From patchwork Fri Sep 7 00:49:32 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: NeilBrown X-Patchwork-Id: 10591393 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7E9112B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEF22AF87 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 926582B17D; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:55:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDCD2AF87 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9FD4E32BC; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:55:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Delivered-To: lustre-devel-lustre.org@pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9144E1E13 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:55:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71087AD72; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:55:34 +0000 (UTC) From: NeilBrown To: Oleg Drokin , Doug Oucharek , James Simmons , Andreas Dilger Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 10:49:32 +1000 Message-ID: <153628137248.8267.6726065772840936203.stgit@noble> In-Reply-To: <153628058697.8267.6056114844033479774.stgit@noble> References: <153628058697.8267.6056114844033479774.stgit@noble> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 31/34] lnet: lnet_dyn_add_ni: fix ping_info count X-BeenThere: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "For discussing Lustre software development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lustre Development List Errors-To: lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org Sender: "lustre-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Use the correct count of interfaces when calling lnet_ping_info_setup() in lnet_dyn_add_ni() Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek --- drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c index cf0ffb8ac84b..2ce0a7212dc2 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c @@ -871,6 +871,18 @@ lnet_ping_info_create(int num_ni) return ping_info; } +static inline int +lnet_get_net_ni_count_locked(struct lnet_net *net) +{ + struct lnet_ni *ni; + int count = 0; + + list_for_each_entry(ni, &net->net_ni_list, ni_netlist) + count++; + + return count; +} + static inline int lnet_get_ni_count(void) { @@ -1977,6 +1989,7 @@ lnet_dyn_add_ni(lnet_pid_t requested_pid, struct lnet_ioctl_config_data *conf) struct list_head net_head; struct lnet_remotenet *rnet; int rc; + int net_ni_count; int num_acceptor_nets; __u32 net_type; struct lnet_ioctl_config_lnd_tunables *lnd_tunables = NULL; @@ -2014,7 +2027,19 @@ lnet_dyn_add_ni(lnet_pid_t requested_pid, struct lnet_ioctl_config_data *conf) goto failed0; } - rc = lnet_ping_info_setup(&pinfo, &md_handle, 1 + lnet_get_ni_count(), + /* + * make sure you calculate the correct number of slots in the ping + * info. Since the ping info is a flattened list of all the NIs, + * we should allocate enough slots to accomodate the number of NIs + * which will be added. + * + * We can use lnet_get_net_ni_count_locked() since the net is not + * on a public list yet, so locking is not a problem + */ + net_ni_count = lnet_get_net_ni_count_locked(net); + + rc = lnet_ping_info_setup(&pinfo, &md_handle, + net_ni_count + lnet_get_ni_count(), false); if (rc) goto failed0;