@@ -327,11 +327,13 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
tail++;
pipe_commit_read(pipe, tail);
- do_wakeup = 0;
- prelocked_wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(
- &pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+ do_wakeup = 1;
+ if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+ prelocked_wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(
+ &pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
- kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+ if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+ kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
}
total_len -= chars;
if (!total_len)
@@ -360,11 +362,6 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
}
- if (do_wakeup) {
- wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
- kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
- do_wakeup = 0;
- }
pipe_wait(pipe);
}
__pipe_unlock(pipe);
Only do a wakeup in pipe_read() if we made space in a completely full buffer. The producer shouldn't be waiting on pipe->wait otherwise. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> --- fs/pipe.c | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)