Message ID | 0b18abccee51f68bb1e0016426159df0b2ca1e36.1742804266.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Matthieu Baerts |
Headers | show |
Series | BPF path manager, part 6 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
matttbe/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 115 lines checked |
matttbe/shellcheck | success | MPTCP selftests files have not been modified |
matttbe/build | success | Build and static analysis OK |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__normal | success | Success! ✅ |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__debug | success | Success! ✅ |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf-normal__only_bpftest_all_ | success | Success! ✅ |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf-debug__only_bpftest_all_ | success | Success! ✅ |
Hi Geliang, On 24/03/2025 09:19, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > This patch adds an optional .add_addr_received interface for struct > mptcp_pm_ops and invokes it in mptcp_pm_worker(). > > This interface is only implemented in the in-kernel PM as a wrapper > of mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(). > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > --- > include/net/mptcp.h | 1 + > net/mptcp/pm.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 - > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h > index 4ac936e4ce0d..5118d11d2ee9 100644 > --- a/include/net/mptcp.h > +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h > @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct mptcp_pm_ops { > /* optional */ > void (*established)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); > void (*subflow_established)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); > + void (*add_addr_received)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); > > char name[MPTCP_PM_NAME_MAX]; > struct module *owner; > diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c > index 8efb47331f79..71589cd5dee7 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c > @@ -607,10 +607,11 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk, > (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) { How do you plan to remove the 'if (mptcp_pm_is_userspace(msk))' here above. I guess this code is there to force the other peer to retransmit the ADD_ADDR, hoping a userspace will be launched in between. Either we remove this exception for the userspace PM (other events will not be retransmitted: RM_ADDR, subflow closed, etc.), or we have another hook but it feels wrong. EDIT: I just saw your patch 7/9. Maybe we should avoid adding this add_addr_echo hook, no? It is not clear what should be done here. I need to think about that too. An alternative is to send the ADD_ADDR echo from the worker, if pm->ops->add_addr_received() returned true. If pm->ops->add_addr_received is not implemented, then the ADD_ADDR echo is scheduled from here. WDYT? > mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true); > mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk); > - } else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { > - pm->remote = *addr; > - } else { > - ret = -EINVAL; > + } else if (pm->ops->add_addr_received) { > + if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) > + pm->remote = *addr; > + else > + ret = -EINVAL; > } > > if (ret) > @@ -948,6 +949,12 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > return; > > pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status); > + if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { > + spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); > + pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED); > + spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); > + pm->ops->add_addr_received(msk); > + } > if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) { > spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); > pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK); > @@ -972,9 +979,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); > pm->ops->subflow_established(msk); > } > - spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); > - __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(msk); > - spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); > } > > static void mptcp_pm_ops_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, > diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c > index 2e181224bccb..4f4791620072 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c > @@ -461,12 +461,13 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > msk->pm.add_addr_accepted, add_addr_accept_max, > msk->pm.remote.family); > > + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); > remote = msk->pm.remote; > mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &remote, true); > mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk); > > if (lookup_subflow_by_daddr(&msk->conn_list, &remote)) > - return; > + goto out; > > /* pick id 0 port, if none is provided the remote address */ > if (!remote.port) > @@ -477,7 +478,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > */ > nr = fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, &remote, locals); > if (nr == 0) > - return; > + goto out; > > spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) > @@ -493,6 +494,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > msk->pm.subflows >= subflows_max) > WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, false); > } > +out: > + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); > } > > void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u8 rm_id) > @@ -1342,17 +1345,6 @@ bool mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > return true; > } > > -/* Called under PM lock */ > -void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > -{ > - struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm; > - > - if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { > - pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED); > - mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk); > - } > -} > - > static int __net_init pm_nl_init_net(struct net *net) > { > struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet = pm_nl_get_pernet(net); > @@ -1394,6 +1386,11 @@ static struct pernet_operations mptcp_pm_pernet_ops = { > .size = sizeof(struct pm_nl_pernet), > }; > > +static void mptcp_pm_kernel_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > +{ > + mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk); No need to add a new static function only calling another static function with the same arguments. Simply rename mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received() to mptcp_pm_kernel_add_addr_received(). > +} > + > static void mptcp_pm_kernel_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > { > bool subflows_allowed = !!mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk); > @@ -1419,6 +1416,7 @@ struct mptcp_pm_ops mptcp_pm_kernel = { > .get_priority = mptcp_pm_kernel_get_priority, > .established = mptcp_pm_kernel_established, > .subflow_established = mptcp_pm_kernel_subflow_established, > + .add_addr_received = mptcp_pm_kernel_add_addr_received, > .init = mptcp_pm_kernel_init, > .name = "kernel", > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > index 64aa091cb685..7fa26c49fbed 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > @@ -1164,7 +1164,6 @@ void __init mptcp_pm_kernel_register(void); > void __init mptcp_pm_userspace_register(void); > void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void); > void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk); > -void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk); > unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); > unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); > unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); Cheers, Matt
diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h index 4ac936e4ce0d..5118d11d2ee9 100644 --- a/include/net/mptcp.h +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct mptcp_pm_ops { /* optional */ void (*established)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); void (*subflow_established)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); + void (*add_addr_received)(struct mptcp_sock *msk); char name[MPTCP_PM_NAME_MAX]; struct module *owner; diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c index 8efb47331f79..71589cd5dee7 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c @@ -607,10 +607,11 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk, (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) { mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true); mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk); - } else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { - pm->remote = *addr; - } else { - ret = -EINVAL; + } else if (pm->ops->add_addr_received) { + if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) + pm->remote = *addr; + else + ret = -EINVAL; } if (ret) @@ -948,6 +949,12 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) return; pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status); + if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { + spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); + pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED); + spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); + pm->ops->add_addr_received(msk); + } if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) { spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK); @@ -972,9 +979,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); pm->ops->subflow_established(msk); } - spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); - __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(msk); - spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock); } static void mptcp_pm_ops_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c index 2e181224bccb..4f4791620072 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c @@ -461,12 +461,13 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) msk->pm.add_addr_accepted, add_addr_accept_max, msk->pm.remote.family); + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); remote = msk->pm.remote; mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &remote, true); mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk); if (lookup_subflow_by_daddr(&msk->conn_list, &remote)) - return; + goto out; /* pick id 0 port, if none is provided the remote address */ if (!remote.port) @@ -477,7 +478,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) */ nr = fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, &remote, locals); if (nr == 0) - return; + goto out; spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) @@ -493,6 +494,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) msk->pm.subflows >= subflows_max) WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, false); } +out: + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); } void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u8 rm_id) @@ -1342,17 +1345,6 @@ bool mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(struct mptcp_sock *msk) return true; } -/* Called under PM lock */ -void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk) -{ - struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm; - - if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { - pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED); - mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk); - } -} - static int __net_init pm_nl_init_net(struct net *net) { struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet = pm_nl_get_pernet(net); @@ -1394,6 +1386,11 @@ static struct pernet_operations mptcp_pm_pernet_ops = { .size = sizeof(struct pm_nl_pernet), }; +static void mptcp_pm_kernel_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) +{ + mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk); +} + static void mptcp_pm_kernel_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk) { bool subflows_allowed = !!mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk); @@ -1419,6 +1416,7 @@ struct mptcp_pm_ops mptcp_pm_kernel = { .get_priority = mptcp_pm_kernel_get_priority, .established = mptcp_pm_kernel_established, .subflow_established = mptcp_pm_kernel_subflow_established, + .add_addr_received = mptcp_pm_kernel_add_addr_received, .init = mptcp_pm_kernel_init, .name = "kernel", .owner = THIS_MODULE, diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h index 64aa091cb685..7fa26c49fbed 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -1164,7 +1164,6 @@ void __init mptcp_pm_kernel_register(void); void __init mptcp_pm_userspace_register(void); void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void); void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk); -void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);