diff --git a/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c b/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c index 07d1568..b48b23e 100644 --- a/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c +++ b/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c @@ -945,7 +945,6 @@ int ll_fill_super(struct super_block *sb) char *ptr; int len; int err; - static atomic_t ll_bdi_num = ATOMIC_INIT(0); CDEBUG(D_VFSTRACE, "VFS Op: sb %p\n", sb); @@ -970,8 +969,7 @@ int ll_fill_super(struct super_block *sb) if (err) goto out_free; - err = super_setup_bdi_name(sb, "lustre-%d", - atomic_inc_return(&ll_bdi_num)); + err = super_setup_bdi_name(sb, "lustre-%p", sb); if (err) goto out_free;
When the linux kernel introduced super_setup_bdi_name() the port for the lustre client was done which ends up creating sysfs files of the format /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/lustre-1 but their is not way to correlate this with the naming of lustre sysfs objects. Update the bdi handle to use the naming method applied to the llite sysfs tree. WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9558 Lustre-commit: 1defa62a19e7 ("LU-9558 llite: port lustre to unified handling of bdi") Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/28511 Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> --- fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)