From patchwork Fri Dec 9 02:09:39 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 13069185 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A561C10F1D for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 02:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229635AbiLICLB (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 21:11:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229592AbiLICK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 21:10:58 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B188B9580 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 18:10:55 -0800 (PST) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.77 with qID 2B92A0XE0005392, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36506.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.81/5.90) with ESMTPS id 2B92A0XE0005392 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:10:00 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36506.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.9; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:10:48 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.21.69.188) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.7; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:10:47 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: Subject: [PATCH 2/3] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: correct DPK settings Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:09:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20221209020940.9573-3-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209020940.9573-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20221209020940.9573-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.21.69.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 12/09/2022 01:50:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5_tw?b?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzEyLzkgpFekyCAxMjoy?= =?big5_tw?b?MzowMA==?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Some DPK settings are wrong, and causes bad TX performance occasionally. So, fix them by internal suggestions. Fixes: da4cea16cb13 ("rtw89: 8852c: rfk: add DPK") Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h | 2 ++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c | 9 ++++----- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h index 5324e645728bb..ca6f6c3e63095 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h @@ -3671,6 +3671,8 @@ #define RR_TXRSV_GAPK BIT(19) #define RR_BIAS 0x5e #define RR_BIAS_GAPK BIT(19) +#define RR_TXAC 0x5f +#define RR_TXAC_IQG GENMASK(3, 0) #define RR_BIASA 0x60 #define RR_BIASA_TXG GENMASK(15, 12) #define RR_BIASA_TXA GENMASK(19, 16) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c index f5b0b57f33207..f3a07b0e672f7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c @@ -1872,12 +1872,11 @@ static void _dpk_rf_setting(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 gain, 0x50101 | BIT(rtwdev->dbcc_en)); rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_MOD_V1, RR_MOD_MASK, RF_DPK); - if (dpk->bp[path][kidx].band == RTW89_BAND_6G && dpk->bp[path][kidx].ch >= 161) { + if (dpk->bp[path][kidx].band == RTW89_BAND_6G && dpk->bp[path][kidx].ch >= 161) rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_IQGEN, RR_IQGEN_BIAS, 0x8); - rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_LOGEN, RR_LOGEN_RPT, 0xd); - } else { - rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_LOGEN, RR_LOGEN_RPT, 0xd); - } + + rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_LOGEN, RR_LOGEN_RPT, 0xd); + rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_TXAC, RR_TXAC_IQG, 0x8); rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_RXA2, RR_RXA2_ATT, 0x0); rtw89_write_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_TXIQK, RR_TXIQK_ATT2, 0x3);