From patchwork Fri Sep 7 00:49:32 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: NeilBrown X-Patchwork-Id: 10591377 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C3D112B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E5E2AF87 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 6C0AA2B17D; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:54:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BC9A2AF87 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6944E3254; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:54:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Delivered-To: lustre-devel-lustre.org@pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC74F4E3215 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22747AE56; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:54:36 +0000 (UTC) From: NeilBrown To: Oleg Drokin , Doug Oucharek , James Simmons , Andreas Dilger Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 10:49:32 +1000 Message-ID: <153628137216.8267.15666994772553520296.stgit@noble> In-Reply-To: <153628058697.8267.6056114844033479774.stgit@noble> References: <153628058697.8267.6056114844033479774.stgit@noble> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 23/34] lnet: don't need lock to test ln_shutdown. X-BeenThere: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "For discussing Lustre software development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lustre Development List Errors-To: lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org Sender: "lustre-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP ln_shutdown returns -ESHUTDOWN if ln_shutdown is already set. The lock is always taken to set ln_shutdown, but apparently we don't need to hold the lock for this test. I guess if it is set immediately after the test, and before we take the lock then.... can anything bad happen? This is part of 8cbb8cd3e771e7f7e0f99cafc19fad32770dc015 LU-7734 lnet: Multi-Rail local NI split Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c index 60f34c4b85d3..46e593fbb44f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c @@ -1099,12 +1099,9 @@ lnet_send(lnet_nid_t src_nid, struct lnet_msg *msg, lnet_nid_t rtr_nid) cpt = lnet_cpt_of_nid(rtr_nid == LNET_NID_ANY ? dst_nid : rtr_nid, local_ni); again: - lnet_net_lock(cpt); - - if (the_lnet.ln_shutdown) { - lnet_net_unlock(cpt); + if (the_lnet.ln_shutdown) return -ESHUTDOWN; - } + lnet_net_lock(cpt); if (src_nid == LNET_NID_ANY) { src_ni = NULL;