzvQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C528C2BD11; Tue, 21 May 2024 10:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1716288587; bh=6Rn1oqgl6PL1+fcYKfZc7ZqYMMU121MwU600zJGLrpc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M+cdfzvQzGx0MK7r7WxZJ8pDTUAn+TMJFeNjRj7CFs/Q6kHgFpwoa45ncRPy4q88i Ct4C1qdtf0SmO4nR2D/tqNsgbWrdmqw/8Z/3xfPgSNVf2SevvW9QJYNK8fYTT8nPgP qLFmo5M3/3MVjJWjtH0N4QBFwa0PU44FOPJ3pC1Q6EBhJgPqiioVRvd/JpN7OJk2nf 50npAtk6JENm/JUigcQLPtq8mFiRBWJOZ26CFr6LDqA4V5biVxa+EJfaxJEiNqELXC Qj86TImkDhz7DAYq43ZgpF2habhwTSvv7lLcveVYycvgilokFFz/cFiMdWjYRUSz46 yXoyBF3LJFGYw== From: Jiri Olsa To: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Oleg Nesterov , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "Edgecombe, Rick P" , Deepak Gupta Subject: [PATCHv6 bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20240521104825.1060966-7-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: <20240521104825.1060966-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20240521104825.1060966-1-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Adding test that creates uprobe consumer on uretprobe which changes some of the registers. Making sure the changed registers are propagated to the user space when the ureptobe syscall trampoline is used on x86_64. To be able to do this, adding support to bpf_testmod to create uprobe via new attribute file: /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod_uprobe This file is expecting file offset and creates related uprobe on current process exe file and removes existing uprobe if offset is 0. The can be only single uprobe at any time. The uprobe has specific consumer that changes registers used in ureprobe syscall trampoline and which are later checked in the test. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 67 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 2a18bd320e92..b0132a342bb5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "bpf_testmod.h" #include "bpf_testmod_kfunc.h" @@ -358,6 +359,119 @@ static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = { .write = bpf_testmod_test_write, }; +/* bpf_testmod_uprobe sysfs attribute is so far enabled for x86_64 only, + * please see test_uretprobe_regs_change test + */ +#ifdef __x86_64__ + +static int +uprobe_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *self, unsigned long func, + struct pt_regs *regs) + +{ + regs->ax = 0x12345678deadbeef; + regs->cx = 0x87654321feebdaed; + regs->r11 = (u64) -1; + return true; +} + +struct testmod_uprobe { + struct path path; + loff_t offset; + struct uprobe_consumer consumer; +}; + +static DEFINE_MUTEX(testmod_uprobe_mutex); + +static struct testmod_uprobe uprobe = { + .consumer.ret_handler = uprobe_ret_handler, +}; + +static int testmod_register_uprobe(loff_t offset) +{ + int err = -EBUSY; + + if (uprobe.offset) + return -EBUSY; + + mutex_lock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex); + + if (uprobe.offset) + goto out; + + err = kern_path("/proc/self/exe", LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &uprobe.path); + if (err) + goto out; + + err = uprobe_register_refctr(d_real_inode(uprobe.path.dentry), + offset, 0, &uprobe.consumer); + if (err) + path_put(&uprobe.path); + else + uprobe.offset = offset; + +out: + mutex_unlock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex); + return err; +} + +static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void) +{ + mutex_lock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex); + + if (uprobe.offset) { + uprobe_unregister(d_real_inode(uprobe.path.dentry), + uprobe.offset, &uprobe.consumer); + uprobe.offset = 0; + } + + mutex_unlock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex); +} + +static ssize_t +bpf_testmod_uprobe_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, + struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len) +{ + unsigned long offset = 0; + int err = 0; + + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &offset)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (offset) + err = testmod_register_uprobe(offset); + else + testmod_unregister_uprobe(); + + return err ?: strlen(buf); +} + +static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_uprobe_file __ro_after_init = { + .attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod_uprobe", .mode = 0666, }, + .write = bpf_testmod_uprobe_write, +}; + +static int register_bpf_testmod_uprobe(void) +{ + return sysfs_create_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_uprobe_file); +} + +static void unregister_bpf_testmod_uprobe(void) +{ + testmod_unregister_uprobe(); + sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_uprobe_file); +} + +#else +static int register_bpf_testmod_uprobe(void) +{ + return 0; +} + +static void unregister_bpf_testmod_uprobe(void) { } +#endif + BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) @@ -912,7 +1026,13 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void) return -EINVAL; sock = NULL; mutex_init(&sock_lock); - return sysfs_create_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file); + ret = sysfs_create_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + ret = register_bpf_testmod_uprobe(); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + return 0; } static void bpf_testmod_exit(void) @@ -927,6 +1047,7 @@ static void bpf_testmod_exit(void) bpf_kfunc_close_sock(); sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file); + unregister_bpf_testmod_uprobe(); } module_init(bpf_testmod_init); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c index 311ac19d8992..1a50cd35205d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c @@ -149,15 +149,82 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_equal(void) cleanup: uprobe_syscall__destroy(skel); } + +#define BPF_TESTMOD_UPROBE_TEST_FILE "/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod_uprobe" + +static int write_bpf_testmod_uprobe(unsigned long offset) +{ + size_t n, ret; + char buf[30]; + int fd; + + n = sprintf(buf, "%lu", offset); + + fd = open(BPF_TESTMOD_UPROBE_TEST_FILE, O_WRONLY); + if (fd < 0) + return -errno; + + ret = write(fd, buf, n); + close(fd); + return ret != n ? (int) ret : 0; +} + +static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void) +{ + struct pt_regs before = {}, after = {}; + unsigned long *pb = (unsigned long *) &before; + unsigned long *pa = (unsigned long *) &after; + unsigned long cnt = sizeof(before)/sizeof(*pb); + unsigned int i, err, offset; + + offset = get_uprobe_offset(uretprobe_regs_trigger); + + err = write_bpf_testmod_uprobe(offset); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "register_uprobe")) + return; + + uretprobe_regs(&before, &after); + + err = write_bpf_testmod_uprobe(0); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "unregister_uprobe")) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { + unsigned int offset = i * sizeof(unsigned long); + + switch (offset) { + case offsetof(struct pt_regs, rax): + ASSERT_EQ(pa[i], 0x12345678deadbeef, "rax"); + break; + case offsetof(struct pt_regs, rcx): + ASSERT_EQ(pa[i], 0x87654321feebdaed, "rcx"); + break; + case offsetof(struct pt_regs, r11): + ASSERT_EQ(pa[i], (__u64) -1, "r11"); + break; + default: + if (!ASSERT_EQ(pa[i], pb[i], "register before-after value check")) + fprintf(stdout, "failed register offset %u\n", offset); + } + } +} + #else static void test_uretprobe_regs_equal(void) { test__skip(); } + +static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void) +{ + test__skip(); +} #endif void test_uprobe_syscall(void) { if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_regs_equal")) test_uretprobe_regs_equal(); + if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_regs_change")) + test_uretprobe_regs_change(); }