Message ID | cover.1574591746.git.hns@goldelico.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti,power-gpio | expand |
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> writes: > The driver has been updated to use the mmc/sdio core > which does full power control. So we do no longer need > the power control gipo. > > Note that it is still needed for the SPI based interface > (N900). > > Suggested by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Tested by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # OpenPandora 600MHz > > H. Nikolaus Schaller (2): > DTS: bindings: wl1251: mark ti,power-gpio as optional > net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti,power-gpio > > .../bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt | 3 +- > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c | 30 ------------------- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) Via which tree are these planned to go? Please always document that in the cover letter so that maintainers don't need to guess.
> Am 26.11.2019 um 16:51 schrieb Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>: > > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> writes: > >> The driver has been updated to use the mmc/sdio core >> which does full power control. So we do no longer need >> the power control gipo. >> >> Note that it is still needed for the SPI based interface >> (N900). >> >> Suggested by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> >> Tested by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # OpenPandora 600MHz >> >> H. Nikolaus Schaller (2): >> DTS: bindings: wl1251: mark ti,power-gpio as optional >> net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti,power-gpio >> >> .../bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt | 3 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c | 30 ------------------- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > Via which tree are these planned to go? Please always document that in > the cover letter so that maintainers don't need to guess. Well, how should I know that better than maintainers? I don't know who manages which trees and who feels responsible. So I have to guess even more. I just use the get_maintainer.pl script to address everybody listed by it, assuming that it does the right thing. If the script doesn't do a good enough job it should be improved. BR and thanks, Nikolaus
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:51:28 +0000 Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> writes: > > > The driver has been updated to use the mmc/sdio core > > which does full power control. So we do no longer need > > the power control gipo. > > > > Note that it is still needed for the SPI based interface > > (N900). > > > > Suggested by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > Tested by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # OpenPandora 600MHz > > > > H. Nikolaus Schaller (2): > > DTS: bindings: wl1251: mark ti,power-gpio as optional > > net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti,power-gpio > > > > .../bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt | 3 +- > > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c | 30 ------------------- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > Via which tree are these planned to go? Please always document that in > the cover letter so that maintainers don't need to guess. > Hmm, this is about bisect issues and the former misc pandora fix/cleanup series now in linux-next that make you doubt it should go via wireless/net? So the question is whether it depends on that? Regards, Andreas