Message ID | 20230623195506.40b87b5f@xps-13 (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | pull-request: ieee802154 for net-next 2023-06-23 | expand |
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:55:06 +0200 Miquel Raynal wrote: > As you know, we are trying to build a wpan maintainers group so here is > my first ieee802154 pull-request for your *net-next* tree. Pulled thanks! In the future, please try to avoid merging in tags from Linus's tree directly. You can send a PR to net-next and fast forward, that results in a more straightforward shape of the history, and avoids getting the back-merging wrong (Linus said a couple of times that any cross- -merge must have an explanation in the commit message, for example).
Hi Jakub, kuba@kernel.org wrote on Sat, 24 Jun 2023 15:59:47 -0700: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:55:06 +0200 Miquel Raynal wrote: > > As you know, we are trying to build a wpan maintainers group so here is > > my first ieee802154 pull-request for your *net-next* tree. > > Pulled thanks! > > In the future, please try to avoid merging in tags from Linus's tree > directly. You can send a PR to net-next and fast forward, that results > in a more straightforward shape of the history, and avoids getting > the back-merging wrong (Linus said a couple of times that any cross- > -merge must have an explanation in the commit message, for example). I agree merging upstream tags darkens the history. So IIUC, it's fine to have an -rc tag higher than -rc1 as base, but you prefer to receive one merge request per "base tag". Duly noted. Thanks! Miquèl