From patchwork Wed Apr 17 21:34:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fenghua Yu X-Patchwork-Id: 10906185 X-Patchwork-Delegate: johannes@sipsolutions.net Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A7517E6 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3965728BA9 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2DA8C28BAD; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F6128BA9 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387818AbfDQVnz (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:43:55 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:20166 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387565AbfDQVm0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:42:26 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2019 14:42:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,363,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="224441193" Received: from romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com ([172.25.110.60]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2019 14:42:24 -0700 From: Fenghua Yu To: "Thomas Gleixner" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Borislav Petkov" , "H Peter Anvin" , "Paolo Bonzini" , "Dave Hansen" , "Ashok Raj" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Ravi V Shankar" , "Xiaoyao Li " , "Christopherson Sean J" , "Kalle Valo" , "Michael Chan" Cc: "linux-kernel" , "x86" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li , Fenghua Yu Subject: [PATCH v7 13/21] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST_CTL Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:34:03 -0700 Message-Id: <1555536851-17462-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: <1555536851-17462-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> References: <1555536851-17462-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Xiaoyao Li A control bit (bit 29) in TEST_CTL MSR 0x33 will be introduced in future x86 processors. When bit 29 is set, the processor causes #AC exception for split locked accesses at all CPL. Please check the latest Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual for more detailed information on the MSR and the split lock bit. This patch emulates MSR TEST_CTL with vmx->msr_test_ctl and does the following: 1. As MSR TEST_CTL of guest is emulated, enable the related bit in CORE_CAPABILITY to correctly report this feature to guest. 2. Differentiate MSR TEST_CTL between host and guest. Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index b4e7d645275a..bbb9859350b5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -1663,6 +1663,11 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) u32 index; switch (msr_info->index) { + case MSR_TEST_CTL: + if (!vmx->msr_test_ctl_mask) + return 1; + msr_info->data = vmx->msr_test_ctl; + break; #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 case MSR_FS_BASE: msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_FS_BASE); @@ -1797,6 +1802,12 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) u32 index; switch (msr_index) { + case MSR_TEST_CTL: + if (!vmx->msr_test_ctl_mask || + (data & vmx->msr_test_ctl_mask) != data) + return 1; + vmx->msr_test_ctl = data; + break; case MSR_EFER: ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info); break; @@ -4106,6 +4117,16 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) } } +static u64 vmx_get_msr_test_ctl_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + u64 mask = 0; + + if (vcpu->arch.core_capability & CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT) + mask |= TEST_CTL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT; + + return mask; +} + static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event) { struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); @@ -4114,6 +4135,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event) vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0; vmx->spec_ctrl = 0; + vmx->msr_test_ctl = 0; + vmx->msr_test_ctl_mask = vmx_get_msr_test_ctl_mask(vcpu); vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x100000000ULL; vmx->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = get_rdx_init_val(); @@ -6313,6 +6336,23 @@ static void atomic_switch_perf_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) msrs[i].host, false); } +static void atomic_switch_msr_test_ctl(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +{ + u64 host_msr_test_ctl; + + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)) + return; + + host_msr_test_ctl = this_cpu_read(msr_test_ctl_cache); + + if (host_msr_test_ctl == vmx->msr_test_ctl) { + clear_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_TEST_CTL); + } else { + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_TEST_CTL, vmx->msr_test_ctl, + host_msr_test_ctl, false); + } +} + static void vmx_arm_hv_timer(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val) { vmcs_write32(VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE, val); @@ -6421,6 +6461,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) atomic_switch_perf_msrs(vmx); + atomic_switch_msr_test_ctl(vmx); + vmx_update_hv_timer(vcpu); /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h index f879529906b4..8690a1295548 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ struct vcpu_vmx { u64 msr_guest_kernel_gs_base; #endif + u64 msr_test_ctl; + u64 msr_test_ctl_mask; u64 spec_ctrl; u32 vm_entry_controls_shadow; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index e88be97d47b9..60aaf75d0fe5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -1231,7 +1231,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_get_arch_capabilities); static u64 kvm_get_core_capability(void) { - return 0; + u64 data = 0; + + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITY)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY, data); + + /* mask non-virtualizable functions */ + data &= CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT; + } else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)) { + /* + * There will be a list of FMS values that have split lock + * detection but lack the CORE CAPABILITY MSR. In this case, + * set CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT since we emulate + * MSR CORE_CAPABILITY. + */ + data |= CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT; + } + + return data; } static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)