From patchwork Mon May 16 00:52:14 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 12850183 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BB4C433EF for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 00:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238386AbiEPAwl (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2022 20:52:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238185AbiEPAwk (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2022 20:52:40 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706ED255B4 for ; Sun, 15 May 2022 17:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 24G0qY0A1000858, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36504.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 24G0qY0A1000858 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:34 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.27; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:33 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.16.17.21) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:33 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] rtw89: convert rtw89_band to nl80211_band precisely Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:14 +0800 Message-ID: <20220516005215.5878-6-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220516005215.5878-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20220516005215.5878-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.16.17.21] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 05/16/2022 00:38:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5_tw?b?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzUvMTUgpFWkyCAxMDow?= =?big5_tw?b?MDowMA==?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Zong-Zhe Yang Before 6 GHz band was supported, i.e. only 2 GHz and 5 GHz, they were the same from the numerical point of view. However, after 6 GHz band support, we need to do this conversion logically. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 11 +++++++---- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 13 +++++++------ 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c index e3317deafa1d0..a6a90572e74bf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c @@ -1608,10 +1608,13 @@ static void rtw89_core_update_rx_status(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, if (rtwdev->scanning && RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD, &rtwdev->fw)) { - rx_status->freq = - ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(hal->current_channel, - hal->current_band_type); - rx_status->band = rtwdev->hal.current_band_type; + u8 chan = hal->current_channel; + u8 band = hal->current_band_type; + enum nl80211_band nl_band; + + nl_band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(band); + rx_status->freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(chan, nl_band); + rx_status->band = nl_band; } if (desc_info->icv_err || desc_info->crc32_err) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h index 2921814842ffa..e8a77225a90ff 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h @@ -3480,6 +3480,20 @@ static inline u8 rtw89_hw_to_rate_info_bw(enum rtw89_bandwidth hw_bw) return RATE_INFO_BW_20; } +static inline +enum nl80211_band rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(enum rtw89_band hw_band) +{ + switch (hw_band) { + default: + case RTW89_BAND_2G: + return NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; + case RTW89_BAND_5G: + return NL80211_BAND_5GHZ; + case RTW89_BAND_6G: + return NL80211_BAND_6GHZ; + } +} + static inline enum rtw89_bandwidth nl_to_rtw89_bandwidth(enum nl80211_chan_width width) { diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c index e4be785709d10..4718aced1428a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c @@ -2068,7 +2068,7 @@ static void rtw89_release_pkt_list(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) struct rtw89_pktofld_info *info, *tmp; u8 idx; - for (idx = RTW89_BAND_2G; idx < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; idx++) { + for (idx = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; idx < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; idx++) { if (!(rtwdev->chip->support_bands & BIT(idx))) continue; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c index 79e4c28495c80..762cdba9d3cfd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c @@ -429,27 +429,28 @@ void rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS16, RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS24}; u8 band = rtwdev->hal.current_band_type; + enum nl80211_band nl_band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(band); u8 tx_nss = rtwdev->hal.tx_nss; u8 i; for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++) if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_he[i], RA_MASK_HE_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_HE, - mask->control[band].he_mcs[i], + mask->control[nl_band].he_mcs[i], 0, true)) goto out; for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++) if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_vht[i], RA_MASK_VHT_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_VHT, - mask->control[band].vht_mcs[i], + mask->control[nl_band].vht_mcs[i], 0, true)) goto out; for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++) if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_ht[i], RA_MASK_HT_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_HT, - mask->control[band].ht_mcs[i], + mask->control[nl_band].ht_mcs[i], 0, true)) goto out; @@ -457,18 +458,18 @@ void rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, * require at least one basic rate for ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask, * so the decision just depends on if all bitrates are set or not. */ - sband = rtwdev->hw->wiphy->bands[band]; + sband = rtwdev->hw->wiphy->bands[nl_band]; if (band == RTW89_BAND_2G) { if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1, RA_MASK_CCK_RATES | RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_CCK | RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM, - mask->control[band].legacy, + mask->control[nl_band].legacy, BIT(sband->n_bitrates) - 1, false)) goto out; } else { if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6, RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM, - mask->control[band].legacy, + mask->control[nl_band].legacy, BIT(sband->n_bitrates) - 1, false)) goto out; }