mbox series

[00/14] lustre: fixes for many test failures

Message ID 1546810607-6348-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series lustre: fixes for many test failures | expand

Message

James Simmons Jan. 6, 2019, 9:36 p.m. UTC 
This patch series contains mostly fixes to resolve the majority of
the testing failures seen. Besides that are UAPI headers fixes to
prepare for when lustre will leave the staging tree. Include Neil's
dump_page_cache patch as well since it was landed in the OpenSFS
branch and the migration of lu_objects to rhashtables depended on
it.

James Simmons (9):
  lustre: uapi: replace cfs_size_* macros with __ALIGN_KERNEL
  lustre: uapi: final fixes for UAPI support.
  lustre: llite: op_data->op_valid is incorrect in ll_dir_getstripe
  lustre: llite: return correct amount of bytes for short operations
  lustre: llite: user xattr_prefix() to create xattr full name
  lustre: llite: conditionally set it_flags in ll_file_open
  lustre: llite: fix file migration
  lustre: sysfs: temporary work around for sysfs naming
  lustre: libcfs: hide struct cfs_cpt_table internals

John L. Hammond (1):
  lustre: llite: add LL_IOC_FUTIMES_3

Lai Siyao (1):
  lustre: llite: improve getdirstripe interface

Minh Diep (1):
  lustre: uapi: fix lustre_user.h to C++ compatible

NeilBrown (1):
  lustre: llite: change how "dump_page_cache" walks a hash table

Patrick Farrell (1):
  lustre: llite: Add S_NOSEC support

 .../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_cpu.h       |  39 +----
 .../staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/lib-types.h  |   1 +
 .../lustre/include/uapi/linux/lnet/lnet-types.h    |   1 -
 .../lustre/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h  |  14 +-
 .../lustre/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_user.h |  57 ++++---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_cpu.c    |  34 ++++
 .../staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h    |   2 +
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c          |   3 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c         |  53 ++++++-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c    |  25 ++-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c        |   1 +
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_dev.c      | 173 ++++++++++-----------
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_io.c       |  10 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/xattr.c        |   4 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c        |   1 -
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mgc/mgc_request.c    |   2 +-
 .../staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_config.c    |   2 +-
 17 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-)

Comments

NeilBrown Jan. 7, 2019, 5:17 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, Jan 06 2019, James Simmons wrote:

> This patch series contains mostly fixes to resolve the majority of
> the testing failures seen. Besides that are UAPI headers fixes to
> prepare for when lustre will leave the staging tree. Include Neil's
> dump_page_cache patch as well since it was landed in the OpenSFS
> branch and the migration of lu_objects to rhashtables depended on
> it.

Thanks - I've applied these.
I haven't received all of the PFL series yet ... 16,17,18 still in limbo
- so I haven't applied those yet.
When the stragglers here here, I suspect they'll all go in.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
James Simmons Jan. 7, 2019, 9:57 p.m. UTC | #2 
> On Sun, Jan 06 2019, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> > This patch series contains mostly fixes to resolve the majority of
> > the testing failures seen. Besides that are UAPI headers fixes to
> > prepare for when lustre will leave the staging tree. Include Neil's
> > dump_page_cache patch as well since it was landed in the OpenSFS
> > branch and the migration of lu_objects to rhashtables depended on
> > it.
> 
> Thanks - I've applied these.
> I haven't received all of the PFL series yet ... 16,17,18 still in limbo
> - so I haven't applied those yet.
> When the stragglers here here, I suspect they'll all go in.

Do you recieve patch 16,17,18 ? I do see they made it to the mailing list
archive :

http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/2019-January/thread.html

Also they are showing up at the patchwork site:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/lustre-devel/list

which is much easier to work with as a patch. Lastly if you need I can 
send you those patches directly to you again. Let me know what you want.
NeilBrown Jan. 7, 2019, 11:09 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jan 07 2019, James Simmons wrote:

>> On Sun, Jan 06 2019, James Simmons wrote:
>> 
>> > This patch series contains mostly fixes to resolve the majority of
>> > the testing failures seen. Besides that are UAPI headers fixes to
>> > prepare for when lustre will leave the staging tree. Include Neil's
>> > dump_page_cache patch as well since it was landed in the OpenSFS
>> > branch and the migration of lu_objects to rhashtables depended on
>> > it.
>> 
>> Thanks - I've applied these.
>> I haven't received all of the PFL series yet ... 16,17,18 still in limbo
>> - so I haven't applied those yet.
>> When the stragglers here here, I suspect they'll all go in.
>
> Do you recieve patch 16,17,18 ? I do see they made it to the mailing list
> archive :

Yes, they arrived eventually, thanks.  The whole series seemed to be
coming in dribs and drabs ... some mail server somewhere must have been
a bit sick.

I'll have a look through them all today.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


>
> http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/2019-January/thread.html
>
> Also they are showing up at the patchwork site:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/lustre-devel/list
>
> which is much easier to work with as a patch. Lastly if you need I can 
> send you those patches directly to you again. Let me know what you want.