| Message ID | cover.1741072099.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | pm misc cleanups | expand |
Hi Geliang,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/13649066260
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/88e393d9b0da
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=939900
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
Hi Geliang, On 04/03/2025 08:16, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > Resend two pm related cleanups. > > The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think > similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too. Thank you for the follow-up! Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Cheers, Matt
Hi Geliang, On 04/03/2025 08:16, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > Resend two pm related cleanups. > > The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think > similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too. Thank you for the patches, now in our tree (feat. for net-next): New patches for t/upstream: - ab6672511dbe: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: use kmemdup helper - 84e8a48a2088: mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm - Results: c6a94c37f925..9b16a0d6640c (export) Tests are now in progress: - export: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/74a0c64e68823fb4b3a9f3ee1a2a8e195a12d986/checks Cheers, Matt
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> Resend two pm related cleanups. The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too. Geliang Tang (2): mptcp: pm: in-kernel: use kmemdup helper mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm net/mptcp/pm.c | 8 ++++---- net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)