diff mbox series

[mptcp-next,v6,06/10] selftests/bpf: Add mptcp_subflow bpf_iter subtest

Message ID 1bb28d77c41cd9f6eb1c23e447d3537f2025c31d.1727168628.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series add mptcp_subflow bpf_iter | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
matttbe/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 92 lines checked
matttbe/shellcheck success MPTCP selftests files have not been modified
matttbe/build success Build and static analysis OK
matttbe/KVM_Validation__normal success Success! ✅
matttbe/KVM_Validation__debug success Success! ✅
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf__only_bpftest_all_ success Success! ✅

Commit Message

Geliang Tang Sept. 24, 2024, 9:09 a.m. UTC 
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

This patch adds a subtest named test_bpf_iter to load and verify the newly
added mptcp_subflow type bpf_iter example in test_mptcp. Use the helper
endpoint_init() to add 3 new subflow endpoints. getsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION)
is invoked to trigger the "cgroup/getsockopt" program after
wait_for_new_subflows(). Check if skel->bss->subflows equals 4 to verify
whether the "cgroup/getsockopt" program loops fourth as expected.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 076903680e75..29bd840422af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ 
 #include "mptcp_sock.skel.h"
 #include "mptcpify.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_subflow.skel.h"
+#include "mptcp_bpf_iter.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_bpf_first.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_bpf_bkup.skel.h"
 #include "mptcp_bpf_rr.skel.h"
@@ -501,6 +502,77 @@  static void test_subflow(void)
 	close(cgroup_fd);
 }
 
+static void run_bpf_iter(void)
+{
+	int server_fd, client_fd, err;
+	char new[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+	char cc[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+	socklen_t len;
+
+	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(server_fd, "start_mptcp_server"))
+		return;
+
+	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(client_fd, "connect_to_fd"))
+		goto close_server;
+
+	send_byte(client_fd);
+	wait_for_new_subflows(client_fd);
+
+	len = sizeof(new);
+	err = getsockopt(client_fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION, new, &len);
+	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "getsockopt(client_fd, TCP_CONGESTION)")) {
+		get_msk_ca_name(cc);
+		ASSERT_STREQ(new, cc, "cc");
+	}
+
+	close(client_fd);
+close_server:
+	close(server_fd);
+}
+
+static void test_bpf_iter(void)
+{
+	struct mptcp_bpf_iter *skel;
+	struct nstoken *nstoken;
+	int subflows = 4;
+	int cgroup_fd;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/mptcp_iter");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "join_cgroup: mptcp_iter"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = mptcp_bpf_iter__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load: mptcp_iter"))
+		goto close_cgroup;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	skel->links.mptcp_getsockopt = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.mptcp_getsockopt,
+								  cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.mptcp_getsockopt, "attach getsockopt"))
+		goto skel_destroy;
+
+	nstoken = create_netns();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "create_netns: mptcp_iter"))
+		goto skel_destroy;
+
+	if (endpoint_init("subflow", subflows) < 0)
+		goto close_netns;
+
+	run_bpf_iter();
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->subflows, subflows, "subflows");
+
+close_netns:
+	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
+skel_destroy:
+	mptcp_bpf_iter__destroy(skel);
+close_cgroup:
+	close(cgroup_fd);
+}
+
 static struct nstoken *sched_init(char *flags, char *sched)
 {
 	struct nstoken *nstoken;
@@ -682,6 +754,8 @@  void test_mptcp(void)
 		test_mptcpify();
 	if (test__start_subtest("subflow"))
 		test_subflow();
+	if (test__start_subtest("bpf_iter"))
+		test_bpf_iter();
 	if (test__start_subtest("default"))
 		test_default();
 	if (test__start_subtest("first"))