mbox series

pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2023-03-24

Message ID 20230324173931.1812694-1-stefan@datenfreihafen.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2023-03-24 | expand

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wpan/wpan.git tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24

Message

Stefan Schmidt March 24, 2023, 5:39 p.m. UTC
Hello Dave, Jakub, Paolo.

An update from ieee802154 for your *net* tree:

Two small fixes this time.

Dongliang Mu removed an unnecessary null pointer check.

Harshit Mogalapalli fixed an int comparison unsigned against signed from a
recent other fix in the ca8210 driver.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

The following changes since commit cd356010ce4c69ac7e1a40586112df24d22c6a4b:

  net: phy: mscc: fix deadlock in phy_ethtool_{get,set}_wol() (2023-03-15 21:33:22 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wpan/wpan.git tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24

for you to fetch changes up to 984cfd55e0c99e80b2e5b1dc6b2bf98608af7ff9:

  net: ieee802154: remove an unnecessary null pointer check (2023-03-17 09:13:53 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dongliang Mu (1):
      net: ieee802154: remove an unnecessary null pointer check

Harshit Mogalapalli (1):
      ca8210: Fix unsigned mac_len comparison with zero in ca8210_skb_tx()

 drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
 net/ieee802154/nl802154.c       | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski March 28, 2023, 2:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:39:31 +0100 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> An update from ieee802154 for your *net* tree:
> 
> Two small fixes this time.
> 
> Dongliang Mu removed an unnecessary null pointer check.
> 
> Harshit Mogalapalli fixed an int comparison unsigned against signed from a
> recent other fix in the ca8210 driver.

Hi Stefan! I see a ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-02 tag in your tree but
no ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24:

$ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wpan/wpan.git \
	tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24 
fatal: couldn't find remote ref tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24
Stefan Schmidt March 28, 2023, 7:10 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello Jakub.

On 28.03.23 04:38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:39:31 +0100 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> An update from ieee802154 for your *net* tree:
>>
>> Two small fixes this time.
>>
>> Dongliang Mu removed an unnecessary null pointer check.
>>
>> Harshit Mogalapalli fixed an int comparison unsigned against signed from a
>> recent other fix in the ca8210 driver.
> 
> Hi Stefan! I see a ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-02 tag in your tree but
> no ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24:
> 
> $ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wpan/wpan.git \
> 	tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24
> fatal: couldn't find remote ref tags/ieee802154-for-net-2023-03-24

Sorry for that. I did not update my pull request script when changing 
the git tree URLs to our team tree. Updated now.

The tag is now on the tree above. You want me to send a new pull request 
or do you take it from here?

regards
Stefan Schmidt
Jakub Kicinski March 28, 2023, 10:14 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:10:07 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Sorry for that. I did not update my pull request script when changing 
> the git tree URLs to our team tree. Updated now.
> 
> The tag is now on the tree above. You want me to send a new pull request 
> or do you take it from here?

Thanks, fresh PR would be better, I can't re-trigger the patchwork
checks on an existing one :(
Stefan Schmidt March 29, 2023, 6:48 a.m. UTC | #4
Hello.

On 29.03.23 00:14, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:10:07 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Sorry for that. I did not update my pull request script when changing
>> the git tree URLs to our team tree. Updated now.
>>
>> The tag is now on the tree above. You want me to send a new pull request
>> or do you take it from here?
> 
> Thanks, fresh PR would be better, I can't re-trigger the patchwork
> checks on an existing one :(

Sure, no problem. Sent a v2 just now.

regards
Stefan Schmidt