@@ -3607,6 +3607,36 @@ endpoint_tests()
chk_rm_nr 2 1 invert
fi
+ # flush and re-add
+ if reset_with_tcp_filter "flush re-add" ns2 10.0.3.2 REJECT OUTPUT &&
+ mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+ pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2
+ pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 2
+ # broadcast IP: no packet for this address will be received on ns1
+ pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 224.0.0.1 id 2 flags signal
+ pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+ test_linkfail=4 speed=20 \
+ run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 &
+ local tests_pid=$!
+
+ wait_attempt_fail $ns2
+ chk_subflow_nr "before flush" 1
+ chk_mptcp_info subflows 0 subflows 0
+
+ pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns2
+ pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns1
+ wait_rm_addr $ns2 0
+ ip netns exec "${ns2}" ${iptables} -D OUTPUT -s "10.0.3.2" -p tcp -j REJECT
+ pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+ wait_mpj $ns2
+ pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 id 2 flags signal
+ wait_mpj $ns2
+ mptcp_lib_kill_wait $tests_pid
+
+ chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+ chk_add_nr 2 2
+ chk_rm_nr 1 0 invert
+ fi
}
# [$1: error message]
After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using previously used IDs. Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to re-create the subflow that was previously rejected. The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID. Fixes: 06faa2271034 ("mptcp: remove multi addresses and subflows in PM") Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)