Message ID | 51cd83cb7690d756e9a71797b133bdd9f286de76.1721921695.git.pabeni@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Commit | 6d60c2cf352d061b7e8246c34cf471607f6a925b |
Delegated to: | Matthieu Baerts |
Headers | show |
Series | [mptcp-net,1/2] mptcp: fix bad RCVPRUNED mib accounting | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
matttbe/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 22 lines checked |
matttbe/shellcheck | success | MPTCP selftests files have not been modified |
matttbe/build | success | Build and static analysis OK |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__normal | success | Success! ✅ |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__debug | success | Success! ✅ |
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf__only_bpftest_all_ | success | Success! ✅ |
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Since its introduction, the mentioned MIB accounted for the wrong > event: wake-up being skipped as not-needed on some edge condition > instead of incoming skb being dropped after landing in the (subflow) > receive queue. > > Move the increment in the correct location. > > Fixes: ce599c516386 ("mptcp: properly account bulk freed memory") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> > --- > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > index b3a48d97f009..13777c35496c 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > @@ -350,8 +350,10 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk, > skb_orphan(skb); > > /* try to fetch required memory from subflow */ > - if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) > + if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) { > + MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); Hi Paolo - MIB change LGTM: Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org> > goto drop; > + } > > has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp; > > @@ -844,10 +846,8 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk) > sk_rbuf = ssk_rbuf; > > /* over limit? can't append more skbs to msk, Also, no need to wake-up*/ > - if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) { > - MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); > + if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) > return; > - } > > /* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */ > mptcp_data_lock(sk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index b3a48d97f009..13777c35496c 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -350,8 +350,10 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk, skb_orphan(skb); /* try to fetch required memory from subflow */ - if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) + if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) { + MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); goto drop; + } has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp; @@ -844,10 +846,8 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk) sk_rbuf = ssk_rbuf; /* over limit? can't append more skbs to msk, Also, no need to wake-up*/ - if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) { - MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); + if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) return; - } /* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
Since its introduction, the mentioned MIB accounted for the wrong event: wake-up being skipped as not-needed on some edge condition instead of incoming skb being dropped after landing in the (subflow) receive queue. Move the increment in the correct location. Fixes: ce599c516386 ("mptcp: properly account bulk freed memory") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)