From patchwork Tue Aug 9 09:42:58 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bastien Nocera X-Patchwork-Id: 12939498 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42D9C25B06 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237633AbiHIJnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 05:43:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37026 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236324AbiHIJnG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 05:43:06 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4138C222BD; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 02:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (Authenticated sender: hadess@hadess.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEAB6FF808; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:43:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Bastien Nocera To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Benjamin Tissoires , Peter Hutterer , "Eric W . Biederman" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Bastien Nocera Subject: [PATCH 0/2] USB: core: add a way to revoke access to open USB devices Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:42:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20220809094300.83116-1-hadess@hadess.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org BPF list, first CC: here, I hope the commit messages are clear enough to understand the purpose of the patchset. If not, your comments would be greatly appreciated so I can make the commit messages self-explanatory. Eric, what would be the right identifier to use for a specific user namespace that userspace could find out? I know the PIDs of the bubblewrap processes that created those user namespaces, would those be good enough? Changes since v2: - Changed the internal API to pass a struct usb_device - Fixed potential busy loop in user-space when revoking access to a device Bastien Nocera (2): USB: core: add a way to revoke access to open USB devices usb: Implement usb_revoke() BPF function drivers/usb/core/devio.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/core/usb.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)