@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ xhci_dbc_tty_exit_port(struct dbc_port *port)
tty_port_destroy(&port->port);
}
-int xhci_dbc_tty_register_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
+static int xhci_dbc_tty_register_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
int ret;
struct device *tty_dev;
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ int xhci_dbc_tty_register_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
return ret;
}
-void xhci_dbc_tty_unregister_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
+static void xhci_dbc_tty_unregister_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
The sparse tool complains as follows: drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c:401:5: warning: symbol 'xhci_dbc_tty_register_device' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c:452:6: warning: symbol 'xhci_dbc_tty_unregister_device' was not declared. Should it be static? After commit 6ae6470bfa33 ("xhci: dbc: Add a operations structure to access driver functions"), those functions are not used outside of xhci-dbgtty.c, so this commit marks them static. Fixes: 6ae6470bfa33 ("xhci: dbc: Add a operations structure to access driver functions") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> --- drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)