From patchwork Fri Apr 8 00:13:53 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 12805943 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1371CC433F5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232823AbiDHAQm (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:16:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53592 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232802AbiDHAQe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:16:34 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C3F14B84E for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 2380EQ790019443, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36504.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 2380EQ790019443 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:14:26 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.27; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:14:26 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.16.21.190) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:14:26 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 13/13] rtw89: pci: correct return value handling of rtw89_write16_mdio_mask() Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:13:53 +0800 Message-ID: <20220408001353.17188-14-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220408001353.17188-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20220408001353.17188-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.16.21.190] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 04/07/2022 23:57:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5_tw?b?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzQvNyCkVaTIIDEwOjAw?= =?big5_tw?b?OjAw?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Fix wrong checking statement. Fortunately, this wrong code doesn't affect existing chip. Fixes: 740c431c22fe ("rtw89: pci: add register definition to rtw89_pci_info to generalize pci code") Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c index dcf907b81cffa..ecb419010f0c2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ rtw89_write16_mdio_mask(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 addr, u16 mask, u16 data, u u16 val; ret = rtw89_read16_mdio(rtwdev, addr, speed, &val); - if (!ret) + if (ret) return ret; shift = __ffs(mask); @@ -1530,7 +1530,7 @@ rtw89_write16_mdio_mask(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 addr, u16 mask, u16 data, u val |= ((data << shift) & mask); ret = rtw89_write16_mdio(rtwdev, addr, val, speed); - if (!ret) + if (ret) return ret; return 0;