Message ID | 20240216005756.762712-3-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Add multiport support for DWC3 controllers | expand |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:27:49AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote: > Currently Multiport DWC3 controllers are host-only capable. I already asked you to rephrase this so that it becomes clear that you are describing a property of the current hardware (and similar throughout the series): https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTI7AtCJWgAnACSh@hovoldconsulting.com/ > +static int dwc3_read_port_info(struct dwc3 *dwc) > +{ > + void __iomem *base; > + u8 major_revision; > + u32 offset; > + u32 val; > + > + /* > + * Remap xHCI address space to access XHCI ext cap regs since it is > + * needed to get information on number of ports present. > + */ > + base = ioremap(dwc->xhci_resources[0].start, > + resource_size(&dwc->xhci_resources[0])); > + if (IS_ERR(base)) > + return PTR_ERR(base); > + > + offset = 0; > + do { > + offset = xhci_find_next_ext_cap(base, offset, > + XHCI_EXT_CAPS_PROTOCOL); > + if (!offset) > + break; > + > + val = readl(base + offset); > + major_revision = XHCI_EXT_PORT_MAJOR(val); > + > + val = readl(base + offset + 0x08); > + if (major_revision == 0x03) { > + dwc->num_usb3_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); > + } else if (major_revision <= 0x02) { > + dwc->num_usb2_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); > + } else { > + dev_warn(dwc->dev, > + "unrecognized port major revision %d\n", I still think you should merge this with the previous line even if you end up with 83 chars. > + major_revision); > + } > + } while (1); > + /* > + * Currently only DWC3 controllers that are host-only capable > + * support Multiport. > + */ So again, also here, rephrase the comment so that it is clear that you are referring to a property of the current hardware. > + hw_mode = DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE(dwc->hwparams.hwparams0); > + if (hw_mode == DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE_HOST) { > + ret = dwc3_read_port_info(dwc); > + if (ret) > + goto err_disable_clks; > + } else { > + dwc->num_usb2_ports = 1; > + dwc->num_usb3_ports = 1; > + } Johan
On 2/29/2024 3:17 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:27:49AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote: >> Currently Multiport DWC3 controllers are host-only capable. > > I already asked you to rephrase this so that it becomes clear that you > are describing a property of the current hardware (and similar > throughout the series): > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTI7AtCJWgAnACSh@hovoldconsulting.com/ Hi Johan. Thanks for the review. IMO, the statement is describing a property unique to current hardware, that "If it is a multiport controller, it is then host-only capable" I used the word "Currently" to indicate that "Today, the multiport devices present...". Let me know if there is any ambiguity in the sentence. In v13, I wrote: "Currently host-only capable DWC3 controllers support Multiport." You were right. It was ambiguous as it might refer to even single port controllers. So I changed it saying all the DWC3 multiport controllers are host only capable. How about: "All the DWC3 Multi Port controllers that exist today only support host mode" > >> +static int dwc3_read_port_info(struct dwc3 *dwc) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *base; >> + u8 major_revision; >> + u32 offset; >> + u32 val; >> + >> + /* >> + * Remap xHCI address space to access XHCI ext cap regs since it is >> + * needed to get information on number of ports present. >> + */ >> + base = ioremap(dwc->xhci_resources[0].start, >> + resource_size(&dwc->xhci_resources[0])); >> + if (IS_ERR(base)) >> + return PTR_ERR(base); >> + >> + offset = 0; >> + do { >> + offset = xhci_find_next_ext_cap(base, offset, >> + XHCI_EXT_CAPS_PROTOCOL); >> + if (!offset) >> + break; >> + >> + val = readl(base + offset); >> + major_revision = XHCI_EXT_PORT_MAJOR(val); >> + >> + val = readl(base + offset + 0x08); >> + if (major_revision == 0x03) { >> + dwc->num_usb3_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); >> + } else if (major_revision <= 0x02) { >> + dwc->num_usb2_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); >> + } else { >> + dev_warn(dwc->dev, >> + "unrecognized port major revision %d\n", > > I still think you should merge this with the previous line even if you > end up with 83 chars. > >> + major_revision); >> + } >> + } while (1); > >> + /* >> + * Currently only DWC3 controllers that are host-only capable >> + * support Multiport. >> + */ > > So again, also here, rephrase the comment so that it is clear that you > are referring to a property of the current hardware. I put the comment this way to indicate that we don't want to check for existence of multiple ports if the controller is not "host-only" capable. We should only check for multport support only if we are host-only capable. I think the statement clearly tells that "check for host-only" configuration before proceeding to check for xhci register reads. I replied the same on: https://lore.kernel.org/all/279a54f2-7260-4270-83c7-d6f5c5ba0873@quicinc.com/ And since you didn't mention anything else at this part of code in your return reply in: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTYyXhyZN3jBXEfm@hovoldconsulting.com/ I thought this statement was fine to go. > >> + hw_mode = DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE(dwc->hwparams.hwparams0); >> + if (hw_mode == DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE_HOST) { >> + ret = dwc3_read_port_info(dwc); >> + if (ret) >> + goto err_disable_clks; >> + } else { >> + dwc->num_usb2_ports = 1; >> + dwc->num_usb3_ports = 1; >> + } > Thanks for the review. Can you help let me know your review on the other patches as well. Regards, Krishna,
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 05:23:08PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote: > On 2/29/2024 3:17 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:27:49AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote: > >> Currently Multiport DWC3 controllers are host-only capable. > > > > I already asked you to rephrase this so that it becomes clear that you > > are describing a property of the current hardware (and similar > > throughout the series): > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTI7AtCJWgAnACSh@hovoldconsulting.com/ > IMO, the statement is describing a property unique to current hardware, > that "If it is a multiport controller, it is then host-only capable" > > I used the word "Currently" to indicate that "Today, the multiport > devices present...". Let me know if there is any ambiguity in the sentence. > > In v13, I wrote: > "Currently host-only capable DWC3 controllers support Multiport." > You were right. It was ambiguous as it might refer to even single port > controllers. > > So I changed it saying all the DWC3 multiport controllers are host only > capable. > > How about: > > "All the DWC3 Multi Port controllers that exist today only support host > mode" That should be clear enough, thanks. > >> + /* > >> + * Currently only DWC3 controllers that are host-only capable > >> + * support Multiport. > >> + */ > > > > So again, also here, rephrase the comment so that it is clear that you > > are referring to a property of the current hardware. > > I put the comment this way to indicate that we don't want to check for > existence of multiple ports if the controller is not "host-only" > capable. We should only check for multport support only if we are > host-only capable. I think the statement clearly tells that "check for > host-only" configuration before proceeding to check for xhci register reads. Fair enough, this comment could be considered to apply only to the implementation. Perhaps the following would be more clear though: Currently only DWC3 controllers that are host-only capable can have more than one port. or simply Host-only capable controllers can have more than one port. Both of these also gives a hint that this is a property of the hardware. > I replied the same on: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/279a54f2-7260-4270-83c7-d6f5c5ba0873@quicinc.com/ > > And since you didn't mention anything else at this part of code in your > return reply in: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZTYyXhyZN3jBXEfm@hovoldconsulting.com/ I left in the following quote on purpose in that reply: > > Please rephrase accordingly throughout so that this becomes clear. Johan
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c index 3b68e8e45b8b..965eaad195fb 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include "io.h" #include "debug.h" +#include "../host/xhci-ext-caps.h" #define DWC3_DEFAULT_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 5000 /* ms */ @@ -1882,10 +1883,57 @@ static int dwc3_get_clocks(struct dwc3 *dwc) return 0; } +static int dwc3_read_port_info(struct dwc3 *dwc) +{ + void __iomem *base; + u8 major_revision; + u32 offset; + u32 val; + + /* + * Remap xHCI address space to access XHCI ext cap regs since it is + * needed to get information on number of ports present. + */ + base = ioremap(dwc->xhci_resources[0].start, + resource_size(&dwc->xhci_resources[0])); + if (IS_ERR(base)) + return PTR_ERR(base); + + offset = 0; + do { + offset = xhci_find_next_ext_cap(base, offset, + XHCI_EXT_CAPS_PROTOCOL); + if (!offset) + break; + + val = readl(base + offset); + major_revision = XHCI_EXT_PORT_MAJOR(val); + + val = readl(base + offset + 0x08); + if (major_revision == 0x03) { + dwc->num_usb3_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); + } else if (major_revision <= 0x02) { + dwc->num_usb2_ports += XHCI_EXT_PORT_COUNT(val); + } else { + dev_warn(dwc->dev, + "unrecognized port major revision %d\n", + major_revision); + } + } while (1); + + dev_dbg(dwc->dev, "hs-ports: %u ss-ports: %u\n", + dwc->num_usb2_ports, dwc->num_usb3_ports); + + iounmap(base); + + return 0; +} + static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct resource *res, dwc_res; + unsigned int hw_mode; void __iomem *regs; struct dwc3 *dwc; int ret; @@ -1969,6 +2017,20 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_disable_clks; } + /* + * Currently only DWC3 controllers that are host-only capable + * support Multiport. + */ + hw_mode = DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE(dwc->hwparams.hwparams0); + if (hw_mode == DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE_HOST) { + ret = dwc3_read_port_info(dwc); + if (ret) + goto err_disable_clks; + } else { + dwc->num_usb2_ports = 1; + dwc->num_usb3_ports = 1; + } + spin_lock_init(&dwc->lock); mutex_init(&dwc->mutex); diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h index df544ec730d2..4c52fef99838 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h @@ -1039,6 +1039,8 @@ struct dwc3_scratchpad_array { * @usb3_phy: pointer to USB3 PHY * @usb2_generic_phy: pointer to USB2 PHY * @usb3_generic_phy: pointer to USB3 PHY + * @num_usb2_ports: number of USB2 ports + * @num_usb3_ports: number of USB3 ports * @phys_ready: flag to indicate that PHYs are ready * @ulpi: pointer to ulpi interface * @ulpi_ready: flag to indicate that ULPI is initialized @@ -1187,6 +1189,9 @@ struct dwc3 { struct phy *usb2_generic_phy; struct phy *usb3_generic_phy; + u8 num_usb2_ports; + u8 num_usb3_ports; + bool phys_ready; struct ulpi *ulpi;